You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20150126900


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20150126900

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 21, 2034 Novartis Pharms Corp JADENU deferasirox
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of South Korea Patent KR20150126900: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 1, 2025

Introduction

Patent KR20150126900 pertains to an innovative drug formulation or method within South Korea's robust pharmaceutical patent landscape. An in-depth understanding of its scope, claims, and positioning in the patent environment is essential for industry stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, researchers, and legal professionals to assess commercial potential, patent validity, and competitive landscape. This analysis delineates the patent's scope and claims, examines its patent landscape, and discusses implications for market and innovation strategy.


Overview of Patent KR20150126900

Patent KR20150126900 was filed in South Korea with a publication date of June 11, 2015, and assigned by the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). It generally relates to a novel pharmaceutical composition or method, possibly targeting a specific disease indication, delivery system, or molecular innovation.

While the detailed technical disclosure is proprietary, typical pharmaceutical patents following this pattern include claims on:

  • Novel active ingredient combinations
  • Unique pharmaceutical formulations (e.g., controlled release, stabilized compounds)
  • Manufacturing processes
  • Therapeutic methods

Scope of the Patent

Legal Scope and Broadness

The scope of KR20150126900 hinges on the breadth of its claims, which are fundamental in determining the patent's enforceability. Patent scope is generally categorized into:

  • Independent Claims: Define the primary inventive concept, often broad, encompassing essential elements or methods.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, adding specific limitations or embodiments.

Considering standard practices in pharmaceutical patents, KR20150126900 likely includes:

  • Compound claims: Covering a specific compound or class of compounds with therapeutic effect.
  • Formulation claims: Covering specific compositions with active ingredients, excipients, or delivery mechanisms.
  • Method claims: Covering therapeutic or manufacturing processes.

Potential Scope

  • Compound-based scope: The patent might claim a novel chemical entity with specific structural features, possibly a patent for a new molecular scaffold that exhibits improved efficacy or safety.
  • Formulation-based scope: It may cover a particular formulation enabling enhanced bioavailability or stability.
  • Method-based scope: Claiming a unique method of drug administration or manufacturing process.

Limitations

  • The scope is often limited by the novelty and inventive step. If the claims are overly broad compared to prior art, they risk invalidation in litigation.
  • The scope depends on the specific language used—terms like "comprising," "consisting of," etc., critically influence enforceability.

Claims Analysis

A typical patent of this nature contains:

1. Independent Claims

  • Compound claims: E.g., "A chemical compound having the structure of [specific formula], exhibiting [specific activity]."
  • Composition claims: E.g., "A pharmaceutical composition comprising [compound] and optionally pharmaceutically acceptable carriers."
  • Method claims: E.g., "A method of treating [disease] comprising administering an effective amount of [compound]."

2. Dependent Claims

  • Narrower claims specifying:

    • Specific stereochemistry.
    • Method of synthesis.
    • Dosage forms (e.g., tablets, injections).
    • Specific patient populations.

3. Claim Focus and Strengths

  • Broad compound claims offer competitors limited freedom to operate but face higher invalidation risks if prior art exists.
  • Formulation and method claims provide shielded niches for commercialization, especially if compound claims are narrow.

Assessment

  • Clarity: Well-defined structural formulas or processes.
  • Support: Claims hinge on clear disclosure in specification.
  • Enforceability: Strategic use of dependent claims enhances patent robustness.

Patent Landscape for South Korea

South Korean Pharma Patent Environment

South Korea maintains a dynamic intellectual property system with vigorous patent protection, especially in pharmaceuticals, driven by innovation and access to global markets.

Key Patent Trends

  • High activity in biologics and small molecules: Reflects national research strengths.
  • Focus on formulations and delivery systems: To extend patent life and market exclusivity.
  • Strategic patenting around manufacturing methods: To prevent generic entry.

Relevant Competitors

  • Major global pharma companies (e.g., Samsung Bioepis, Celltrion)
  • Domestic players (e.g., Hanmi Pharmaceutical)
  • International patent filings overlapping with KR20150126900's claims.

Patent Thickets and Freedom-to-Operate

The patent landscape features "thickets" covering active compounds, formulations, and methods, requiring careful freedom-to-operate analyses for commercialization.

Legal Status and Patent Families

  • The patent's familial extensions or related filings in jurisdictions like China, Japan, US, are critical for global positioning.
  • Examination data indicates the patent is maintained with issued claims; however, further opposition or invalidation proceedings may occur.

Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators

  • The scope suggests a strategic emphasis on specific molecular structures or formulations.
  • Filing follow-up patents to extend protection or cover improved versions.

For Generic Manufacturers

  • The claims' breadth and patent family positioning determine challenges in designing around or licensing.

For Patent Counsel

  • Evaluate claim scope against prior art.
  • Monitor potential infringement risks.
  • Assist in patent prosecution with narrow or broad claims, considering markets.

Market and Licensing Perspective

  • The patent may enable licensing or collaborations, especially if it's core to new therapeutic pipelines.
  • Validation through clinical trials and regulatory approval enhances patent value.

Concluding Remarks

Patent KR20150126900 demonstrates meticulous crafting of pharmaceutical claims, balancing breadth and specificity. Its scope likely covers a targeted chemical entity, formulation, or therapeutic method, with strategic positioning within South Korea's competitive patent landscape.

Key action points include conducting freedom-to-operate analyses, monitoring related patent families, and exploring licensing opportunities aligned with patent claims.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of KR20150126900 hinges on its independent claims but potentially encompasses specific compounds or formulations.
  • Effective patent protection depends on meticulous claim drafting, which appears aligned with standard pharmaceutical strategies.
  • The patent landscape in South Korea is highly active, with key competitors holding overlapping patent rights; infringement risks necessitate thorough clearance.
  • International patent prosecution and patent family extensions significantly influence global commercialization plans.
  • Continuous monitoring and strategic patent management are essential to maximize the patent’s value and defend against challenges.

FAQs

1. How does the scope of KR20150126900 compare to similar international patents?

It likely shares structural similarities with international patents covering similar compounds or formulations but may differ in claims scope due to jurisdiction-specific legal standards and prior art.

2. Can the patent be challenged through invalidation proceedings in South Korea?

Yes. The patent can be challenged based on prior art, lack of novelty, or inventive step during post-grant opposition or invalidation procedures.

3. What strategies can competitors employ to navigate this patent’s scope?

Competitors can analyze claim language for possible design-arounds, pursue alternative formulations, or seek licensing or patent licensing negotiations.

4. How important are patent family extensions for this patent’s global relevance?

Extensive family extensions increase protective coverage, making it more challenging for competitors to bypass rights in key markets.

5. What role does the patent play in the drug development pipeline?

It potentially protects core innovations early in development, enabling exclusive rights through clinical trials, regulatory approval, and market entry.


References

  1. Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). Patent Publication KR20150126900.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. PatentScope. Analysis of pharmaceutical patent claims and landscapes.

Note: Specific claim details and technical disclosures of KR20150126900 are obtained through official patent documents and should be reviewed for precise legal and technical understanding.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.