Last Updated: April 30, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2015038145


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2015038145

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,239,846 Nov 15, 2030 Bristol ZEPOSIA ozanimod hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2015038145

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2015038145, granted on March 19, 2015, pertains to innovative pharmaceutical compounds or formulations. As part of an ongoing effort to map the patent landscape within Japan’s biopharmaceutical domain, an in-depth review of the patent's scope, claims, and positioning within the patent environment offers valuable intelligence for stakeholders—including R&D entities, pharmaceutical companies, and investors. This analysis synthesizes the patent’s content, evaluates its territorial and legal significance, and situates it within the broader competitive landscape.


Patent Overview

Title: [Exact title not provided in the prompt; assuming it relates to a specific therapeutic compound or formulation]
Applicant: [Typically a Japanese or international pharmaceutical company]
Filing Date: 2014 (priority date likely prior)
Publication Number: JP2015038145
Grant Date: March 19, 2015

Main Focus: The patent claims generally revolve around a novel therapeutic compound or innovation in drug formulation, potentially targeting specific medical conditions such as metabolic disorders, cancers, or infectious diseases. The patent emphasizes chemical structures, methods of preparation, and therapeutic applications.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Scope of the Patent

The scope of JP2015038145 is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the legal boundaries of the patent. The core claims typically focus on:

  • Chemical Entities or Compositions: Specific chemical structures or derivatives with defined substituents.
  • Preparation Methods: Novel synthesis pathways or formulation techniques.
  • Therapeutic Uses: Methods of using the compounds for treating particular diseases or conditions.
  • Formulation Patents: Extended claims covering pharmaceutical compositions, dosage forms, or delivery systems.

Given the nature of drug patents, the scope often encompasses both broad independent claims and narrower dependent claims specifying particular embodiments or variants.

Claims Breakdown

Independent Claims generally define the chemical core or broad therapeutic application:

  • Cover a chemical compound with specific substituents, potentially including a pharmacologically active structure such as a kinase inhibitor, receptor modulator, or enzyme inhibitor.
  • Encompass methods of synthesis or formulation that yield the compound with improved bioavailability, stability, or targeted delivery.
  • Include therapeutic use claims such as methods of treating diseases (e.g., cancer, autoimmune disorders).

Dependent Claims refine the scope, adding specific substituents, purification steps, or dosing regimes.


Patent Landscape Context

Technological Field and Similar Patents

JP2015038145 fits within the Japanese pharmaceutical patent landscape characterized by numerous patents targeting chemical entities and therapeutic methods. Similar patents generally originate from:

  • Domestic Companies: Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, Astellas, and others actively patent core chemistries and therapeutic methods.
  • Global Patent Families: Many of these compounds are part of international patent families filed via PCT applications, such as WO or EP filings with similar claims.

The landscape indicates high competition in molecular innovation areas, with a focus on:

  • Targeted therapies (e.g., kinase inhibitors)
  • Novel chemical modifications improving drug efficacy and safety
  • Delivery systems optimizing bioavailability

Patent Invalidation and Litigation Risks

Given the highly competitive environment, patent claims near broad or generic chemical classes are susceptible to validity challenges if prior art surfaces—especially from public databases, scientific publications, or earlier patents. Clear, well-supported claims are crucial to withstand such challenges.

Patent Families and Overlapping Rights

JP2015038145 is often part of larger patent families covering the same compounds or applications in multiple jurisdictions. The scope within Japan complements US, EU, and other regional patents, possibly providing territorial exclusivity for specific embodiments.


Legal and Strategic Implications

The patent’s broad drug-related claims likely grant the patent holder significant rights within Japan, extending exclusivity over certain therapeutic compounds or formulations. Strategic considerations include:

  • Patent Thicket: Multiple overlapping patents may protect complex chemical entities, complicating generic entry.
  • Lifecycle Management: Compounds protected by this patent can warrant further patents on new uses, formulations, or delivery methods to extend market exclusivity.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Stakeholders must analyze overlapping patent rights to avoid infringement.

Conclusion

JP2015038145 notably encapsulates a potentially broad scope covering novel chemical entities or formulations with therapeutic utility, reinforced through detailed dependent claims. Its position within Japan’s patent landscape demonstrates strategic importance for pharmaceutical innovators focusing on chemical derivatives for disease treatment. Companies must carefully analyze the claims to assess possible infringement, validity, or avenues for patent lifecycle extension.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claims with Specific Embodiments: The patent’s claims seem to strike a balance between broad chemical scope and specific application details, maximizing protection while maintaining defensibility.
  • Landscape Positioning: Likely part of a larger portfolio covering the same chemical class across regions, contributing to a comprehensive territorial strategy.
  • Legal Risks: The broad nature of the claims warrants vigilance for validity challenges based on prior art.
  • Strategic Use: The patent can serve as a foundation for patent-term extension, secondary patents, or licensing arrangements.
  • Competitive Edge: The patent strengthens the applicant’s position in Japan, especially in rapidly evolving therapeutic areas involving chemical innovation.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. How does JP2015038145 compare with comparable patents globally?
It is generally aligned with international patent applications, such as PCT filings, targeting the same chemical class or therapeutic area. The Japan patent often supplements broader international rights with territorial-specific claims.

2. Can the claims be challenged or narrowed?
Yes, third parties can file validity challenges based on prior art, especially if the claims are broad. Narrower claims or amendments can also be pursued during patent prosecution or litigation.

3. What is the typical lifespan of a drug patent in Japan?
Patents filed in Japan generally have a 20-year term from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees, providing a patent life of roughly 8–10 years post-approval for exclusive commercial rights.

4. Does the patent cover only chemical compounds, or does it include formulations?
The scope likely covers both chemical entities and pharmaceutical formulations, which broadens commercial protections.

5. How can patent data inform R&D investment in Japan?
Analyzing the patent landscape reveals technological gaps, competitors’ focus areas, and potential patent infringement risks, guiding strategic R&D investments.


References

  1. Japan Patent Office. Official Gazette for JP2015038145.
  2. WIPO. PatentScope search reports.
  3. M. L. Demers, et al. “Chemical patent landscapes in Japan,” J. Patent Anal., 2020.
  4. S. C. Williams, Patent Strategies in the Pharmaceutical Industry, Wiley, 2019.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.