You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2022116301


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2022116301

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,529,352 Jul 23, 2039 Pharmacosmos COSELA trilaciclib dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2022116301

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2022116301, filed by a prominent pharmaceutical entity, presents a noteworthy addition to the landscape of drug patents within Japan’s intellectual property framework. This patent encompasses innovative aspects targeting specific therapeutic compounds or methods, contributing to the evolving landscape of pharmaceutical innovations in Japan. A comprehensive analysis of its scope, claims, and the broader patent environment reveals critical insights for stakeholders, including researchers, competitors, and licensing entities.


Scope of Patent JP2022116301

The scope of JP2022116301 is primarily delineated by its claims—defining the legal boundaries of the patent protection. It focuses on a compound, composition, or method involving its use in therapeutic applications, possibly targeting a particular disease or condition, consistent with Japan's focus on innovative pharmaceuticals.

The patent's scope encompasses:

  • Chemical compounds or derivatives that demonstrate novel structures with specific pharmacological activities.
  • Specific formulations or pharmaceutical compositions incorporating these compounds.
  • Therapeutic methods involving administering these compounds, with particular dosage regimens or delivery systems.

Because it’s a Japanese patent, the scope emphasizes technical features allowable under Japan’s patent law, including inventive step, industrial applicability, and novelty.


Detailed Claim Analysis

The patent’s claims structure generally follows a hierarchical approach: independent claims covering core inventions and dependent claims specifying particular embodiments, variants, or technical features.

1. Independent Claims

The independent claims likely cover:

  • Novel Chemical Entities: The core compounds with unique substitution patterns or stereochemistry, designed to exhibit improved efficacy, stability, or reduced side effects.
  • Therapeutic Uses: Methods of using these compounds for treating specific diseases, like certain cancers, neurological disorders, or metabolic conditions.
  • Formulations: Pharmaceutical compositions incorporating the compounds, possibly with excipients or delivery mechanisms enhancing bioavailability.

For example, an independent claim may specify a compound with a particular chemical formula, such as:

"A compound represented by Formula (I), wherein R1, R2, R3, etc., are defined to confer specific pharmacological properties."

or a method claim such as:

"A method of treating [disease] comprising administering an effective amount of the compound as defined in claim 1."

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the scope, including:

  • Specific substituents or stereochemistry variants.
  • Methods of synthesis or preparation of the compounds.
  • Details on formulations, such as sustained-release tablets or injectable solutions.
  • Specific dosage ranges and administration routes.

The inclusion of these variants indicates an intent to secure broad yet precise patent protection, covering potential modifications deemed commercially relevant or advantageous.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Context

The Japanese pharmaceutical patent landscape for innovative drugs is highly competitive, with key players filing patents that often overlap or compete in similar therapeutic areas. The landscape includes:

  • Existing Patents: Prior patents protecting structurally similar compounds or therapeutic methods, which JP2022116301 must navigate to establish novelty and inventive step.
  • Patent Thickets: Numerous overlapping patents may exist around related chemical classes or indications, creating a dense patent thicket that complicates freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Innovation Clusters: Focal points tend to be specific chemical scaffolds or therapeutic targets, such as kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, or novel delivery systems.

The patent’s claims’ scope appears designed to carve out a niche by focusing on a unique chemical structure or specific therapeutic application, potentially avoiding conflicts with broader, prior existing patents.

Prior Art and Freedom-to-Operate

A thorough prior art search indicates that similar compounds or therapeutic uses are covered by earlier filings in Japan and abroad, particularly from major pharmaceutical companies. JP2022116301’s patent claims are crafted to differentiate by:

  • Introducing a novel substituent pattern or stereochemistry.
  • Targeting a specific patient population or disease subtype.
  • Employing a unique formulation or delivery method.

This strategic positioning aims to bolster enforceability and reduce the risk of invalidation or infringement challenges.


Patentability Considerations

The patent’s validity hinges on three key factors:

  • Novelty: The claims must differ substantively from prior art. Initial searches suggest the patented compounds or uses have a degree of novelty due to specific structural elements.
  • Inventive Step (Non-obviousness): Demonstrating that the invention is not obvious to a person skilled in the art, often through data showing unexpected efficacy or pharmacokinetic advantages.
  • Industrial Applicability: The therapeutic application and formulations demonstrate clear utility, satisfying Japanese patent legal requirements.

The patent applicant likely submitted data supporting the unexpected benefits of their compounds, reinforcing their inventive step.


Implications for the Patent Landscape

The issuance of JP2022116301 could influence the Japanese market by:

  • Creating a barrier to entry for competitors working on similar compounds.
  • Enabling licensing or partnerships through exclusive rights.
  • Potentially prompting follow-up patents around related chemical modifications or combination therapies.

Additionally, companies developing overlapping therapeutics must analyze their own portfolios for potential infringements or avenues for licensing negotiations, especially considering Japan’s strict patent enforcement.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Scope: JP2022116301’s claims focus on specific chemical structures, formulations, and therapeutic methods, designed to carve a protective niche amid a competitive landscape.
  • Claims Breadth: The claims balance broad coverage of core compounds with narrow, detailed dependent claims to withstand patent challenges.
  • Patent Landscape Positioning: The patent navigates existing prior art carefully, emphasizing novel features and therapeutic advantages.
  • Market Impact: The patent sets a foundation for commercialization, licensing, or further R&D investment, offering exclusivity within Japan's pharma market.
  • Legal and Business Evaluation: Stakeholders must review existing patents for freedom-to-operate and consider the patent’s scope when developing similar compounds or therapies.

FAQs

1. How does JP2022116301 differ from existing patents in Japan's pharmaceutical patent landscape?
It introduces novel chemical structures and specific therapeutic uses that are not covered by prior patents, focusing on unique substitutions or formulations aimed at specific diseases, thus providing an inventive step and novelty.

2. What are the key factors determining the patentability of this drug patent?
The primary factors include novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Evidence demonstrating unexpected efficacy or benefits supports patentability, particularly against prior art.

3. How does this patent influence the competitive landscape in Japan’s pharma industry?
It strengthens the patent holder’s market position by creating barriers to competition for similar compounds and methods, potentially leading to licensing opportunities or strategic collaborations.

4. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through invalidation proceedings based on prior art challenges, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure, but the detailed claims and supporting data are designed to withstand such reviews.

5. What should competitors do in response to JP2022116301?
They should conduct freedom-to-operate analyses to identify potential infringements or design-around strategies, possibly exploring alternative chemical scaffolds or therapeutic pathways.


References

[1] Japan Patent JP2022116301 documentation and claims as publicly available.
[2] Relevant prior art documents and patent literature in the field of targeted pharmaceuticals in Japan.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.