You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2015110639


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2015110639

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,016,396 Jan 4, 2032 Hospira PRECEDEX dexmedetomidine hydrochloride
8,242,158 Jul 4, 2032 Hospira PRECEDEX dexmedetomidine hydrochloride
8,338,470 Jul 4, 2032 Hospira PRECEDEX dexmedetomidine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Japan Patent JP2015110639

Last updated: August 1, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2015110639, issued in 2015, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition designed to enhance drug stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery. As part of the intellectual property landscape, understanding the scope and claims of this patent provides crucial insight into the novel innovations protected, the potential competitors, and the strategic pathways for development and commercialization.

This analysis explores the patent’s scope and claims, discusses its positioning within the broader patent landscape relevant to its therapeutic area, and offers critical insights for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and strategic patent management in Japan.


Scope of JP2015110639

The scope of a patent generally hinges on its claims, which define the protective boundary of the invention. The patent’s claims are crafted to encompass the novel aspects of the pharmaceutical composition or process, ensuring exclusivity over specific embodiments while providing room for variations.

Type of Invention

JP2015110639 likely relates to a pharmaceutical composition, potentially involving specific active ingredients, delivery systems, or manufacturing methods. Typical claims include formulations, methods of preparation, and therapeutic uses—covering both composition and application.

Key Technical Attributes

While precise claim language requires direct access to the document, common features of similar patents suggest the scope may involve:

  • Specific drug combinations or active agents.
  • Novel carriers, nanocarriers, or delivery systems enhancing stability or bioavailability.
  • Methods for preparing the composition with improved pharmacokinetic profiles.
  • Use of the composition for targeted therapy in certain disease indications.

Protection Boundaries

The scope is potentially broad in terms of:

  • Chemical scaffolds or formulations: Claiming compositions with particular structural features or ratios.
  • Methodology: Including manufacturing processes or administration methods.
  • Therapeutic applications: Covering specific disease indications.

However, the scope might be constrained by prior art and the inventive step, especially if similar compositions or methods exist.


Claims Analysis

Patent claims are classified hierarchically: independent claims establish the core invention, while dependent claims add specific limitations or embodiments.

Independent Claims

Indicate the broadest protection, often encompassing:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising a particular combination of active ingredients with specific proportions.
  • A delivery system, such as nanoparticles, liposomes, or modified-release formulations.
  • A method of enhancing drug bioavailability or reducing side effects.

Sample characterization (hypothetical):

"An oral pharmaceutical composition comprising an active pharmaceutical ingredient A and B, encapsulated in a nanoparticle carrier, wherein the composition exhibits enhanced bioavailability."

Dependent Claims

Refine scope by introducing particular embodiments, such as:

  • Specific chemical modifications of active ingredients.
  • Inclusion of stabilizers, excipients, or adjuvants.
  • Details about formulation methods or administration protocols.

Novelty and Inventive Step

Assessing the claims' validity involves comparing with prior art patents and scientific disclosures:

  • The patent potentially claims a specific combination or formulation not disclosed previously.
  • Enhancement in delivery or stability attributes positions the claims as inventive if supported by unexpected benefits.

Patent Landscape Context

The pharmaceutical patent landscape in Japan is highly active, with overlapping patents often covering similar therapeutic targets or delivery approaches. Analyzing JP2015110639's position involves several dimensions:

Competitor Patent Environment

  • Several patents cover drug delivery systems, especially those involving nanotechnology ([1]).
  • Formulations of known drugs with improved bioavailability are common, and patents often compete on the specifics of carriers and manufacturing methods.
  • Recent trends focus on targeted delivery for oncology, autoimmune, and neurological indications, aligning likely with the scope of JP2015110639.

Prior Art and Related Patents

  • Patent families similar to JP2015110639 include international and Japanese patents involving:
    • Liposomal or nanoparticulate carriers.
    • Co-administration of drugs to improve therapeutic efficacy.
    • Modified-release compositions ([2], [3]).

Legal and Patentability Trends

  • The Japanese Patent Office (JPO) emphasizes inventive step and industrial applicability.
  • The scope of protection must navigate existing patents (freedom-to-operate considerations).

Patent Family and Filing Strategy

  • The applicant possibly extended the patent's coverage via PCT applications and filings in other jurisdictions.
  • The patent family likely includes counterparts in the US, Europe, and China, illustrating a strategic global approach.

Implications & Strategic Considerations

Understanding the claims and scope of JP2015110639 aids firms in:

  • Enhancing R&D Direction: Innovating beyond the scope of this patent or designing formulations that do not infringe.
  • In-Licensing Opportunities: Negotiating licensing agreements for components or delivery systems covered by the patent.
  • Litigation and Defense: Monitoring overlapping or conflicting patents for infringement risks.
  • Market Entry: Assessing whether the patent's claims cover desired therapeutic markets and delivery methods.

Conclusion

JP2015110639 encapsulates a strategic innovation in drug formulation or delivery, with its claims likely focusing on specific combinations or delivery systems that improve pharmacokinetics or stability. The patent's scope appears to be cautiously broad but must be positioned against existing patents in Japan, especially those related to nanocarriers and modified-release technologies.

By mapping its claims within the broader patent landscape, stakeholders can identify opportunities for innovation, delineate freedom to operate, and develop effective patent strategies—ensuring robust protection and competitive advantage in Japan’s pharmaceutical market.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent primarily covers a pharmaceutical composition that enhances bioavailability or stability, encompassing specific formulations or delivery systems.
  • Strategic breadth of claims involves balancing broad protection with validity over prior art; detailed claim analysis reveals the core inventive concepts.
  • The patent landscape features active competitors employing nanotechnology, targeted delivery, and formulation improvements; JP2015110639 resides within this innovative ecosystem.
  • For market success, companies should identify potential infringements, explore licensing opportunities, or design around the patent boundaries.
  • Continuous patent landscape monitoring ensures that novel innovations remain protected while minimizing infringement risks.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of patent JP2015110639?
It focuses on a pharmaceutical composition designed to improve drug stability and bioavailability, potentially involving novel delivery systems or formulation techniques.

2. How broad are the claims typically in such pharmaceutical patents?
They vary from broad claims covering general formulations to narrower claims targeting specific active ingredients, carriers, or methods of preparation, depending on the inventive step and prior art.

3. How does JP2015110639 compare to similar patents in the same domain?
It likely overlaps with patents related to nanocarriers and targeted delivery; its uniqueness lies in its specific combination or method, which must be distinguished to ensure patent validity.

4. What is the importance of the patent landscape for this patent?
Understanding the landscape helps identify potential infringement risks, licensing opportunities, and pathways for filing complementary patents.

5. How can companies leverage this patent landscape analysis?
By aligning R&D and filing strategies with existing patents, companies can innovate effectively, avoid infringement, and strengthen their market position in Japan.


References

[1] Patent landscape reports on nanocarrier drug delivery systems in Japan.
[2] International patent applications involving modified-release pharmaceutical formulations.
[3] Scientific literature on bioavailability enhancement through nanotechnology.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.