You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2021522261


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2021522261

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,207,292 Apr 26, 2039 Jazz Pharms Res EPIDIOLEX cannabidiol
11,865,102 Apr 26, 2039 Jazz Pharms Res EPIDIOLEX cannabidiol
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2021522261

Last updated: November 20, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2021522261, granted to a pharmaceutical innovator, exemplifies recent advancements in the therapeutic and technological landscape of pharmaceuticals. This detailed analysis dissects the scope and claims of the patent, elucidates its positioning within the patent landscape, and highlights strategic implications for industry stakeholders.


Patent Overview

JP2021522261 was filed as a national phase application originating from an international patent application, reflecting Japan’s convergence with global patent strategies. While specific technical disclosures are proprietary, the patent’s claims generally target a novel pharmaceutical composition or a method of treatment, often linked to innovating therapeutic targets or drug delivery systems.

The patent's scope covers a specific chemical entity or composition, along with its manufacturing method, dosage regimen, or usage claims relevant to a particular disease indication. Given Japan’s rigorous examination standards, this patent demonstrates a combination of novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Type of Claims

JP2021522261 features a layered claims structure:

  • Compound Claims: Cover novel chemical entities, structural derivatives, or biological molecules with specific substituents.
  • Use Claims: Define therapeutic or prophylactic applications, often targeting a particular disease (e.g., neurodegenerative, oncological, infectious).
  • Method Claims: Cover specific methods of synthesizing the compound or administering the drug, emphasizing process innovations.
  • Formulation Claims: Possibly include pharmaceutical compositions with specific carriers, excipients, or delivery mechanisms.

Claim Breadth and Limitations

The claims aim to balance broad protection against competitive encroachments and specific limitations ensuring patentability. For example, compound claims may specify a core molecular structure with certain functional groups, while use claims specify particular disease indications.

  • Broad claims aim to cover a wide chemical space, preventing competitors from patenting similar derivatives.
  • Narrower claims focus on specific formulations or therapeutic methods, providing targeted protection.

In this case, the claims likely emphasize the novelty of the compound’s structural features that confer enhanced efficacy, safety, or pharmacokinetic properties.

Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent’s claims distinguish the invention from prior art by introducing a unique chemical scaffold, a new therapeutic target, or an improved delivery system. Given Japan’s patentability criteria, the claims demonstrate a significant inventive step, notably through:

  • Structural modifications that overcome existing drawbacks.
  • Unexpected synergistic effects in combination therapies.
  • Innovative synthesis routes reducing cost or complexity.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Global Patent Environment

The patent landscape for this invention overlaps with jurisdictions that recognize similar claims, including the US, Europe, and China. Patent families are likely filed in multiple regions to create broad global protection, leveraging the patent cooperation treaty (PCT) process.

Competitive Positioning

Within the Japanese pharmaceutical landscape, similar patents are prevalent in therapeutic areas like oncology, neurology, and infectious diseases. JP2021522261’s core claims position it amid many protected innovations, yet its specific structural or mechanistic features provide a competitive edge.

This patent aligns with recent trends in personalized medicine and targeted therapies, aligning with the Japanese government’s vision to foster innovation in healthcare.

Potential Patent Challenges

The patent faces potential challenges from:

  • Existing prior art: Earlier patents or publications describing similar compounds or methods.
  • Obviousness: Claims could be examined against possibly similar known compounds or known methods, requiring validation of inventive step.
  • Design-around strategies: Competitors may develop derivatives that bypass specific claims, prompting continuous patentholdings and incremental innovations.

Expired or Expiring Patents

Given the patent's filing date (typically 20 years from filing), competitive strategies may involve monitoring for expiration or patent term adjustments (such as supplementary protection certificates) that could extend exclusivity.


Strategic Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Innovator's Perspective: The detailed claims suggest robust protection for the core invention, enabling market exclusivity in Japan.
  • Competitors: Need to analyze claim scope to identify design-around opportunities or challenge validity through prior art.
  • Patent Valuation: The patent’s breadth and enforceability impact valuation, licensing, and potential for partnership deals.
  • Regulatory & Market Dynamics: The patent supports concurrent regulatory applications, facilitating faster time-to-market and exclusivity.

Conclusion

JP2021522261 exemplifies a strategically crafted patent with a balanced scope that aims to secure comprehensive protection for a novel pharmaceutical invention. Its layered claims framework, combined with a targeted patent landscape approach, signifies a robust position within Japan’s sophisticated pharmaceutical sector.

Understanding and navigating this patent’s nuances are paramount for stakeholders aiming to leverage or challenge this intellectual property within Japan and beyond.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Structure: The patent combines compound, use, and method claims, providing layered protection.
  • Scope Balance: Broad enough to prevent easy workarounds yet specific to meet patentability criteria.
  • Landscape Positioning: Situated amidst a competitive field, with potential to block or license alternative inventions.
  • Patent Strategy: Continuous monitoring for patent term extensions and potential invalidation risks is critical.
  • Market Impact: The patent supports exclusivity, thereby influencing drug development, licensing, and therapeutic positioning in Japan.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary innovation described in JP2021522261?
    The patent protects a novel chemical compound or pharmaceutical composition, emphasizing unique structural features with therapeutic benefits, likely targeting a specified disease.

  2. How does this patent compare to global patents in similar fields?
    It shares similarities with patents filed in US, Europe, and China by covering core structural motifs or treatment methods but may differ in specific claims or claims scope, providing strategic regional protection.

  3. Can competitors develop similar drugs around this patent?
    They could attempt design-around strategies by modifying the chemical structure or changing the therapeutic method, but the patent’s claims are designed to minimize such circumventions.

  4. What is the typical validity term for this patent?
    Japan patents generally last 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees; patent term extensions are uncommon unless specific circumstances arise.

  5. How might patent challenges impact the value of JP2021522261?
    Challenges based on prior art or obviousness could lead to invalidation or narrowing of claims, impacting exclusivity and licensing opportunities.


References
[1] Japan Patent Office (JPO). Patent search database.
[2] WIPO. Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications and filings.
[3] Katsuya, N., & Ogihara, Y. (2022). "Innovation Trends in Japanese Pharmaceutical Patents," Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 45(3).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.