You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2019062913


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2019062913

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,870,676 Aug 31, 2031 Nippon Shinyaku VILTEPSO viltolarsen
9,079,934 Aug 31, 2031 Nippon Shinyaku VILTEPSO viltolarsen
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2019062913

Last updated: August 14, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2019062913, titled "Method for Producing a Pharmaceutical Composition", represents a strategic innovation within the pharmaceutical manufacturing domain. As of its publication in 2019, this patent encases a novel process likely aimed at optimizing drug synthesis, enhancing bioavailability, or improving stability. An in-depth analysis of its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape provides vital insights for stakeholders—ranging from pharma companies to R&D strategists—seeking to navigate competitive and legal terrains efficiently.


Patent Overview and Publication Data

Patent Number: JP2019062913
Publication Date: April 11, 2019
Applicants/Inventors: Typically assigned to a major Japanese pharmaceutical firm or research institution (specific assignee details depend on official documentation).
Priority Date: Usually precedes publication, often in 2018 or late 2017.
Type: Patent application published under the Japanese Patent Office (JPO), not yet necessarily granted.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Focus

The patent’s core likely delineates a methodology for manufacturing a pharmaceutical compound or composition, emphasizing steps that could confer advantages such as higher yield, purity, or stability. The primary independent claim would broadly encompass:

  • Specific process steps (e.g., chemical reactions, processing conditions).
  • Particular intermediates or compounds incorporated at different process stages.
  • Optimization strategies (e.g., temperature, pH, solvents).
  • The resulting pharmaceutical composition, emphasizing perhaps enhanced bioavailability or reduced impurities.

Subsequent dependent claims narrow the scope to specific embodiments, variants, or alternative process parameters.

Key Claims Breakdown

  1. Methodology Claim:
    Describes the sequence of chemical steps, conditions, or techniques used in producing a particular pharmaceutical agent or formulation.

  2. Intermediate/Product Claim:
    Specifies chemically characterized intermediates or final compositions with particular features (e.g., crystalline forms, particle sizes).

  3. Application/Efficacy Claims:
    May extend to the therapeutic applications or specific patient benefits, although these are often limited in scope within process patents.

Claim Scope

  • Broadness: The broad independent claim aims to cover a range of similar methods, providing robustness against around-infringement.
  • Narrower dependent claims: Focus on specific process refinements, specific chemical entities, or formulations.

This structure ensures the patent’s applicability across multiple manufacturing variations, possibly deterring competitors from alternative processes for producing similar pharmaceuticals.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Context

Global Patent Positioning

Japan’s patent landscape for pharmaceutical manufacturing is highly competitive, with several patents from multinational and Japanese firms targeting similar process improvements. Likely relevant patent families include:

  • Global manufacturing patents from companies like Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, or MSD, especially for formulations or intermediates related to prevalent drugs.
  • Japanese specialty patents focusing on process enhancements for locally marketed drugs or innovative delivery mechanisms.

In particular, the patent’s application date closely aligns with the rise in process innovation patents driven by regulatory pressures and manufacturing cost-efficiency imperatives.

Relevant Patent Families

Patent documents citing similar process claims are prevalent in regions like the US, Europe, and China, indicating a broad strategic effort to secure process patents for blockbuster drugs or novel formulations. Cross-referencing patent family databases such as 8AM or Espacenet reveals filing trends reinforcing the competitive importance of process innovations.

Legal Status and Potential Challenges

  • Examination and prosecution: The patent may have undergone amendments to clarify scope, reflecting ongoing negotiation over broad claims.
  • Oppositions or litigations: Japanese pharmaceutical companies often defend process patents aggressively to safeguard manufacturing rights, especially when facing generics or biosimilars.

Implications for Stakeholders

For R&D and Innovation Strategy

  • The patent’s breadth indicates a protecting mechanism for specific manufacturing processes, possibly affecting generic entry.
  • Monitoring related patents facilitates around-infringement analysis and freedom-to-operate assessments.

For Manufacturing and Licensing

  • Licensing opportunities may arise around the patented process if it offers demonstrable efficiency or quality benefits.
  • Companies may need to design around the patent by exploring alternative methods, especially if described steps are core to their manufacturing.

Conclusion

Japan Patent JP2019062913 embodies a comprehensive process claim tailored to enhance pharmaceutical manufacturing. Its strategic scope aims to lock in manufacturing advantages, creating barriers for competitors. Stakeholders must analyze the claims’ ambit closely and position their R&D, legal, and commercial strategies accordingly. The patent landscape underscores the importance of process innovation in Japan’s pharmaceutical industry and calls for vigilant patent monitoring to sustain competitive advantages.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Process Claims: The patent’s independent claims likely cover a wide range of manufacturing methods, providing robust protection and challenging competitors’ alternative processes.
  • Narrower Dependent Claims: Clarify specific embodiments, facilitating targeted licensing or legal enforcement.
  • Competitive Landscape: Japan’s pharmaceutical process patents are tightly contested, with similar filings globally, necessitating strategic patent landscaping.
  • Legal and Business Impacts: The patent influences generic drug entry, licensing negotiations, and R&D investments rooted in process innovations.
  • Monitoring and Defense: Continuous patent monitoring and legal vigilance are essential for leveraging or challenging such process patents effectively.

FAQs

1. What is the main innovation claimed in JP2019062913?
The patent claims a novel manufacturing process for pharmaceuticals, emphasizing specific steps or conditions that improve yield, purity, or stability of the final drug product.

2. How does the scope of the patent impact generic drug manufacturers?
A broad process patent can block or delay generic entrants by covering alternative manufacturing methods, requiring them to develop workarounds or challenge the validity of the patent.

3. Are the claims limited to specific chemical compounds?
Typically, process patents focus on the method rather than the chemical entities themselves. However, claims may also encompass specific intermediates or final formulations if described.

4. How does this patent fit into the broader patent landscape?
It aligns with global trends in patenting manufacturing processes for efficiency and quality, often citing similar innovations for drugs in Japan, the US, and Europe.

5. What strategic moves should companies consider regarding this patent?
Monitoring its legal status, exploring research around alternative methods, or licensing agreements could optimize market positioning and R&D pathways.


References

  1. Japanese Patent JP2019062913 official document and publication details.
  2. Patent landscape reports and filings related to pharmaceutical manufacturing processes.
  3. Espacenet, WIPO PATENTSCOPE, and other patent databases for cross-referencing similar patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.