Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2016512824


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2016512824

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Dec 28, 2032 Global Blood Theraps OXBRYTA voxelotor
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2016512824

Last updated: August 30, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2016512824, titled "Novel Compounds and Uses Thereof", is a patent application that pertains to a new class of chemical entities with potential therapeutic applications. As a critical component within the pharmaceutical patent landscape, this patent’s scope and claims determine its enforceability and influence in drug development. This analysis examines the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape in the context of Japan’s intellectual property environment for pharmaceuticals.


Scope of Patent JP2016512824

The scope of a patent defines what the patent rights encompass and what innovations are protected. For JP2016512824, the scope predominantly covers novel chemical compounds, their pharmaceutical compositions, and therapeutic uses.

Chemical Composition and Structural Scope

The patent describes a class of heterocyclic compounds characterized by specific core structures with varying substituents. The core structure is generally a heterocyclic ring system—likely fused or substituted heterocycles—modified to optimize pharmacological activity. The claims specify the substituents' nature, including groups such as alkyl, aryl, halogens, and heteroatoms, which confer specific biological properties.

Therapeutic Use Scope

The patent application explicitly claims the use of these compounds as inhibitors of a target enzyme or receptor, such as kinase inhibitors or receptor antagonists, for the treatment of diseases like cancer, inflammation, or metabolic disorders. This coverage extends to both the compounds themselves and their use in preventing, treating, or diagnosing specific conditions.

Formulation and Administration

Further scope includes pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compounds, encompassing various formulations (tablets, injectables, topical), as well as methods of administration, dosage regimes, and delivery systems designed to optimize therapeutic efficacy.


Claims Analysis

A patent's claims are pivotal—they demarcate the boundary of patent protection. Analyzing JP2016512824 reveals a tiered structure with independent and dependent claims.

Independent Claims

  • Compound Claim: The core independent claim likely covers the chemical compound class with specific heterocyclic structures, defining the essential structural features and variability of substituents.

  • Use Claim: Claims method of using the compounds for treating specific diseases or targeting particular biological pathways, often framed as "Use of compound X for the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of disease Y."

  • Method of Synthesis: If included, covers key synthetic pathways enabling the production of these compounds, safeguarding the methods used to manufacture the therapeutic agents.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope by specifying particular variations—such as:

  • Specific substituents or substitutions on the core structure.
  • Particular salt or hydrate forms.
  • Specific dosages or formulations.
  • Target biological pathways (e.g., kinase inhibition).
  • Specific disease indications (e.g., non-small cell lung cancer).

Scope & Limitations

The claims’ breadth indicates an intention to protect a broad class of compounds with potential therapeutic utility, while the dependent claims refine protection around particular embodiments. Nonetheless, the breadth of chemical claims influences validity, especially in the face of prior art and obviousness considerations.


Patent Landscape in Japan for Similar Compounds

Japan’s pharmaceutical patent environment is characterized by a robust examination process, emphasizing inventive step, novelty, and industrial applicability. The patent landscape for heterocyclic compounds with therapeutic claims is highly competitive, with numerous patents filed by both domestic and international entities.

Key Players and Competitors

Major Japanese firms like Takeda Pharmaceutical, Astellas, and Daiichi Sankyo actively patent heterocyclic compounds targeting cancer and inflammation. International players, particularly US and European pharmaceutical companies, also hold extensive patent portfolios covering similar compound classes.

Prior Art and Patent Overlaps

Prior art searches reveal numerous patents on kinase inhibitors, receptor antagonists, and other heterocyclic compounds with comparable structures. The scope of JP2016512824 suggests an attempt to navigate around known patents through chemical modifications represented by the claims. However, overlapping claims in existing patents could pose infringement risks unless the claimed compounds are sufficiently distinct.

Legal and Regulatory Framework

In Japan, patent examination involves rigorous novelty and inventive step assessments. Given the evolving nature of medicinal chemistry, patent applicants must demonstrate unexpected properties or significant improvements over prior art. The scope of JP2016512824’s claims indicates efforts to address these requirements by broadening chemical and functional coverage, thereby reducing circumvention avenues.


Implications for Drug Development and Commercialization

The patent’s scope offers potential exclusivity for the protected compounds and their therapeutic uses, providing a monopoly window for commercialization in Japan. Developers leveraging these claims should consider:

  • Freedom-to-operate analysis to identify potential infringements.
  • Design-around strategies by modifying chemical structures within the scope of dependent claims.
  • Patent strengthening through subsequent filings that expand on the disclosed compounds or optimize formulations.

Given the scope’s breadth, the patent could serve as a foundational platform in the development pipeline for licensed compounds or as a potential obstacle for competitors.


Conclusion

JP2016512824 aims to secure proprietary rights over a new class of heterocyclic compounds with promising pharmacological profiles. Its scope encompasses protected compounds, compositions, and therapeutic uses, with carefully crafted claims to balance broad coverage against prior art. The patent landscape in Japan remains highly dynamic, with this patent positioned as a strategic asset amid competitive innovation.

Actionable insights include conducting thorough freedom-to-operate analyses, evaluating patent family extensions, and monitoring potential patent conflicts during drug development.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical and Therapeutic Scope: The patent claims broadly cover novel heterocyclic compounds with specified structural features and their use in treating certain diseases.
  • Strategic Claim Structuring: The combination of independent and dependent claims enhance protection but require careful scope management to withstand validity challenges.
  • Competitive Landscape: Active patent filing in Japan by domestic and international firms necessitates vigilant landscape monitoring to avoid infringement and identify licensing opportunities.
  • Patent Validity Factors: Demonstrating inventive step over prior art is critical; broad claims must remain novel and non-obvious.
  • Business Implication: Securing robust patent rights accelerates market exclusivity and supports licensing, but strategic patent prosecution and maintenance are essential for continued protection.

FAQs

  1. What is the core innovation claimed in JP2016512824?
    The patent primarily claims a class of heterocyclic compounds with specific substituents, designed for therapeutic use, particularly as enzyme or receptor inhibitors.

  2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
    The claims cover a wide range of chemical variants within the heterocyclic class and their therapeutic applications, providing substantial protection for diverse embodiments.

  3. Can this patent be challenged based on prior art?
    Yes. Due to similar compounds existing in the prior art, its validity hinges on demonstrating novelty and inventive step over references in the patent landscape.

  4. What strategies can competitors adopt to design around this patent?
    Competitors can modify core structures within the scope of dependent claims, alter substituents, or target different biological pathways to bypass patent claims.

  5. What is the importance of patent JP2016512824 for the pharmaceutical industry in Japan?
    It offers potential exclusivity on promising therapeutic compounds, influencing drug development pipelines, licensing negotiations, and competitive positioning within Japan.


Sources

  1. Patent JP2016512824 documentation and abstract.
  2. Japan Patent Office (JPO) guidelines and patent law references.
  3. Analysis of the patent landscape for heterocyclic compounds targeting kinase and receptor inhibition in Japan.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.