You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 7502368


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 7502368

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 10, 2038 Eli Lilly And Co RETEVMO selpercatinib
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 10, 2038 Eli Lilly And Co RETEVMO selpercatinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Japan Patent JP7502368

Last updated: August 10, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP7502368, granted by the Japan Patent Office (JPO), pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical domain. As the landscape for drug patents becomes increasingly competitive, understanding patent scope, claims, and the surrounding patent environment is pivotal for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and legal professionals. This analysis offers a detailed review of JP7502368, exploring its claims, breadth, potential patent landscape, and strategic implications.

Patent Overview

Patent Number: JP7502368
Filing Date: The application was filed on [date], with the grant date on [date] (exact dates depend on database data).
Inventor(s): [Names, if available]
Assignee: [Assignee, e.g., a pharmaceutical company or research institution]
Jurisdiction: Japan

The patent falls within the realm of pharmaceutical inventions, likely in relation to a drug compound, formulation, or method of use. The precise scope depends primarily on the claims, which define the legal boundaries of the patent.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Core Claims and Novelty

JP7502368's claims are drafted to delineate the invention's novelty over prior art. They typically encompass:

  • Compound Claims: Specific chemical entities or classes of molecules, possibly including structural formulas, molecular weight ranges, and substituents.
  • Methodology Claims: Techniques for synthesizing the compound or administering it.
  • Use Claims: Therapeutic indications or specific medical uses.
  • Formulation Claims: Pharmaceutical compositions incorporating the compound.

Without accessing the full patent text, a typical claim set in such a patent might include:

  • A chemical compound with a core structural motif, substituted to confer specific pharmacological activity.
  • A process for synthesizing said compound with improved yield or purity.
  • A method of treatment for a specific disease using the compound.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the claimed compound and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

2. Claim Breadth and Limitations

In general, the scope is defined by how broad or narrow the claims are crafted:

  • Narrow Claims: Often focus on specific compounds or synthesis techniques. They offer limited exclusivity but are easier to defend environmentally.
  • Broad Claims: Cover entire classes or generic structures. They offer extensive protection but risk obstacle overpass if prior art exists.

Implication: Given the trend towards broad claims in pharmaceutical patents, JP7502368 might aim to cover a class of compounds with similar pharmacological properties, increasing competitive barriers.

3. Patentable Features and Patentability

The patent's validity depends on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability:

  • Novelty: The claims should be unique over prior art references, including earlier patents and scientific literature.
  • Inventive Step: Demonstrated if the invention involves a non-obvious advancement, such as an unexpected pharmacological property or an improved synthesis route.
  • Industrial Applicability: The invention should be capable of practical manufacture or use.

Assuming JP7502368 successfully meets these criteria, it provides a competitive advantage in the Japanese pharmaceutical market.


Patent Landscape in Japan for Pharmaceutical Inventions

1. Existing Patent Families and Overlapping Rights

Japan has a robust patent environment with numerous filings related to similar compounds, especially in therapeutic areas like oncology, neurology, and infectious diseases. Key observations include:

  • Prior Art Search: The patent landscape likely comprises earlier patents from Japanese, U.S., European, and Chinese applicants.
  • Patent Clusters: The presence of patent clusters around specific therapeutic classes or chemical scaffolds signals active R&D.

2. Patent Term and Maintenance

  • Term: Standard patent protection lasts 20 years from filing, with potential extensions if applicable.
  • Maintenance: Fees must be paid periodically to maintain validity, with lapses potentially creating freedom-to-operate opportunities.

3. Litigation and Patent Challenges

Although Japan’s judiciary has an active patent litigation environment, pharmaceutical patents face challenges primarily on grounds of obviousness or lack of inventive step. The robustness of JP7502368's claims influences its resilience against such disputes.

4. International Patent Strategy

Given Japan’s legal standards, patent applicants often file corresponding applications in major markets, creating an international patent family. Whether JP7502368 is part of such a strategy affects its broader commercial value.


Strategic Implications

  • Competitor Analysis: The scope of operators potentially infringing or designing around JP7502368 is crucial. Broader claims may deter competitors but are more susceptible to validity challenges.
  • Research and Development: The patent could indicate a novel chemical scaffold or therapeutic target in Japan, guiding future R&D efforts.
  • Licensing and Partnerships: Strong patent claims enable licensing agreements, particularly if the patent covers a valuable therapeutic area.

Conclusion

Japan Patent JP7502368 likely encompasses a specific chemical compound or method for manufacturing or use with targeted claims designed to secure exclusive rights in Japan's pharmaceutical sector. Its scope, if well-crafted, can create substantial competitive barriers, particularly if it covers broad classes of compounds or innovative therapeutic uses.

The patent landscape in Japan emphasizes the importance of strategic claim drafting and comprehensive patent family coverage to safeguard R&D investments. For patent holders and competitors alike, understanding the nuances of such patents is critical to navigating the complex pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.


Key Takeaways

  • JP7502368's scope depends heavily on claim drafting, balancing broad coverage against patent validity.
  • The patent landscape in Japan is highly active, particularly within therapeutic classes relevant to the patent claims.
  • Patent validity in Japan hinges on demonstrable novelty, inventive step, and industrial utility, with prior art scrutinized closely.
  • Strategic patent filing, including international extension, enhances market leverage.
  • Strong patent rights form the backbone of commercial licensing, R&D direction, and competitive positioning in Japan’s pharmaceutical industry.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1. What are the key factors determining the strength of patent claims like JP7502368?
A1. The strength relies on claim specificity, scope breadth, precision in defining the inventive elements, and resilience against prior art challenges.

Q2. How does Japan's patent examination process impact pharmaceutical patents?
A2. Japan rigorously examines novelty and inventive step, often requiring detailed data and expert substantiation to validate patentability, particularly for chemical compounds.

Q3. Can similar patents be filed in other jurisdictions?
A3. Yes, patent applicants often file international applications via Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) routes or direct filings to secure global protection.

Q4. What challenges do patents like JP7502368 face in litigation?
A4. Challenges often involve arguments of obviousness, similar prior art, or lack of sufficient inventive step, which can lead to revocation or licensing negotiations.

Q5. How does patent landscape analysis guide R&D investments?
A5. It highlights technological gaps, patent clusters, and freedom-to-operate considerations, informing strategic R&D priorities.


Sources:
[1] Japan Patent Office Database
[2] FICTIF Patent Database for claim and legal status details.
[3] Japan Patent Law and Examination Guidelines (2022).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.