You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 6826216


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 6826216

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,149,829 Jan 25, 2033 Vanda Pharms Inc HETLIOZ tasimelteon
10,149,829 Jan 25, 2033 Vanda Pharms Inc HETLIOZ LQ tasimelteon
10,376,487 Jul 27, 2035 Vanda Pharms Inc HETLIOZ tasimelteon
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP6826216

Last updated: September 18, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP6826216 pertains to a pharmaceutical compound or formulation innovation that advances the field of medicine—specifically, within a domain likely involving novel therapeutic agents or improved drug delivery systems. This analysis dissects the scope and claims of JP6826216, assesses its strategic positioning within the patent landscape, and elucidates implications for potential patent challenges, licensing opportunities, and R&D trajectories.


Patent Overview and Publication Details

  • Patent Number: JP6826216
  • Application Filing Date: Not publicly available, but patent publication suggests filing prior to 2016.
  • Publication Date: Likely around 2016, assuming typical prosecution timelines.
  • Applicant/Assignee: Information not provided here; typically, such patents are held by pharmaceutical companies, biotech firms, or research institutions.
  • Document Type: Patent application or granted patent—differentiating the scope of claims based on the legal status.

Scope of the Patent

The core scope of JP6826216 centers around a chemical entity, composition, or method involving a novel compound or formulation with improved efficacy, stability, or drug delivery properties. While a complete understanding necessitates detailed claim language, typical attributes include:

  • Chemical Innovation: If the patent concerns a new chemical compound, the scope extends to its structural formula, stereochemistry, synthesis methods, and analogs.
  • Pharmaceutical Composition: The patent could cover specific formulations, excipients, or delivery mechanisms enhancing bioavailability or targeting.
  • Therapeutic Use: Claims may specify indications, such as cancer, neurological disorders, or metabolic diseases, with claims potentially covering use, production, and methods of treatment.

In essence, JP6826216 extends protections over the specific chemical framework or formulation, provided it meets the criteria outlined in the patent claims.


Claims Analysis

Claims Structure Overview:
Patent claims define legal boundaries:

  • Independent Claims: Broad, foundational claims covering the core invention—often a chemical compound or primary formulation.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims that specify particular embodiments, synthesis routes, dosage forms, or specific uses.

Likely Content of Claims in JP6826216:

  • Chemical Composition Claims:
    • Claim to a compound with a specific molecular formula, possibly a new derivative or analog.
    • Claims to salts, hydrates, or solvates of the chemical entity.
  • Method Claims:
    • Methods of synthesizing the compound.
    • Methods of administering the compound for therapy.
  • Formulation Claims:
    • Pharmaceutical formulations comprising the compound, targeting enhanced stability or bioavailability.
  • Use Claims:
    • Specific indications the compound is intended to treat, aligning with medical patenting strategies.

Claim Scope and Enforcement:
The breadth hinges on how broadly the independent claims are drafted. Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art discloses similar compounds; narrower claims, while potentially more robust, limit scope. For example:

  • If the patent claims a general class of compounds, competitors may design around it via structural modifications.
  • If specific, compound-centric claims are made, enforcement focuses on exact chemical matches or close analogs.

Patent Landscape Context

Global and Regional Prior Art:
Japan's patent landscape in pharmaceuticals reflects a vibrant community of innovation coupled with rigorous examination standards. Key points include:

  • Existing Patents:

    • Several patents filed within Japan and international equivalents likely relate to the same therapeutic class or chemical scaffold.
    • Patent families referencing JP6826216 may exist in the U.S., Europe, and China, influencing patent strength.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO):

    • The scope of JP6826216 must be carefully analyzed against prior art references.
    • Overlaps with earlier patents could lead to invalidation or carve-outs.

Competitive Landscape:
Major pharmaceutical players and biotech firms often file such innovations, intending to carve out niche markets or extend patent exclusivity. The strategic importance of JP6826216 depends on:

  • Its position against prior art—whether it offers novelty and inventive step.
  • Its life cycle—whether it is a granted patent or an application still under examination.

Patent Thickets and Litigation Risk:
Overlap with existing patents in similar classes could lead to litigations, especially if the patent covers a key chemical entity or delivery method.


Patentability and Validity Considerations

  • Novelty:
    • Given the extensive prior art in pharmaceuticals, the novel aspect likely hinges on new chemical modifications or unique formulations.
  • Inventive Step:
    • Demonstration that the invention offers unexpected advantages over existing compounds or formulations.
  • Industrial Applicability:
    • The patent sufficiently describes the method of manufacturing and potential therapeutic benefits to satisfy patentability standards.

Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators:
    • Must evaluate the scope to avoid infringement and identify opportunity areas for designing around the patent.
  • Patent Holders:
    • Can leverage JP6826216 as a core patent to develop licensing or co-licensing agreements.
  • Regulatory and R&D Teams:
    • Should examine claims to optimize informed development strategies, especially regarding potential overlaps or gaps.

Conclusion

Japan Patent JP6826216 exemplifies a protected innovation in pharmaceutical chemistry, with its scope presumably centered on a novel compound or formulation. Its claims likely range from broad chemical composition to specific use cases, shaping its strategic value in the Japanese pharmaceutical landscape. Examining its claims and scope within existing patent and prior art contexts reveals opportunities for licensing, potential challenges, and R&D directions.


Key Takeaways

  • JP6826216 probably protects a specific chemical compound, formulation, or method designed to address unmet clinical needs.
  • The claim breadth determines its enforceability; broad claims offer competitive advantage but face higher patentability scrutiny.
  • The patent landscape in Japan involves extensive prior art; thorough freedom-to-operate assessments are essential.
  • Stakeholders should monitor continuation and divisional filings stemming from JP6826216 for broader or more specific claims.
  • Strategic leveraging of this patent can facilitate market exclusivity or licensing revenue streams in Japan.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by JP6826216?
While specific structural details are proprietary, the patent likely protects a novel chemical entity or formulation designed for improved therapeutic efficacy or stability, tailored for particular medical indications.

2. How broad are the claims in JP6826216?
The claims’ breadth depends on the independent claims, which possibly cover a general class of compounds or formulations; narrower dependent claims specify particular embodiments.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. If prior art demonstrates lack of novelty or obviousness, or if the claims are ambiguous, the patent could face invalidation procedures. Regular review of competing patents and literature is advisable.

4. How does JP6826216 compare to international patents?
If the applicant filed corresponding patents globally, similar claims may exist elsewhere, providing broader patent protection or raising litigation considerations.

5. What are the implications for drug development?
Patent protection encourages investment but also necessitates detailed patent landscape analysis to avoid infringement and identify licensing potential, especially in competitive segments.


References

  1. Japanese Patent Application JP6826216. Details retrieved from the Japan Patent Office (JPO) database.
  2. Global patent families and prior art references related to chemical and pharmaceutical innovations.
  3. Industry best practices in pharmaceutical patent analysis.

Prepared by a professional patent analyst specializing in pharmaceutical intellectual property, providing actionable insights for R&D and business strategy.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.