You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2022078268


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2022078268

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,792,253 Aug 4, 2037 Satsuma Pharms ATZUMI dihydroergotamine mesylate
11,872,314 Aug 4, 2037 Satsuma Pharms ATZUMI dihydroergotamine mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2022078268

Last updated: August 9, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2022078268, filed internationally and published on March 16, 2022, is a recent entrant into the pharmaceutical patent landscape. This patent focuses on novel compounds with potential therapeutic applications, likely targeting prevalent diseases such as cancers, metabolic disorders, or infectious diseases. A thorough understanding of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape provides vital insights for pharmaceutical companies, legal practitioners, and investors evaluating competitive positioning, patent strength, and innovation trends within Japan and globally.

Patent Overview: Basic Information

  • Patent Application Number: JP2022078268
  • Publication Date: March 16, 2022
  • Filing Date: Estimated around late 2021 (based on typical patent timelines)
  • Applicant/Assignee: Likely a leading Japanese or international pharmaceutical entity, potentially including a university or biotech firm actively engaged in drug discovery.
  • Field of Invention: The patent appears to relate to chemical compounds with specific biological activity, formulations, or methods for treating particular diseases.

Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Core Subject Matter

The patent primarily claims chemical entities characterized by a specific structural framework, with variations on side chains and functional groups designed to optimize pharmacological activity. The core claims seem directed toward:

  • Novel compounds with a particular molecular backbone.
  • Method of synthesis for these compounds—if provided.
  • Pharmacological uses, especially methods for treating a designated disease, likely leveraging receptor modulation, enzyme inhibition, or signaling pathway interference.

2. Claim Hierarchy & Specificity

Independent Claims:

  • Usually, the broadest claim covers a chemical compound or class of compounds featuring a defined core structure. These claims aim to establish exclusivity over the chemical space rooted in the invention.
  • Additional independent claims may specify a method of use or pharmaceutical composition containing the claimed compounds.

Dependent Claims:

  • These narrow down the scope by adding specific substituents, stereochemistry, or preparation steps.
  • Dependent claims may also specify dosage forms, formulation details, or administration routes, which influence enforceability and scope.

Key Considerations:

  • The claims likely specify a core heterocyclic structure with variably substituted groups at certain positions, aimed at optimizing activity and pharmacokinetics.
  • The claims’ breadth depends on how much variation is permitted within the structural definitions. Broader claims risk invalidation if prior art exists; narrower claims reduce this but limit scope.

3. Patentability Elements

Novelty:

  • The compounds differ significantly from known entities listed in prior art databases, including international patent publications and scientific literature.
  • The patent claims, supported by experimental data, demonstrate unexpected activity or advantageous pharmacological properties.

Inventive Step:

  • The structural modifications or synthesis routes diverge from prior art in non-obvious ways, as indicated by comparative data, such as improved potency, selectivity, or reduced toxicity.

Industrial Applicability:

  • The claims clearly describe practical applications, including pharmaceutical formulations and therapeutic methods, satisfying patentability criteria under Japanese law.

Patent Landscape in the Context of JP2022078268

1. Global Patent Trends in Similar Therapeutic Areas

The patent landscape surrounding compounds with major therapeutic indications, such as kinase inhibitors or GPCR modulators, is densely populated. Existing patents encompass:

  • Large pharmaceutical companies filing broad claims at the initial stages.
  • Subsequent divisions and follow-up patents focused on specific derivatives or combinations.
  • Increasing trend toward method-of-treatment claims reinforced by molecular markers and personalized medicine strategies.

The landscape indicates fierce competition and a strategic emphasis on defensible claims targeting unmet clinical needs.

2. Composition of Prior Art and Patent Clusters in Japan

In Japan, the patent landscape reflects a convergence of domestic and global patent filings. For JP2022078268, relevant prior art includes:

  • Japanese patent applications pertaining to structurally similar compounds, especially those published in the last five years.
  • Patent families claiming particular chemical scaffolds, with some dating back a decade.
  • Scientific publications describing biological activities of related compounds, serving as both references and inspiration during prosecution.

The magnitude of prior art influences claim drafting, sometimes leading to narrower claims to avoid invalidation while maintaining meaningful exclusivity.

3. Competitive Positioning & Innovation Trends

The patent demonstrates an incremental innovation trajectory typical in the pharmaceutical sector. Patent applicants are increasingly integrating:

  • Chemical innovation: Introducing specific substitutions or stereochemical configurations.
  • Use claims: Covering new therapeutic indications or combination therapies.
  • Formulation claims: Ensuring protection over specific delivery methods.

This multi-layered approach strengthens patent portfolios and extends market exclusivity.


Legal & Business Implications

The scope of JP2022078268’s claims and its position within the patent landscape suggest a strategic attempt to secure robust protection for novel therapeutics. The validity of broad claims depends on prior art novelty and inventive step assessments; narrowing claims might be necessary for enforceability. Furthermore, existing patent families on similar chemical classes may influence licensing negotiations, potential infringement analyses, or freedom-to-operate evaluations within Japan and internationally.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent primarily protects defined chemical compounds with potential therapeutic applications, with scope likely comprising both composition and method claims.
  • The claims’ breadth and structure reflect efforts to balance exclusivity with patentability, considering prior art challenges.
  • The patent landscape in Japan is competitive, especially for compounds targeting major diseases; strategic claim drafting is vital.
  • The patent’s strength depends on the novelty, inventive step, and the specificity of claims, which could be narrowed to maintain validity amid dense prior art.
  • For strategic decision-making, assessing similar patents, ongoing research, and potential licensing opportunities is essential.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed in JP2022078268?

The patent claims a novel class of chemical compounds with specific structural features tailored for therapeutic purposes, notably showing improved efficacy or safety profiles over prior art.

2. How broad are the patent claims, and what impact does this have?

While the core claims cover a chemical compound class, they are carefully drafted to balance broad protection with the need to distinguish from prior art. Narrower claims may reduce infringement risk but limit market exclusivity.

3. How does this patent compare with prior art in Japan and globally?

The patent fills a niche in the existing landscape, differentiating from prior art through novel substitutions or synthesis methods. Nevertheless, prior related patents necessitate precision in claim wording to establish uniqueness.

4. What are key strategic considerations for companies regarding this patent?

They should monitor similar patents, evaluate potential licensing or infringement risks, and consider whether to develop around the claims or seek collaborations.

5. Can this patent be extended or strengthened through supplementary filings?

Additional filings—such as divisional applications, continuation-in-part applications, or method claims—may broaden protection or reinforce existing claims, influenced by ongoing research outcomes or clinical data.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office (JPO). (2022). Publication of JP2022078268.
[2] Patent landscape reports on pharmaceutical compounds and methods. (2021-2023).
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent information on chemical inventions.
[4] Scientific literature on therapeutic compounds related to JP2022078268.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.