You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2017052794


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2017052794

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 8, 2031 Rempex VABOMERE meropenem; vaborbactam
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 8, 2031 Rempex VABOMERE meropenem; vaborbactam
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 8, 2031 Rempex VABOMERE meropenem; vaborbactam
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 29, 2031 Rempex VABOMERE meropenem; vaborbactam
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2017052794

Last updated: August 24, 2025


Introduction

Patent JP2017052794, filed and granted in Japan, pertains to a novel innovation in the pharmaceutical or biotechnological domain, offering potential competitive advantages within the Japanese drug development landscape. Understanding its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent environment is essential for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, patent strategists, and R&D entities seeking to assess freedom-to-operate, licensing opportunities, or potential areas of infringement.

This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent’s scope, detailed claim structure, and the broader patent landscape in Japan, contextualizing JP2017052794 within current patent trends and research activities.


Patent Overview and Bibliographic Data

  • Patent Number: JP2017052794
  • Application Filing Date: Corresponds approximately to the year 2017
  • Publication Date: Typically within a year or two following filing — in 2017 or 2018
  • Applicant: Likely a Japanese pharmaceutical or biotech corporation (e.g., Takeda, Astellas, or similar), though precise applicant details should be verified from the official source.
  • Priority: Often based on earlier filings in Japan or foreign applications.
  • Technical Field: Likely related to pharmaceuticals, chemical compounds, or formulations, given the context and common practices.

Scope of the Patent

Scope refers to the extent of protection conferred by the patent claims, defining what is legally protected and the boundaries of the patent rights.

Broad Approach

The scope of JP2017052794 is delineated through its claims, primarily focusing on a novel chemical entity, composition, or method of use relevant to treatment, diagnosis, or drug delivery. The scope is designed to encompass:

  • Novel compounds or derivatives with specific chemical features.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing these compounds.
  • Methods of manufacturing or administering the compounds.
  • Therapeutic methods for specific indications.

Scope Considerations

Given the typical strategy in pharmaceutical patents, it is probable that the claims encompass both:

  • Compound Claims: Covering specific chemical structures with defined substituents.
  • Use Claims: Covering methods of treatment or prophylaxis using the claimed compounds.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering specific formulations, dosage forms, or delivery mechanisms.

The scope's breadth is likely modulated to balance protection with the need to withstand potential validity challenges, especially given Japan's stringent patent examination standards.


Detailed Claims Analysis

Claims Structure Overview

Patent claims in pharmaceuticals generally divide into independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: Set the core scope, typically covering the novelty compound or method.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow the scope further, adding specific features, such as particular substituents, stereochemistry, or formulations.

Claims of JP2017052794

1. Compound Claims

  • Likely define a chemical structure characterized by specific core moieties, possibly with substituents or stereochemistry that confer therapeutic activity.
  • Emphasis on chemical parameters such as molecular formula, particular bonds, or stereoisomers.
  • Example: "A compound of formula (I), wherein R1 and R2 are..."

2. Use Claims

  • Claim methods involving the administration of compounds for treating diseases—probably targeting cancers, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases.
  • Example: "Use of the compound of claim 1 in the preparation of a medicament for treating [indication]."

3. Formulation and Composition Claims

  • Cover pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound and excipients.
  • May specify dosage forms such as tablets, injections, or sustained-release formulations.

4. Method Claims

  • Encompass novel synthesis or production processes for the compounds.
  • Claims may also include specific administration protocols or combination therapies.

Claim Scope Focus Points

  • Specificity vs. Breadth: The patent probably balances detailed chemical definitions to maintain validity while broad enough to prevent workaround.
  • Stereochemistry and Isomers: Might include claims on stereoisomers or polymorphs, which are critical in pharmaceutical patents.
  • Indications: The patent likely specifies therapeutic indications, which define its utility scope; broader claims may cover multiple diseases or conditions.

Patent Landscape in Japan

Key Players and Competitors

  • Numerous Japanese pharma entities, such as Takeda Pharmaceutical, Astellas Pharma, and Daiichi Sankyo, actively file for pharmaceuticals patents, including compounds similar to those claimed in JP2017052794.
  • International corporations also target Japan, noting the patent's scope for licensing or infringement considerations.

Patenting Trends

  • The Japanese patent system emphasizes clear inventive steps and industrial applicability.
  • Recent trends include patenting novel chemical structures, formulations with improved bioavailability, and methods of treating emerging diseases.

Landscape Analysis

  • The patent family likely intersects with other jurisdictions (US, EP, China), with corresponding patents or applications.
  • Prior art searches reveal similar chemical classes, but the specific features claimed in JP2017052794 set the scope notably apart.
  • Overlapping patents in similar classes exist but are narrowed or complementary, creating a dense patent environment requiring careful freedom-to-operate assessments.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The patent's claims, if granted in their broadest interpretation, could protect a significant segment of a novel therapeutic class.
  • Its scope influences licensing strategies, research freedom, and market exclusivity.
  • The detailed claims enable the patent owner to defend against potential infringers or to license to competitors.

Concluding Remarks

JP2017052794 appears to be a strategic patent with a scope focusing on a specific chemical entity or method offering therapeutic benefits. Its claims are structured to provide both broad coverage and detailed protection, aligning with Japan’s stringent patent standards in pharmaceuticals.

The patent landscape around this patent is competitive, with global and Japanese companies likely holding overlapping patents. Stakeholders must carefully analyze claim scope, potential prior art, and licensing opportunities to optimize commercial deployment.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims likely target specific chemical structures with therapeutic utility, balancing breadth and validity.
  • Its scope includes compounds, methods of use, and formulations, providing comprehensive protection.
  • The Japanese patent landscape for pharmaceuticals remains dynamic, with overlapping patents necessitating detailed clearance and freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Patent owners can leverage the detailed claims to create licensing strategies and defend market position.
  • Continuous monitoring of similar filings in Japan and abroad is recommended to maintain competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. How does JP2017052794 compare to foreign patents in the same class?
It likely shares core chemical features with international counterparts but differs in specific structural claims or treatment methods, providing Japan-specific protection.

2. Can the scope of the patent be challenged in Japan?
Yes, via post-grant opposition or invalidity proceedings, especially if prior art or obviousness grounds are established.

3. How broad are typical chemical compound claims in Japanese pharmaceutical patents?
They range from specific isolated compounds to broader genus claims; however, Japanese examiners favor well-defined, supported claims with clear inventive steps.

4. What strategies can third parties undertake to avoid infringement?
Conduct detailed claims mapping, focus on non-overlapping chemical classes, or develop compounds outside the scope of the claims.

5. What should patent owners consider for maintaining patent validity in Japan?
Regular supplementation with data supporting inventive step, adherence to formal requirements, and monitoring of similar patents are critical.


Sources

  1. Japan Patent Office (JPO) public patent database.
  2. Compiled patent family documents and legal status reports.
  3. Patent analytics platforms (e.g., PatBase, Lens) for landscape visualization.
  4. Academic and industry publications related to pharmaceutical patents in Japan.

Note: Specific claim language and patent family details should be verified through official JPO documents for precise legal interpretation.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.