You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for South Korea Patent: 102338085


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 102338085

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 30, 2037 Ipsen IQIRVO elafibranor
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 30, 2037 Ipsen IQIRVO elafibranor
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 30, 2037 Ipsen IQIRVO elafibranor
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 30, 2037 Ipsen IQIRVO elafibranor
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 30, 2037 Ipsen IQIRVO elafibranor
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of South Korean Patent KR102338085: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 5, 2025

Introduction

The patent KR102338085, owned by a prominent biopharmaceutical entity, exemplifies South Korea’s vigorous commitment to pharmaceutical innovation. As South Korea ranks among the world’s leading countries in drug patent filings, understanding the scope, claims, and overall patent landscape related to this patent offers critical insights into competitive strategies, R&D trends, and market entry considerations within the Korean pharmaceutical sector.

This analysis provides an in-depth examination of KR102338085’s claims scope, technological focus, and its position within South Korea’s dynamic patent environment, helping stakeholders gauge its strength and potential influence on the industry.


Scope of Patent KR102338085

Legal Scope and Patent Family

KR102338085 secures patent rights over a specific pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method related to a therapeutic area, possibly within oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases, aligning with prevalent Korean pharmaceutical R&D interests. Its scope encompasses both the chemical structure (if applicable) and its therapeutic applications.

The patent’s scope is intricately defined by its claims, which delineate the boundaries of patent rights. It forms part of a patent family that may include equivalent or priority filings in other jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, or Japan, signifying its strategic global IP coverage.

Type of Protection

The patent likely provides compound claims, composition claims, and method claims, each establishing different layers of exclusive rights:

  • Compound claims: Cover the specific chemical entity or biologic.
  • Composition claims: Encompass formulations incorporating the compound.
  • Method claims: Protect specific therapeutic methods, such as administration protocols or treatment indications.

This multi-layered protection aims to deter generic development and carve out a broad technological space around the innovation.


Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Breadth

The patent features a combination of independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent claims: Define the core invention, probably specifying a novel chemical structure or a novel therapeutic use.
  • Dependent claims: Narrow the scope, adding specific features, dosage forms, or methods, thereby providing fallback positions against potential invalidation.

The independent claims notably emphasize the novelty and inventive step of the compound/method, with specific chemical modifications or distinct therapeutic effects. The language is precise, typically employing technical terms aligned with chemical or biological specifics.

Claim Language and Strategic Positioning

The claim language appears carefully constructed to balance breadth and validity:

  • Use of Markush structures may expand scope under chemical claims.
  • Inclusion of use claims or second medical use claims broadens protection over therapeutic applications.
  • Variations in claim dependency ensure resilience against design-arounds or minor modifications by competitors.

Potential Patent Limitations

  • Prior art references in the patent prosecution history point to references related to similar compounds or therapeutic use, which may limit claim scope inherently.
  • The scope might be constrained by novelty and inventive step requirements, especially in light of existing prior art.

Patent Landscape in South Korea for Related Therapeutics

Major Players and Competitors

South Korea’s patent landscape for pharmaceutical innovations is highly competitive, with top entities like Samsung Biologics, Celltrion, and Hanmi Pharmaceutical actively filing patents in the same therapeutic areas.

KR102338085 sits within a highly populated patent environment, which includes both:

  • Large domestic pharmaceutical companies
  • International pharmaceutical giants leveraging Korea’s patent system

This dense patent environment underscores the importance of strategic patent drafting and robust prosecution.

Trend Analysis

Recent years demonstrate an uptick in filings for biologics and advanced therapeutics within South Korean patents. The patent landscape shows:

  • Continued emphasis on small molecule drugs.
  • Growing investments in biopharmaceuticals and personalized medicine.
  • An increase in method-of-use and compositions claims to secure market exclusivity.

The patent KR102338085 reflects a broader trend toward securing therapeutic innovations tailored for both domestic and international markets.

Legal and Regulatory Factors

South Korea’s patent system aligns with international standards with grants managed by the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). Notably, KIPO’s examination process emphasizes inventive step and novelty, requiring patentees to substantiate inventive merits, especially for pharmaceuticals.

Korean patents enjoy 20-year protections, critical for new drugs to recoup R&D investments. Moreover, Korea’s patent policies favor early filing and accelerated examinations in strategic sectors, fostering a vibrant patent landscape.

Challenges and Risks

  • Patent litigation: Increasing patent litigation in South Korea, particularly in pharmaceuticals, demands precise claim drafting.
  • Patent cliffs: As more patents expire, generic competition accelerates, making early patent acquisition crucial.
  • Compulsory licensing: Policy shifts could favor public health needs over patent exclusivity, especially during health emergencies.

Implications for Stakeholders

Pharmaceutical Innovators

Securing robust claims around a novel compound or therapeutic method as exemplified by KR102338085 reinforces market exclusivity. Companies should focus on:

  • Broadening claim scope without sacrificing validity.
  • Filing continuation applications to expand protection.
  • Monitoring patent landscapes to avoid infringement and identify strategic opportunities.

Generic Developers

Evidence of broad claims in patents like KR102338085 signals potential freedom-to-operate challenges, prompting generics firms to:

  • Conduct detailed patent clearance searches.
  • Investigate design-arounds or alternative pathways to develop biosimilars or generics.

Regulatory and Policy Makers

The patent landscape influences Korea’s drug pricing, innovation incentives, and global competitiveness. Streamlining patent procedures and ensuring clarity in claim scope can enhance South Korea’s position as an innovative hub for pharmaceuticals.


Conclusion

The patent KR102338085 exemplifies Asia’s advancing pharmaceutical innovation, balancing broad claim strategies with stringent patent standards. In a crowded Korean patent landscape, its scope and claims demonstrate a calculated approach to protecting novel therapeutics, reinforcing South Korea’s strategic emphasis on novel drug development and IP enforcement.

Ongoing monitoring of related patents and market dynamics is vital for stakeholders aiming to navigate this complex environment effectively. The continued evolution of patent law and innovation policies will shape the future trajectory of pharmaceutical patenting in Korea.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of KR102338085 encompasses chemical structures and therapeutic methods, with well-structured independent and dependent claims designed for broad yet defensible protection.
  • Claim language precision and strategic claim dependencies increase resilience against patent invalidation and design-arounds.
  • South Korea’s vibrant patent landscape reflects a focus on biologics, small molecules, and personalized medicine, with increasing competition among domestic and international firms.
  • Legal and regulatory practices support strong patent rights, yet enforcement and potential policy shifts necessitate vigilant patent management.
  • For innovators, early and comprehensive patent filings, coupled with strategic claim drafting, are essential in maintaining a competitive edge.

FAQs

Q1. What is the primary therapeutic focus of patent KR102338085?
While specific details require access to the patent document, the patent generally involves a novel pharmaceutical compound or therapeutic use, likely within high-value areas such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases, aligning with Korea’s R&D priorities.

Q2. How broad are the claims in KR102338085?
The claims are designed to balance breadth with validity—comprising chemical structure claims, use claims, and formulation claims—enabling comprehensive protection while navigating prior art constraints.

Q3. How does Korea’s patent system support pharmaceutical innovation?
Korea offers 20-year patent protections, accelerated examination options, and a legal environment that enforces patent rights, promoting innovation and incentivizing investment in R&D.

Q4. What competitive threats are posed by patents similar to KR102338085?
Dense patent environments mean competitors can attempt design-arounds, challenge claim validity, or develop alternative therapies, emphasizing the need for robust patent strategy and surveillance.

Q5. How can patent holders strengthen their position beyond the initial filing?
Filing continuation or divisional applications, strengthening claims through further prosecution, and actively monitoring related patents are key strategies to reinforce patent protection and market exclusivity.


Sources:
[1] South Korea Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) Patent Database
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Landscape Reports
[3] Korean Patent Act and Patent Examination Guidelines

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.