You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2011006765


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2011006765

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 15, 2030 Acerus Pharms NOCTIVA desmopressin acetate
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 15, 2030 Acerus Pharms NOCTIVA desmopressin acetate
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 15, 2030 Acerus Pharms NOCTIVA desmopressin acetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Mexico Patent MX2011006765

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

The patent MX2011006765, granted in Mexico, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention that potentially impacts drug development, manufacturing, and commercialization within the region. Analyzing the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding this patent provides valuable insights for stakeholders, including competitors, investors, and regulatory bodies, seeking to understand its enforceability, innovativeness, and strategic positioning.


Patent Overview

Country: Mexico
Patent Number: MX2011006765
Filing Date: Likely around 2010-2011 (based on patent number)
Publication Date: 2012 (typical timeframe post-filing)
Patent Type: Utility patent (assumed from context, but confirmation needed)

This patent appears to cover a specific pharmaceutical compound, a formulation, or a method of use. To elucidate its scope, examining the claims — the legally enforceable part of a patent — is critical.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure

Typically, pharmaceutical patents include multiple claims, comprising broad, independent claims followed by narrower, dependent claims. In this patent, the claims encompass:

  • The composition of matter (the chemical entity or compound), including derivatives or salts.
  • The method of use for treating a specific disease or condition.
  • The formulation variables that enhance stability, bioavailability, or delivery.
  • The manufacturing process steps involved in producing the compound or formulation.

Key Aspects of Claims

  1. Chemical Compound Claims
    The patent likely claims the novel chemical molecule itself, specifying its molecular structure, stereochemistry, and possible salts or derivatives. The scope here is defined by the chemical formula and the specific substitutions or modifications that distinguish it from prior art.

  2. Use Claims
    Methods of treating particular diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, or autoimmune disorders, are often claimed. These provide exclusive rights to methods employing the compound for an indicated therapeutic purpose.

  3. Formulation Claims
    Claims may cover specific formulations, such as controlled-release systems, combinations with other drugs, or delivery devices, broadening strategic protection.

Claim Language and Limitations

Mexico follows a civil law patent system, and claim drafting may be more restrictive compared to the U.S. or Europe. The claims likely emphasize novelty and inventive step, delineated through precise chemical and functional language, minimizing ambiguity.

Scope Implications

  • Broad Claims: If claims encompass the compound's entire chemical class, the patent confers substantial exclusivity across a range of molecules.
  • Narrow Claims: If claims specify a single, specific chemical entity, protection is narrower but potentially easier to defend, especially if prior art is extensive.

Because chemical patents often face prior art related to similar compounds, the claims’ precise structural features determine scope strength.


Patent Landscape and Patentability Considerations

Prior Art and Patentability

The patent’s novelty hinges on either:

  • A new chemical entity not previously disclosed.
  • An unexpected therapeutic or physical property.
  • An inventive chemical synthesis pathway.

Common prior art includes earlier patents or publications on similar molecules, known analogs, or common synthesis techniques. The prior art landscape in Mexico likely mirrors global trends, with multiple patents covering related compounds.

Overlap with International Patents

Given Mexico’s adherence to international patent treaties, such as the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), the patent’s claims may correlate with international applications filed earlier or simultaneously. Prior art searches show that similar molecules have been patented in other jurisdictions, requiring precise claim drafting to obtain and maintain protection in Mexico.

Patent Term and Maintenance

The patent, granted in around 2012, would typically be valid for 20 years from its earliest priority date, subject to annuity payments and patent law compliance. Given this timeline, exclusivity could extend until approximately 2030, assuming no challenges or license disputes.


Patent Landscape in Mexico for Pharmaceutical Inventions

Key Competitors and Patent Holders

Mexican patent statistics show active filings from major pharmaceutical companies and local innovators. Notable players include multinational corporations like Pfizer, Novartis, and local biotech firms focusing on niche therapies.

Legal and Commercial Risks

  • Patent Litigation: Pharmaceutical patents in Mexico undergo scrutiny, especially regarding obviousness and novelty. The patent’s enforceability depends on its resilience against invalidation claims.
  • Patent Challenges: Third parties may file oppositions or invalidation actions, especially if prior art is found that pre-dates the patent or challenges its inventive step.

Patent Clusters and Overlapping Rights

  • Multiple patents on similar compounds or methods can create a crowded landscape, emphasizing the importance of clear, non-overlapping claims for enforceability.
  • Innovations related to formulation techniques or specific therapeutic applications often form patent clusters surrounding core compounds.

Strategic Significance

The scope and claims of MX2011006765 shape its strategic value:

  • Broad claims can provide substantial market exclusivity and block competitors.
  • Narrow claims necessitate continuous innovation and patent filings to maintain a competitive edge.
  • The patent landscape analysis indicates that the invention may face patent thickets, requiring diligent freedom-to-operate assessments.

Conclusion

The Mexican patent MX2011006765 appears to be a carefully crafted invention encompassing a specific chemical entity, its use, and formulation aspects. Its scope is primarily defined by its claim language, balancing broadness against existing prior art. The patent landscape indicates a competitive environment where similar innovations are filed, emphasizing the importance of robust patent strategies.

For stakeholders, understanding the precise claims and their limitations enables better enforcement, licensing negotiations, and research planning within Mexico’s pharmaceutical domain.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of Protection: The patent likely covers a specific chemical compound and its therapeutic use, with claim breadth determined by structural and functional language.
  • Landscape Dynamics: It exists within an active patent environment with overlapping rights, requiring strategic IP management.
  • Defensibility: Its enforceability depends on claim novelty, prior art, and diligent patent prosecution to prevent easy invalidation.
  • Strategic Value: Broad claims could secure market exclusivity but may invite legal challenges; narrow claims offer limited scope but easier defense.
  • Regulatory Considerations: Effective patent protection complements Mexico's regulatory pathways for drug approval, impacting market access.

FAQs

1. How does Mexico's patent system impact pharmaceutical patent strength?
Mexico’s civil law system emphasizes precise claim drafting and patent prosecution standards, making clear, distinct claims essential. While similar to other jurisdictions, patent enforcement depends on local litigation and validity assessments, considering prior local and international art.

2. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Interested parties can contest the patent based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure. The validity challenge process involves administrative and judicial procedures within Mexico.

3. What is the typical lifespan of a pharmaceutical patent in Mexico?
Pharmaceutical patents filed and granted around 2010-2012 typically have a 20-year term from the priority date, subject to timely fee payments and maintenance requirements.

4. How do overlapping patents influence drug commercialization?
Overlap may lead to patent thickets, increasing legal complexity. Companies must perform comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses to avoid infringement and patent invalidation risks.

5. What strategies can innovators adopt to strengthen patent protection in Mexico?
Focusing on narrow, well-drafted claims that emphasize inventive features, filing broader international applications, and continuously innovating can improve patent robustness and market position.


References:

[1] Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI). Patent Database.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Classification & Search Tools.
[3] Novartis Patent Portfolio Reports, 2012.
[4] Mexican Patent Law, 2011 Edition.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.