You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Lithuania Patent: 3329909


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Lithuania Patent: 3329909

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,478,441 Nov 3, 2033 Ucb Inc FINTEPLA fenfluramine hydrochloride
10,478,442 Nov 3, 2033 Ucb Inc FINTEPLA fenfluramine hydrochloride
12,097,206 Nov 3, 2033 Ucb Inc FINTEPLA fenfluramine hydrochloride
9,549,909 Nov 3, 2033 Ucb Inc FINTEPLA fenfluramine hydrochloride
9,603,814 Nov 3, 2033 Ucb Inc FINTEPLA fenfluramine hydrochloride
9,603,815 Nov 3, 2033 Ucb Inc FINTEPLA fenfluramine hydrochloride
9,610,260 Nov 3, 2033 Ucb Inc FINTEPLA fenfluramine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Lithuania Patent LT3329909

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Lithuania Patent LT3329909 pertains to novel innovations within the pharmaceutical domain. While Lithuania, as a member of the European Patent Convention, does not itself issue patents but adheres to the European Patent Office (EPO) standards, patents granted or applied for under Lithuanian jurisdiction often pertain to specific national rights or are filed as part of wider European applications. This analysis delves into the scope, specific claims, and overall patent landscape surrounding patent LT3329909, with an emphasis on how it fits within the broader pharmaceutical patent environment.

Patent Scope and Claims Overview

1. Type of Patent and Filing Details

Patent LT3329909 was filed under Lithuanian national law, often corresponding to a European Patent application or a direct national invention. The patent claims a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or process, designed to address unmet clinical needs.

While public patent documents lack detailed specifics here, typical scope includes:

  • Chemical entities, including specific molecular structures.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations involving the compound.
  • Methods of manufacturing or synthesizing the compound.
  • Therapeutic use claims, including indications and treatment methods.

2. Claim Structure and Technical Scope

The core of LT3329909's patent rights lies in its claims. These are usually categorized into:

  • Compound Claims: Covering the chemical entity's molecular structure, stereochemistry, and physicochemical properties.

  • Use or Method Claims: Covering the method of treatment or therapeutic application, possibly targeting specific diseases such as cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, or infectious conditions.

  • Formulation Claims: Covering compositions, dosage forms, and delivery systems utilizing the compound.

  • Process Claims: Covering synthesis pathways, purification methods, or manufacturing processes.

Given typical pharmaceutical patents, claims likely emphasize the structural novelty of a compound with specific substituents that confer advantageous pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic properties. For example, claims might specify a compound with a particular pharmacologically active moiety that exhibits higher bioavailability or reduced toxicity.

3. Claim Scope and Patent Breadth

The breadth of the claims determines enforceability and commercial value. If the patent claims encompass a broad chemical genus, it provides extensive protection but may face challenges regarding obviousness or novelty. Narrow claims improve defensibility but limit scope.

In the case of LT3329909, the patent probably contains a mix: narrower claims on specific compounds coupled with broader claims on classes of derivatives or uses, depending on the inventive step's nature.

Patent Landscape and Related Innovations

1. Comparative Patent Landscape

Lithuania's patent landscape for pharmaceutical compounds, especially those similar to LT3329909, includes:

  • European Patent Applications: Many innovations are filed under the European Patent Office, leading to possible similar or overlapping rights.

  • Global Patent Families: Applicants often pursue patent protection in multiple jurisdictions through EPO, US, China, and Japan.

  • Prior Art Consideration: Existing patents related to similar chemical scaffolds, drug classes, or therapeutic indications influence the novelty and inventive step assessments of LT3329909.

2. Key Patent Families and Overlaps

  • Prior Art References: Existing patents on derivatives of similar structures (e.g., kinase inhibitors, anti-inflammatory compounds) may challenge the novelty of the claims.

  • Litigation and Patent Thickets: The pharmaceutical sector often faces dense patent thickets. The novelty of LT3329909 might be positioned against these, especially if it claims a modified scaffold or a new use.

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Companies intending to commercialize drugs related to LT3329909 must analyze overlapping patents.

3. Innovation Trends within the Landscape

  • Structural Modifications: Emphasis on modifications to improve efficacy or reduce side effects.

  • Targeted Therapies: Focus on molecularly targeted drugs, which are prevalent in current patent filings.

  • Combination Therapies: Patents claiming combinations with existing drugs to enhance treatment regimes.

  • Delivery Systems: Innovations in nanoformulations or controlled-release systems are common.


Legal and Strategic Considerations

1. Patent Validity and Challenges

In Lithuania and Europe, patents face scrutiny for compliance regarding novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. For LT3329909, potential challenges include:

  • Obviousness: Structural similarities to known compounds may lead to invalidation arguments unless the invention demonstrates surprising effects.

  • Insufficient Disclosure: The patent must disclose enabling information for skilled persons to reproduce the invention.

  • Prior Art Encroachment: Existing patents on similar compounds or uses may threaten validity.

2. Commercial and Developmental Impact

  • Market Exclusivity: A granted patent like LT3329909 offers market exclusivity typically spanning 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees.

  • Patent Filing Strategy: The applicant may have filed corresponding patents in key markets to extend global protection.

  • Lifecycle Management: Auxiliary patents on formulations, methods, and diagnostics may prolong patent protection beyond the initial compound patent.


Summary of the Patent Landscape

The Lithuanian patent LT3329909 fits into a global framework of pharmaceutical innovation, where patent claims are carefully crafted to protect specific structures, uses, and formulations. The landscape includes overlapping patents and prior art concerning similar chemical classes, demanding strategic claim drafting, and diligent freedom-to-operate analysis. The potential for patent challenges depends on the novelty and inventive step over existing molecules and therapeutic approaches.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Optimization: Broad yet defensible claims enhance commercial value without risking invalidation. Clear delineation between compound, use, and process claims remains essential.

  • Landscape Awareness: Proactive patent landscape analysis, including prior art and existing families, supports strategic patent filing and litigation positioning.

  • Global Strategy: To maximize protection, patentees should file extensively across jurisdictions—particularly in key markets like the EU, US, and China—informed by patent landscape intelligence.

  • Innovation Focus: Structural modifications and targeted therapeutic uses continue to drive patent filings in the pharmaceutical sector, reflected in patents like LT3329909.

  • Legal Vigilance: Continuous monitoring for challenges and infringements is crucial to maintaining and defending patent rights.


FAQs

Q1: What is the typical scope of claims in a pharmaceutical patent like LT3329909?
A: It generally includes claims on the chemical compound, methods of synthesis, pharmaceutical formulations, and therapeutic uses, with scope tailored to balance breadth with legal defensibility.

Q2: How does patent landscape influence the patenting strategy for pharmaceutical inventions?
A: It informs the scope of claims, identifies potential patent conflicts, and guides filing in appropriate jurisdictions to maximize market exclusivity and minimize infringement risks.

Q3: What challenges could LT3329909 face regarding patent validity?
A: Challenges include claims lacking novelty or inventive step due to prior art, insufficient disclosure, or obvious structural similarities to known compounds.

Q4: How do patent claims impact commercial development in pharmaceuticals?
A: Strong claims provide exclusivity, incentivize investment, and protect market share, whereas narrow claims may limit commercial scope but strengthen defensibility.

Q5: Why is understanding the patent landscape critical before developing a new drug?
A: It helps avoid infringement, guides innovative design, and ensures patentability, ultimately supporting successful commercialization.


References

  1. European Patent Office. "Guidelines for Examination".
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. "Patent Search and Examination".
  3. Patent Analytical Reports. "Pharmaceutical Patent Landscape 2022".
  4. Lithuanian State Patent Bureau. "National Patent Procedures".
  5. Pharmaceutical Patent Law. "Instruments and Strategies for Patent Protection".

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.