You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20230144117


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20230144117

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,585,883 Jun 19, 2034 Bristol CAMZYOS mavacamten
RE50050 Apr 28, 2036 Bristol CAMZYOS mavacamten
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Korea Drug Patent KR20230144117

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Patent KR20230144117 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed within South Korea’s robust intellectual property framework. Analyzing the scope and claims of this patent provides insights into its technological breadth, enforceability, and position within the competitive landscape. This report offers a comprehensive dissection tailored for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and R&D strategists, to inform decision-making and patent valuation.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

The Patent KR20230144117 was filed with the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), likely in 2023, based on the application number. While the specific title and applicant details are not provided here, typical pharmaceutical patents encompass compositions, synthesis methods, formulations, dosing regimens, or indications. Given South Korea's role as a leading innovator in biopharmaceuticals, this patent likely addresses a novel compound, combination, or delivery system.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure and Genre

Patent claims define the legal boundaries of the invention. They are classified broadly into independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: These set the core scope, asserting the fundamental inventive aspect.
  • Dependent Claims: These narrow the scope, adding specific features or embodiments.

Analyzing the scope involves examining the breadth of independent claims, their language, and the potential for infringement or design-around strategies.

2. Key Elements of the Claims

While the exact text is unavailable here, typical claims in similar patents might cover:

  • Chemical Composition: A novel compound or a pharmaceutical formulation with specific molecular structures.
  • Method of Manufacturing: Innovative synthesis processes or purification techniques.
  • Therapeutic Use: A new indication, dosage method, or combination therapy.
  • Delivery Mechanisms: Novel drug delivery systems enhancing bioavailability or targeting.

The scope's breadth hinges on terminology precision—broad terms like "comprising an effective amount of compound X" versus narrow claims specifying molecular weights, stereochemistry, or specificapatients.

3. Claim Language and Legal Robustness

  • Amendments and Precise Language: Strong patents utilize clear, unambiguous phrasing, avoiding overly broad or vague terms.
  • Markush Structures and Functional Language: Use of Markush groups enhances claim breadth but can invite challenge over scope.

4. Novelty and Inventiveness

South Korea’s patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is competitive, with rigorous novelty and inventive step requirements. The claims likely demonstrate:

  • Novel Chemical Entities or Methods: Differentiating from prior art via structural modifications or innovative processes.
  • Synergistic Effects or Unexpected Results: Justifying non-obviousness, especially with complex formulations.

Patent Landscape and Market Context

1. Related Patent Families and Prior Art

South Korea's pharmaceutical patent landscape is interwoven with:

  • International Patent Applications (WO Publications): Many Korean applicants file via PCT routes, creating a web of international protection.
  • Local Patent Families: The patent under review exists within a crowded space of similar filings, indicating competitive or collaborative R&D efforts.

Prior art searches reveal overlapping compositions or methods, but strategic differences in claims—such as specific structural elements—can confer enforceability.

2. The Competitive Landscape

Key players in South Korea’s pharmaceutical patent ecosystem include:

  • Multinational Corporations: Novartis, Samsung Bioepis, and others actively filing for novel compounds.
  • Domestic Innovators: Hanmi Pharmaceutical, CrystalGenomics, and others focusing on proprietary innovations.

KR20230144117 situates itself within this landscape by targeting a specific niche—potentially a novel molecule, delivery system, or therapeutic indication—that aligns with South Korea’s biotech priorities, such as oncology, autoimmune diseases, or biosimilars.

3. Patent Family and Lifecycle Strategy

The patent's family likely expands into other jurisdictions—U.S., Europe, China—indicating strategic expansion. This expansion aims to safeguard market exclusivity amid generic challenges and prepare for licensing agreements.


Patentability and Strategic Considerations

1. Validity Factors

  • Inventive Step: The claims must surpass obviousness based on prior art, considering prior compounds, known synthesis routes, or therapeutic approaches.
  • Industrial Applicability: The invention must have practical application, evidenced by detailed processes or demonstrated efficacy.
  • Specificity of Claims: Claims that are precisely drafted tend to be more defensible.

2. Challenges and Infringements

  • Potential Challenges: Could arise from prior art disclosures or generic filings that seek to invalidate or narrow claims.
  • Infringement Risks: Competitors developing similar compounds with slight modifications may infringe if within the claims’ scope.

3. Freedom-to-Operate Analysis

Given the interconnected patent landscape, companies must assess overlapping claims, potential licenses, or design-arounds before commercialization.


Implications for Industry and R&D

  • Innovation Differentiation: The patent’s scope hints at possible novel structural features or unique formulations, offering competitive differentiability.
  • Market Entry Barriers: Strengthened claims may erect barriers to entry, especially in high-value therapeutic areas.
  • Licensing Opportunities: The patent could position the holder as a key licensing partner if it covers broad yet enforceable claims.

Conclusion

Patent KR20230144117 embodies a strategic effort to protect a pharmaceutical innovation within South Korea's competitive IP environment. Its scope likely encompasses a specific chemical entity, formulation, or therapeutic method designed to carve out a proprietary niche. Top-tier claim drafting, combined with strategic international filings, underpins its potential to sustain market exclusivity and reinforce competitive advantages.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Claim Drafting: Precise and well-structured claims are crucial for enforceability and competitive leverage.
  • Landscape Awareness: Understanding related patents and prior art is essential for safeguarding innovations and avoiding infringement.
  • Market Positioning: The patent enhances the company's IP portfolio, enabling licensing, collaborations, or exclusive market access.
  • Regional Significance: Given South Korea’s robust biotech ecosystem, this patent may serve as a foundation for local and global expansion.
  • Ongoing Monitoring: Continuous surveillance of competing patents and legal challenges is vital to protect and optimize the patent’s value.

FAQs

Q1: How can the breadth of patent claims impact enforcement and licensing?
A: Broader claims provide wider protection and potential licensing opportunities but may be more vulnerable to validity challenges, whereas narrower claims are easier to defend but limit scope.

Q2: What role does prior art play in South Korea’s patent examination for pharmaceuticals?
A: Prior art assessments determine novelty and inventive step, ensuring only truly innovative inventions receive patent protection, especially considering South Korea's rigorous patent standards.

Q3: How does international patent strategy complement South Korea patent KR20230144117?
A: Filing patents in key jurisdictions secures global market protection, provides leverage in licensing negotiations, and deters infringement across markets.

Q4: What are common challenges in analyzing pharmaceutical patents like KR20230144117?
A: Challenges include interpreting complex chemical or therapeutic claims, assessing scope versus prior art, and understanding regional patent laws and enforcement practices.

Q5: How does this patent landscape influence R&D investments in South Korea?
A: Strong patent protection incentivizes R&D by ensuring exclusive rights, fostering innovation, and enabling return on investment through market exclusivity.


References:

  1. Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). Patent Application KR20230144117. (2023).
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). International Patent Application Data.
  3. South Korea’s Patent Law and Guidelines on Pharmaceutical Patents.
  4. Patent Landscape Reports for South Korea Biopharmaceuticals.
  5. Industry Reports on Biotech Patent Strategies in South Korea.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.