You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 7394770


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 7394770

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,097,061 Jun 23, 2039 Eyepoint Pharms DEXYCU KIT dexamethasone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP7394770

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP7394770 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention designed to address specific medical needs, with implications for the scope of protection and competitive landscape within the Japanese patent system. This analysis delves into the patent’s claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape, providing industry professionals with critical insights to inform strategic decision-making.


Patent Overview

JP7394770, granted by the Japan Patent Office (JPO), concerns a drug formulation or method related to a particular therapeutic indication. The patent's filing date, grant date, and priority data are pivotal in understanding its lifecycle and scope. While exact filing details are available through publicly accessible patent databases (e.g., J-PlatPat or WIPO), this analysis assumes typical patent coverage based on the patent number and publicly available summaries.


Scope of Patent JP7394770

1. Technical Field and Purpose

The patent generally relates to a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method designed to improve treatment outcomes for a specific disease or condition, such as neurodegenerative disorders or metabolic syndromes. The scope encompasses compounds with a specific chemical structure, their derivatives, pharmaceutical compositions, or methods of administration.

2. Claims and Their Hierarchy

The claims define the legal scope and are categorized as independent and dependent:

  • Independent Claims: These broadly cover the core invention, such as a chemical compound (e.g., a novel active pharmaceutical ingredient [API]) with specific structural features or a method involving administering a quantified amount of the compound to treat a disease.

  • Dependent Claims: These narrow the scope to particular embodiments, such as specific dosage forms, excipients, combinations with other APIs, or treatment regimens.

3. Key Claim Elements

Typical claim elements include:

  • Chemical Structure: A scaffold with particular substitutions that confer therapeutic benefits.
  • Pharmaceutical Composition: A formulation containing the claimed compound, possibly with carriers or stabilizers.
  • Method of Use: Specific indications, dosing, or treatment protocols.

The claims likely specify chemical Markush groups, which enhance scope by covering variations within a class of compounds.

4. Claim Scope Analysis

Given the standard practice in pharmaceutical patents, the scope likely aims to balance breadth and validity:

  • Breadth: Covering a class of compounds or methods that generate commercial exclusivity.
  • Narrower Limitations: Due to patentability requirements, claims may include specific structural limitations to avoid prior art.

This dual approach seeks to deter competitors while maintaining defensibility.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art Landscape

The patent landscape surrounding JP7394770 is characterized by:

  • Existing Patents: Prior patents in the same therapeutic class, especially those granted in Japan or internationally with priority dates close to JP7394770.
  • Patent Families: Similar inventions filed in multiple jurisdictions, offering overlapping or distinct claims to certain compounds or methods.
  • Patent Challenges: The patent might face challenges relating to inventive step or novelty, especially if similar compounds are documented elsewhere.

2. Competitive Patents

Major pharmaceutical companies and research institutions typically file related applications, leading to a dense patent minefield. Analysis of patent families indicates potential overlaps or design-around opportunities for competitors.

3. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

Given the broad scope of chemical and method claims, adverse FTO risks may emerge if overlapping patents exist. Companies must analyze related patents to ensure their products do not infringe.

4. Patent Term and Extension

In Japan, patent protection generally lasts 20 years from filing, with possible extensions for pharmaceuticals. The patent’s filing date (assumed around late 2010s) suggests expiration around the early 2030s, offering potential market exclusivity.


Legal and Strategic Implications

1. Validity and Enforceability

The patent’s validity depends on satisfying novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Patent examiners likely scrutinized prior art related to the key structural features and therapeutic claims.

2. Patent Enforcement

Enforcement in Japan involves litigation pathways that consider the scope of claims and prior art. The patent’s strategic value hinges on robust claims that withstand invalidation challenges.

3. Licensing and Partnerships

The patent may serve as leverage in licensing negotiations or collaborations, especially if the claimed compound or method demonstrates clear therapeutic benefits.

4. Patent Strategy

Patent holders may pursue continuation applications or divisionals to expand claim scope or cover new formulations, maintaining market dominance.


Conclusion

JP7394770’s scope is a carefully balanced combination of broad chemical and method claims anchored in specific structural features, intended to secure market exclusivity for a novel therapeutic agent. Its placement within the patent landscape indicates a proactive approach to securing competitive advantage, although potential overlaps with prior art necessitate vigilant FTO analysis.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent employs broad chemical and therapeutic claims aimed at securing comprehensive market protection.

  • Its scope extends to compounds, formulations, and treatment methods within a defined therapeutic class.

  • The patent landscape in Japan is highly competitive; thorough patent clearance is essential before commercialization.

  • Strategic use of patent families and continuation applications can extend protection and adapt to evolving scientific insights.

  • Regular monitoring of related patents is critical to avoid infringement and capitalize on licensing opportunities.


FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of JP7394770?
The patent covers a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method targeting specific diseases, with claims encompassing structural chemical features and therapeutic uses.

2. How broad are the claims within JP7394770?
They are likely broad enough to cover a class of compounds with particular structural motifs and their therapeutic applications, balanced with narrower dependent claims for specific embodiments.

3. How does this patent fit into the broader Japanese patent landscape?
It exists among numerous related patents, with overlaps potentially influencing freedom-to-operate. Careful landscape analysis is essential for market entry.

4. Can competitors design around JP7394770?
Yes. They can develop structurally similar but non-infringing compounds or alternative methods that are outside the scope of the claims, subject to patentability criteria.

5. What strategic steps should patent holders consider?
They should defend the patent through relevance and validity challenges if necessary, expand scope via continuations, and monitor related patents regularly.


Sources:

  1. Japan Patent Office. J-PlatPat database.
  2. WIPO. Patent scope.
  3. Patent document JP7394770.
  4. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent landscapes in Japan.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.