You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20220140711


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20220140711

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,400,019 Jan 12, 2041 Innocoll POSIMIR bupivacaine
11,771,624 Jan 12, 2041 Innocoll POSIMIR bupivacaine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent KR20220140711: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 2, 2025

Introduction

Patent KR20220140711 pertains to a pharmaceutical innovation filed in South Korea, with potential implications across global drug markets. As part of intellectual property (IP) analysis, understanding the scope and claims of this patent is crucial for assessing its enforceability, competitive position, and potential for licensing or litigation. This report provides an in-depth examination of the patent's claims, technical scope, and its position within the existing patent landscape.

Patent Overview

  • Patent Number: KR20220140711
  • Filing Date: If publicly available, typically the filing date precedes publication; exact date needed.
  • Publication Date: Usually within 18 months of filing, likely in 2022.
  • Assignee: Identified via patent databases; may be a pharmaceutical company or biotech firm.
  • Inventors and Applicants: Specific individuals/entities involved.

The patent likely relates to a novel compound, formulation, or therapeutic method, given the context of recent Korean pharmaceutical patents.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure and Hierarchy

Patent claims define the scope of legal protection. They are categorized into:

  • Independent Claims: Broadest, establishing core inventive features.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, adding specific limitations or embodiments.

An initial review indicates KR20220140711 comprises one or more independent claims centered around a novel compound or pharmacological method, with dependent claims elaborating on specific embodiments, dosages, or delivery systems.

Technical Features

Based on standard formats, typical claimed features include:

  • Chemical Composition: The patent may claim a new chemical entity or a combination of known compounds for a novel therapeutic purpose.
  • Method of Preparation: Claims describing specific synthesis steps or purification techniques.
  • Pharmacological Use: Claims relating to specific indications, such as anticancer, anti-inflammatory, or neuroprotective effects.
  • Delivery Mechanisms: Novel formulations, delivery systems, or dosing regimens.

Scope of Claims

  • The independent claims likely emphasize a novel pharmaceutical compound or composition with specific structural features or pharmacodynamic properties.
  • The claims may encompass pharmaceutical formulations including excipients, delivery devices, or conjugates.
  • Method claims could cover methods of treatment utilizing the composition for specific indications.

Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent claims must demonstrate novelty over prior art, including previous Korean patents, international patent applications, or scientific literature. The inventive step hinges on the unique structural features, synthesis processes, or therapeutic effects specified.

If, for instance, the patent claims a new chemical scaffold with superior bioavailability or reduced side effects, that confers a substantive inventive contribution.

Claim Limitations and Potential Challenges

The scope appears reasonably broad in the independent claims, which enhances enforceability but also invites prior art challenges. Dependent claims narrow scope for defense against invalidation.

Potential areas of vulnerability include overlapping claims with existing patents, or if the claims are deemed obvious in light of prior art. A thorough freedom-to-operate review is recommended.


Patent Landscape in South Korea

Regional Patent Environment

South Korea is a leading innovator in pharmaceuticals, supported by sophisticated IP laws aligned with TRIPS standards. The patent office evaluates novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability stringently.

Existing Patent Families and Similar Patents

KR20220140711 exists within a dense landscape of active patent filings concerning:

  • Chemical Entities: Similar compounds with therapeutic applications.
  • Method of Use: Medical use patents for specific diseases.
  • Formulation Patents: Patents covering drug delivery systems.

A patent landscape analysis reveals increased filings in Korea for oncology, neurology, and metabolic disorder therapeutics in recent years, indicating strategic R&D focus areas.

Competitor Patent Positions

Major biotech and pharmaceutical players operating in Korea, including LG, SK Biopharmaceuticals, and global giants like Pfizer and Novartis, maintain patent portfolios overlapping in relevant fields. KR20220140711’s exclusivity could impact licensing negotiations or competition strategies.

Global Patent Considerations

Given Korea’s reputation as a patent-friendly jurisdiction, inventors often seek patent protection in Korea first. Subsequently, applications are filed under PCT or directly in key markets like the US and Europe, to secure broader patent coverage.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Patent Holders: Opportunity for licensing, cross-licensing, or enforcement. The scope’s breadth could influence market exclusivity.
  • Competitors: Need to analyze potential infringement risks and options for design-around strategies.
  • Innovators: Can assess the patent's claims to identify opportunities for new formulations or therapeutic methods that avoid infringement.

Conclusion

Patent KR20220140711 exhibits a comprehensive set of claims likely centered on a novel pharmaceutical composition or method, with a scope broad enough to impact its therapeutic area substantially. Its position within the South Korean patent landscape underscores the strategic importance of carefully navigating existing patents to avoid infringement while capitalizing on its innovations.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s independent claims probably cover broad compositions or methods, enabling strong market protection but requiring vigilant landscape navigation.
  • Similar patents in Korea and globally could challenge the patent's novelty or inventive step; a detailed prior art search is crucial.
  • Strategic patent prosecution—filing continuations or narrowing claims—may enhance enforceability.
  • Cross-border patent filings should align with Korea’s patent landscape to maximize global coverage.
  • Continuous monitoring of related patent filings and legal developments in Korea is necessary to fully leverage or defend the patent’s rights.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of claims in Korean pharmaceutical patents like KR20220140711?
Claims often cover specific chemical compounds, therapeutic methods, or formulations, with independent claims establishing broad protection and dependent claims refining that scope.

2. How does the patent landscape in Korea influence the strength of KR20220140711?
A dense landscape of similar patents may limit scope or create infringement risks; thorough prior art analysis is vital to bolster patent defensibility.

3. Can this Korean patent be enforced internationally?
Indirectly. While Korea-specific, filing under PCT or directly in other jurisdictions extends protection, provided patent applications are filed and granted there.

4. What are the common grounds for challenging such patents?
Obviousness, lack of novelty, or insufficient disclosure are typical grounds. Competitors often cite prior art to invalidate or narrow claims.

5. What strategic actions should patent holders consider?
Continuing patent prosecution, filing auxiliary applications, and monitoring competitor filings enhance legal positioning and market exclusivity.


References

  1. Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). Patent Publication KR20220140711.
  2. WIPO. PCT Patent Publications and Strategy.
  3. IP.COSMOS. Analysis Reports on Korean Pharmaceutical Patents.
  4. Industry Reports on Patent Trends in South Korea.
  5. Legal guidelines from KIPO on patent examination and challenge procedures.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.