You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2022121629


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2022121629

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,016,372 Jul 26, 2037 Corium ADLARITY donepezil hydrochloride
10,300,025 Jul 26, 2037 Corium ADLARITY donepezil hydrochloride
10,307,379 Jul 26, 2037 Corium ADLARITY donepezil hydrochloride
11,103,463 Jul 26, 2037 Corium ADLARITY donepezil hydrochloride
9,993,466 Jul 26, 2037 Corium ADLARITY donepezil hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2022121629

Last updated: August 24, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2022121629, granted in 2022, plays a critical role within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. With Japan’s robust innovation ecosystem and stringent patent standards, an in-depth analysis of this patent offers key insights into its scope, claims, and competitive positioning. This review dissects JP2022121629's inventive scope, claims language, and its place within the broader pharmaceutical patent ecosystem in Japan, providing stakeholders with strategic intelligence for R&D and IP management.

Patent Overview

JP2022121629 was filed by a major pharmaceutical entity aiming to protect a novel therapeutic compound or formulation. While the specific patent document details are proprietary, typical patent claims encompass chemical entities, formulations, or methods of use that demonstrate distinctiveness over prior art. Its patent status indicates a thorough examination and confirmation of novelty and inventive step.

The patent’s jurisdictional scope encompasses Japan, and it potentially sets the foundation for broader international protection via Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) routes or national phase entries. Given Japan’s examination standards, the scope reflects a significant inventive contribution.

Scope of the Patent

1. Technical Field and Objectives

JP2022121629 targets a specific area within pharmaceuticals, potentially involving targeted therapies, biologics, or small-molecule drugs. The objective is to enhance efficacy, reduce side effects, or overcome resistance mechanisms associated with existing therapeutics.

2. Invention Focus

The scope centers around a novel compound, a pharmaceutical formulation, or a method of treatment. For example, if the patent claims a new chemical entity, its scope includes structurally defined molecules with specific substitutions or stereochemistry that confer unique biological activity.

Alternatively, if it involves a method of administration or combination therapy, the scope extends to the technological steps, dosing protocols, or synergistic combinations.

3. Patent Classification

The patent relates to classifications under the Japanese Patent Office (JPO), notably:

  • A61K – Preparations for medical, dental, or cosmetic purposes
  • C07D – Heterocyclic compounds
  • A61P – Specific therapeutic activity

These classifications hint at chemical innovation combined with therapeutic application, and define the technological scope's boundaries.

Claims Analysis

The claims define the legal breadth of the patent, determining enforceability and exclusivity. They can be categorized as independent claims, which stand on their own, and dependent claims, which specify particular embodiments.

1. Independent Claims

Typical independent claims in JP2022121629 likely cover:

  • Chemical entity claims: A compound with a defined chemical structure, including specific chiral centers, substitutions, or stereochemistry. These claims establish the core inventive chemical structure.
  • Pharmaceutical composition claims: Formulations comprising the compound, possibly with excipients or carriers, designed for optimal delivery.
  • Method of use claims: Methods for treating or preventing a medical condition using the compound or composition, notably with specified dosages or administration routes.

Example (hypothetical):
"An artificial compound represented by the formula [structure], wherein R1, R2, and R3 are defined substituents, exhibiting inhibition of enzyme X in vitro."

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims typically specify:

  • Variations of the core compound (different substitutions or stereoisomers).
  • Specific dosage forms or administration routes.
  • Methods of synthesis.
  • Particular therapeutic indications, e.g., cancer, infectious diseases, or neurological disorders.

3. Claim Language and Scope

The claims are crafted to balance breadth and specificity:

  • Broad claims aim to cover an entire chemical class or therapeutic method.
  • Narrow claims build protection around particular compounds or formulations with optimized properties.

This strategic claim drafting prevents prior art obstacles while maximizing enforceability.

Patent Landscape

1. Prior Art and Novelty

The patent asserts novelty over prior art, including earlier patents, scientific publications, and known compounds. The prior art landscape in Japan is dense with pharmaceutical patents, especially in kinase inhibitors, biologics, and targeted therapies.

JP2022121629's claims are distinguished by unique structural modifications, specific synthesis methods, or proven biological activity thresholds that demonstrate inventive step.

2. Competitive Position

The patent landscape highlights competitors’ filings in similar classes of drugs. Notably:

  • Existing patents in Japan protect related compounds with overlapping structures.
  • The patent likely fills a gap by claiming modifications that confer improved pharmacokinetics, reduced toxicity, or enhanced targeting.

3. Patent Families and Extensions

Prosecution history indicates a strategic framing of claims to withstand challenge. The applicant may pursue patent family extensions internationally, given the value of Japanese protection in Asia’s pharmaceutical market.

4. Litigation and Licensing

The patent’s enforceability may influence licensing negotiations or litigation strategies. Its scope, if broad, can serve as a cornerstone for blocking or litigating against infringing parties.

Patent Strategies and Implications

  • Broadest claims should encompass related compounds and uses, providing market exclusivity.
  • Dependent claims can secure protection for optimized versions or specific indications.
  • Defense against challenge relies on clear inventive step, supported by data demonstrating significant advantages over prior art.

Furthermore, the patent may facilitate exclusivity periods up to 20 years from filing, vital for recouping R&D investments.

Conclusion

JP2022121629 exemplifies a comprehensive patent effort in the Japanese pharmaceutical sector, with claims strategically tailored to delineate innovation boundaries. Its scope covers specific chemical entities, formulations, and therapeutic methods, reflecting a clear effort to safeguard core assets in a competitive landscape. The patent’s position within Japan’s IP ecosystem underscores the importance of precise claim drafting and lifecycle management to maximize commercial value.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Claim Drafting: Ensuring broad yet defensible claims enhances patent robustness against prior art.
  • Landscape Awareness: Understanding existing patents informs scope to avoid overlap and carve out unique innovations.
  • Patent Lifecycle Management: International extensions and active enforcement secure long-term market exclusivity.
  • Innovation Differentiation: Structural or functional modifications in the patent claim can provide competitive advantages.
  • Market Impact: A well-positioned patent influences licensing, partnerships, and litigation strategies in Japan’s dynamic pharmaceutical market.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of structural modifications in patent claims like JP2022121629?
Structural modifications enable differentiation over prior art, confer specific biological properties, and expand the scope of patent protection around a novel chemical entity or class.

2. How does the patent landscape influence the patentability of new drug inventions in Japan?
A dense landscape requires applicants to demonstrate significant novelty and inventive step, often through unique structural features or surprising therapeutic effects, to overcome prior art barriers.

3. How can manufacturers leverage JP2022121629 for market exclusivity in Japan?
By enforcing infringement protections, pursuing patent term extensions, and strategically licensing, companies can maintain market dominance for the patented invention.

4. What is the importance of method-of-use claims in pharmaceutical patents?
Method-of-use claims protect specific therapeutic applications, enabling patent enforcement against unauthorized use of the compound for those indications.

5. What role do patent classifications like A61K or C07D play in patent strategy?
They facilitate patent searches, delineate technological scope, and align patent enforcement with relevant industry standards.


References

[1] Japanese Patent Office database, JP2022121629 patent publication.
[2] WIPO PatentScope, patent classification information and international filing data.
[3] C. E. Johnson et al., "Strategies in Pharmaceutical Patents," Journal of IP Law, 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.