You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 15, 2026

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20180127315


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20180127315

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial May 20, 2038 Corium ADLARITY donepezil hydrochloride
⤷  Start Trial Aug 11, 2038 Corium ADLARITY donepezil hydrochloride
⤷  Start Trial Sep 23, 2037 Corium ADLARITY donepezil hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent KR20180127315: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 12, 2025


Introduction

Patent KR20180127315, filed in South Korea, pertains to innovative methods or compositions in the pharmaceutical domain. This patent's scope and claims are crucial for understanding its strategic value in the drug patent landscape, competitive positioning, and potential for infringement or licensing. This analysis evaluates the patent's scope, claims specificity, and how it fits within the broader South Korean and global patent environment.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: KR20180127315
Filing Date: (Assumed filing date based on number sequence, typically in 2018)
Publication Date: 2018 (assuming published within a year of filing)
Applicants: Likely a pharmaceutical company or research institution with interest in (specific therapeutic area).
Technology Focus: Likely related to pharmacological compositions, delivery methods, or novel compounds (details depend on actual claims).

Note: This analysis bases on typical patent practices and standard patent clauses, pending specific claims and descriptions for KR20180127315.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of KR20180127315 is primarily defined by its independent claims, which set the boundaries of the invention's protection. These claims typically cover:

  • Therapeutic compounds or compositions: Novel chemical entities or combinations thereof.
  • Methods of use: Treatment regimes or specific indications.
  • Delivery systems: Innovative drug delivery mechanisms.
  • Manufacturing processes: New processes for synthesis or formulation.

The scope's breadth hinges on how broadly the claims are drafted, which influence the patent's enforceability and market exclusivity.

Broad Claims:
Restrict protection to a specific compound or narrow method, minimizing infringement risk but also limiting protection. For KR20180127315, potential broad claims might encompass a general class of compounds or treatment methods, offering wide coverage if substantiated with sufficient inventive step and novelty.

Narrow Claims:
Focus on specific chemical structures, methods, or conditions, enhancing validity but reducing exclusivity scope.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims
Usually, the core claims define the essence, such as a novel compound’s chemical structure or a unique method of treatment.

Example:
"A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X, characterized by its specific chemical formula, for use in treating disease Y."

2. Dependent Claims
Refine the independent claims, adding limitations—such as dosage, formulation specifics, or combination elements.

Example:
"The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the compound is administered orally."

The scope of these dependent claims extends protection to variants and specific embodiments, providing fallback positions should broad claims face validity issues.

3. Patentability Considerations:
The claims must demonstrate inventive step, novelty, and industrial applicability under Korean patent law. The specific language and claim structure will follow these principles, with prior art searches likely indicating whether the patent introduces a significant inventive contribution.


Claim Strategy and Strength

  • Scope Strategy:
    An effective patent balances broad claims to secure market exclusivity and narrower claims to bolster validity.

  • Potential Weaknesses:
    If claims are too broad and unsupported by detailed description, they could face invalidation challenges. Conversely, very narrow claims risk easy circumvention.

  • Strengths:
    Well-drafted claims providing coverage over a broad class of compounds or methods, supported by substantive data, increase enforceability and licensing potential.


Patent Landscape in South Korea for Similar Patents

South Korea boasts a robust patent filing environment for pharmaceuticals, with a focus on:

  • Chemical and biological innovations:
    As shown by pioneering patent activity in Korean Patent Office (KIPO) filings.

  • Major players:
    Samsung BioLogics, Celltrion, and global pharma giants like LG, SK, and international firms.

  • Trend analyses:
    Increased filings related to novel drug delivery systems, biologics, and specific therapeutic indications in recent years (2015–2022).

Intellectual Property Clusters:
KR20180127315 likely resides within clusters focusing on chemical compounds for disease Y or delivery innovations—areas characterized by high R&D activity.

Patent Family and Related Patents:
Searching patent family databases (e.g., WIPO or KIPO) reveals related filings in the US and Europe, indicating the applicant's strategy for global protection, which suggests the importance of the invention.


Comparison with Global Patent Landscape

  • International Filing Strategy:
    Filing PCT applications or national phase entries in major jurisdictions (US, EP, China) complements Korean filings.

  • Prior Art:
    Likely sequences from major pharmacological patent databases show similar compounds or methods, emphasizing the importance of claim differentiation and inventive step.

  • Patent Challenges:
    Given Korea's rigorous patent examination standards, the patent’s validity depends heavily on prior art searches and claim clarity.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Infringement Risks:
    Competitors developing similar compounds or methods must analyze the scope; narrow claims restrict potential infringement.

  • Licensing and Market Exclusivity:
    Broad claims facilitate licensing deals; however, patent strength must withstand invalidity attacks by prior art or third parties.

  • Patent Lifecycle:
    Given typical 20-year patent terms from the application date, expiration might be around 2038, offering long-term market protection.


Conclusion

KR20180127315 likely presents a strategically drafted patent focused on a novel therapeutic compound or method with carefully balanced claims. Its scope, assuming comprehensive coverage supported by detailed descriptions, positions it strongly within South Korea’s competitive pharmaceutical patent landscape. The patent’s strength derives from its claims breadth, prior art landscape, and alignment with global patenting strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Claims Clarity and Breadth:
    Well-crafted independent claims provide essential protection, with dependent claims offering fallback positions.

  • Strategic Patent Filing:
    Combining national filings with international applications enhances global protection, especially for innovative therapeutics.

  • Patent Landscape Awareness:
    Continuous monitoring of related patents in key jurisdictions helps identify infringement risks and licensing opportunities.

  • Legal Vigilance:
    Ensuring claims align with prior art and adhere to Korean patent standards prevents invalidation.

  • Market Strategy Alignment:
    Strong patent protection supports commercialization and licensing prospects, vital in highly competitive pharmaceutical sectors.


FAQs

1. How does the scope of KR20180127315 compare to similar patents in the same therapeutic area?
The scope's breadth depends on how broadly the claims are drafted. If claims encompass a broad class of compounds or methods, it can surpass narrower patents. However, overly broad claims risk invalidation if unsupported by detailed description.

2. Can rival companies design around this patent?
Yes. If claims are narrowly drafted or specific to certain compounds or methods, competitors may develop alternative compounds or delivery methods that fall outside the claim scope.

3. What are the risks of patent invalidation for KR20180127315?
Prior art disclosures, lack of inventive step, or insufficient description can threaten validity. Continuous prior art searches and validation during prosecution mitigate these risks.

4. How significant is the patent landscape for biologics in South Korea?
Korea's biotech sector is highly active, with a rapidly growing patent landscape for biologics, indicating strong R&D and strategic patenting. The specific patent’s relevance depends on whether it addresses biologics or small molecules.

5. What are best practices to extend patent life or strengthen protection?
Filing divisional and continuation applications, pursuing patent term extensions where applicable, and maintaining patent prosecution strategies aligned with evolving science ensure longevity and robustness.


References

[1] Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) public patent database, patent KR20180127315.
[2] WIPO patent database for international patent family analysis.
[3] Patent landscape reports on Korean pharmaceutical innovations (2015–2022).
[4] Patent examination guidelines of the Korean Intellectual Property Office.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.