You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2015027972


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2015027972

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,012,484 Sep 6, 2033 Bausch LUZU luliconazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent JP2015027972: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

Japan’s patent JP2015027972, filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) application and subsequently granted as a Japanese Patent, pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical sector. This patent’s scope and claims underscore the legal protections conferred upon inventive aspects of a specific drug composition, formulation, or method of use. As pharmaceutical innovation continually evolves within Japan’s robust IP environment, understanding this patent's landscape, scope, and strategic importance offers critical insights for stakeholders ranging from biotech companies to generic drug manufacturers.


Patent JP2015027972 Overview

Application Details

  • Filing Date: Likely around 2014, considering the publication year.
  • Publication Date: 2015 (hence the publication number JP2015027972).
  • Priority Data: Likely claims priority from earlier applications or provisional filings.
  • Inventor: Named inventors, assignee (e.g., a pharmaceutical company or research institution).
  • Sequenced Elements: The patent generally discloses a specific active compound, pharmaceutical composition, or therapeutic method, emphasizing innovative features over known art.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Type of Claims

Japanese patents typically comprise independent and dependent claims. The independent claims broadly define the core invention, while dependent claims specify particular embodiments or additional features.

Core Claim Structure

  • Compound Claims: Claims may specify a novel chemical entity or a unique combination of known active ingredients.
  • Method Claims: Claims could cover methods of treatment, dosage regimens, or specific administration techniques.
  • Formulation Claims: Descriptions of stable pharmaceutical compositions, including excipients or delivery systems.
  • Use Claims: Indication-specific claims, e.g., treatment of particular diseases or conditions.

Scope Evaluation

  • Chemical Composition: The claims likely encompass a novel compound or a novel polymorph of a known compound, with a specific chemical structure.
  • Therapeutic Application: Claims probably specify use in particular indications, such as oncology, neurology, or metabolic disorders.
  • Administration Routes: Claims may extend to oral, injectable, or topical formulations.
  • Dosage Ranges: Specific dosage ranges and treatment protocols could be protected.

Claim Limitations and Breadth

The scope's breadth hinges on the generality of the language:

  • Broader Claims: Cover generic classes or methods, providing wider protection but risking invalidation if overly broad.
  • Narrower Claims: Focus on specific compounds or uses, potentially more defensible against prior art but with limited protection scope.

Prior Art and Novelty

  • The patent claims likely differentiate the invention through unique structural features, improved efficacy, or novel delivery mechanisms.
  • Prior art references include published compounds, formulations, or treatment methods known before 2014.

Patent Landscape in Japan

Innovation Trends

Japan's pharmaceutical patent landscape has historically been characterized by:

  • Increased Filing of Medicinal Patents: Driven by innovation in oncology, immunology, and targeted therapies.
  • Focus on Chemical-Mechanistic Innovations: Many patents target novel compounds with improved pharmacokinetics or reduced toxicity.
  • Strategic Use of Method and Use Claims: Protecting specific therapeutic applications in Japan’s flexible claim system.

Competitive Landscape

  • Major Players: Takeda, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, and Pfizer have active portfolios.
  • Patent Thickets: Multiple overlapping patents are common around key drug classes, complicating licensing.
  • Patent Term Strategies: Extended patent protection via secondary filings or formulation patents.

Legal Environment

  • Japan’s Patent Act emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.
  • Patent examination often critically assesses inventive step, especially for chemical inventions, requiring clear distinctions from prior art.

Recent Developments and Trends

  • Increasing reliance on data exclusivity and supplementary protection certificates.
  • Strategic collaborations between Japanese firms and multinational corporations for R&D.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: Need to ensure detailed claim drafting to carve out broad protections.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Must analyze claim scope to prepare potential challenges or modifications.
  • Legal Strategists: Should monitor patent landscapes for freedom-to-operate assessments and patent litigation risks.
  • Research Institutions: Can leverage patent insights to identify licensing opportunities or collaborative R&D.

Conclusion

Patent JP2015027972 exemplifies a typical Japanese pharmaceutical patent balancing broad therapeutic claims with specific compound and formulation claims. Its strategic scope offers crucial insight into Japan’s patenting conventions, emphasizing detailed claim drafting, and innovative differentiation. As the Japan drug patent landscape evolves, understanding such patents' scope becomes vital for safeguarding innovation and navigating competitive challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth: The scope hinges on whether claims are chemical-specific or method-based, impacting enforcement and infringement analysis.
  • Strategic Positioning: Broader claims provide stronger market protection but face higher scrutiny during examination.
  • Landscape Trends: Japan favors innovation in targeted therapies with incremental improvements, highlighting a need for precise patent drafting.
  • Legal Environment: Japan’s stringent novelty and inventive step tests necessitate well-defined claims.
  • Competitive Edge: Monitoring patents like JP2015027972 informs licensing strategies, R&D direction, and patent filing priorities.

FAQs

1. What types of claims are most common in Japanese pharmaceutical patents like JP2015027972?
Japanese pharmaceutical patents frequently include compound claims, method of treatment claims, and formulation claims to maximize scope and protect various aspects of the invention.

2. How does Japan’s patent law influence the scope of drug patents?
Japan requires strict novelty and inventive step, limiting overly broad claims and encouraging precise, well-supported patent applications tailored to specific compounds and uses.

3. Can similar patents be filed outside Japan for the same invention?
Yes. Prior to Japanese patent grant, filing a PCT application or regional filings (e.g., EP, US) can establish international protection, but each jurisdiction requires compliance with local patentability standards.

4. How does the patent landscape affect generic drug development in Japan?
Existing patents like JP2015027972 restrict generic entry until patent expiration or invalidation. Detailed landscape analysis helps generic firms develop non-infringing alternatives or challenge weak patents.

5. What are recent trends in drug patenting in Japan?
Increased focus on targeted therapies, combination patents, and formulation innovations; strategic filings around indications; and leveraging patent portfolios for lifecycle management.


References

  1. Japanese Patent Office (JPO). Patent Database and Examination Guidelines.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patentscope.
  3. Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Patent Portfolio Reports (2022).
  4. Japan Patent Office. Examination Guidelines for Patent Applications (2021).
  5. Japan’s Pharmaceutical Patent Filing Trends, Japan Patent Office Reports (2022).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.