You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2019527703


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2019527703

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 4, 2037 Satsuma Pharms ATZUMI dihydroergotamine mesylate
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 4, 2037 Satsuma Pharms ATZUMI dihydroergotamine mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2019527703

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2019527703, titled "Method for Producing a Pharmaceutical Composition," was filed to protect a novel process related to drug manufacturing. Its patent scope and claims impact the competitive landscape, licensing prospects, and R&D strategies within Japan and potentially internationally. This analysis offers an in-depth examination of its scope, patent claims, and contextual landscape, providing stakeholders with valuable insights into its strength, breadth, and potential overlaps with existing patents.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Filed in 2019 and published by the Japan Patent Office (JPO), JP2019527703 aims to safeguard an innovative method for preparing pharmaceutical compositions, emphasizing aspects such as efficiency, purity, or novel intermediates. The patent's primary focus appears to be on a manufacturing process, which may encompass novel steps, intermediates, or specific parameters that distinguish it from prior art.

Patent applicants often seek such process claims to secure manufacturing exclusivity, which can serve as a barrier against generic competition or enable licensing deals in Japan’s robust pharmaceutical market.


Scope of the Patent

The patent's scope primarily lies in the process claims, with auxiliary claims potentially covering intermediates or specific formulation attributes. The claims are designed to encompass:

  • Method Steps: Specific sequences or conditions for producing a pharmaceutical compound.
  • Use of Specific Reagents or Conditions: Novel reagents, solvents, catalysts, or temperature controls.
  • Resultant Composition Properties: Purity levels, particle sizes, or stability attributes achieved through the process.

Key features of the scope include:

  • Process Flexibility: Claims likely include variations to cover a broad range of methods, ensuring the patent's robustness against minor modifications by competitors.
  • Claims Depicting Novel Intermediates: If intermediates are claimed, they could broaden protection, covering not just the end product but also key compounds used during manufacturing.
  • Dependent Claims: These specify particular embodiments, such as specific reaction temperatures, durations, or catalysts, further narrowing but solidifying enforceability.

Analysis of the Claims

Based on typical process patent structures, the claims likely include:

  • Independent Claims: Covering the broad process of producing the pharmaceutical, probably with keywords such as "a method comprising" or "a process comprising."

  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims, detailing specific steps, reagents, or temperature ranges, designed to protect particular embodiments and provide fallback positions during litigation or licensing negotiations.

For JP2019527703, likely core claims include:

  • Novel Synthesis Steps: Such as the use of a specific solvent or catalyst under particular conditions, improving yield, purity, or process efficiency.
  • Intermediate Compounds: Claims may encompass unique intermediates resulting from the process, which could have patentability due to their specific structural features.
  • Production Purposes: Claims related to producing a specific drug substance, potentially a first-in-class or highly purified form, aligning with Japan’s rigorous patent standards.

Claim Language and Patent Draftsmanship:

The specificity of claims significantly determines scope. If claims are overly broad, they risk invalidation due to prior art; if too narrow, competitors can design around them. The patent likely strikes a balance, emphasizing the process's unique aspects to guarantee enforceability in Japan.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Position

Prior Art and Novelty

The patent landscape around pharmaceutical manufacturing in Japan is extensive, with both domestic and international patents covering various synthesis methods, intermediates, and formulations. A thorough prior art search reveals:

  • Existing Japanese and international patents on similar processes, such as those related to high-purity synthesis of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), continuous manufacturing methods, and environmentally friendly processes.
  • Global process patents from major pharmaceutical companies, which focus on improving yields or reducing costs.

The novelty of JP2019527703 hinges on:

  • A new combination of reagents, process parameters, or steps.
  • Specific intermediate compounds not previously patented.
  • Achieving a particular purity or bioavailability profile via the process.

Patent Family and Related Applications

The patent likely exists within a family, with equivalents filed in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and China, reflecting strategic planning to prevent infringing on generic entrants globally. Patent applications in major jurisdictions may include:

  • Broader claims covering similar processes or compounds.
  • Different claim scopes tailored to regional patent standards.

Patent Strength and Enforceability

The enforceability of JP2019527703 depends on:

  • Claim Breadth: If the claims are narrowly drafted around specific parameters, they may be easier to design around but offer less protection.
  • Prior Art: The existence of similar processes could threaten novelty or inventive step.
  • Non-Obviousness: The process must provide unexpected advantages over existing methods, as per Japanese patent law standards.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators: The patent potentially blocks competitors from employing similar manufacturing processes, particularly if the claims are broad.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Must evaluate claim scope and prior art to determine freedom-to-operate.
  • Licensing and Collaboration Opportunities: The patent holder could license the process to other firms, leveraging Japan's significant pharmaceutical manufacturing ecosystem.

Conclusion

JP2019527703 likely covers a valuable manufacturing process with tailored claims focused on innovative steps that improve production efficiency or product purity. Its scope appears strategically crafted to provide enforceable, yet sufficient, protection within Japan’s highly competitive pharmaceutical landscape.

Understanding the patent's claims and landscape enables stakeholders to assess its strength, potential for licensing, and avenues for design-around strategies. Continuous monitoring of related patents and applications will be critical for maintaining a competitive edge in Japanese pharmaceutical patent management.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's broad process claims protect a specific manufacturing method, potentially affecting competitors' process options in Japan.
  • Its strength depends on claim specificities and prior art landscape; broad, innovative claims hold strategic value.
  • Positioning within a patent family indicates regional protection efforts, requiring compliance with jurisdiction-specific standards.
  • Stakeholders must conduct freedom-to-operate analyses considering related patents and pending applications.
  • Ongoing patent prosecution and possible litigations could influence the patent's enforceability and commercial value.

FAQs

1. How does JP2019527703 compare to similar patents in global markets?
It may be narrower or broader depending on regional patent laws and existing art, requiring careful comparison with international patents to understand global enforceability.

2. Can this patent be challenged for invalidity?
Yes. Opponents can analyze prior art to contest novelty or inventive step, particularly if prior processes are similar.

3. What strategic value does this patent provide to a pharmaceutical company?
It grants process exclusivity in Japan, providing a competitive edge in manufacturing and potential licensing revenue.

4. How can competitors avoid infringing this patent?
By designing alternative synthesis routes, changing process parameters, or using different intermediates, while ensuring compliance with Japanese patent law.

5. Is the patent likely to be maintained long-term?
Yes, provided maintenance fees are paid and it remains valid against challenges, especially if its claims are upheld as novel and inventive.


Sources:
[1] Japan Patent Office official publication JP2019527703, available on J-PlatPat platform.
[2] Patent landscape reports and global pharmaceutical patent databases.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.