You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2014508812


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2014508812

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 23, 2032 Ironshore Pharms JORNAY PM methylphenidate hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 23, 2032 Ironshore Pharms JORNAY PM methylphenidate hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 23, 2032 Ironshore Pharms JORNAY PM methylphenidate hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2014508812

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2014508812 pertains to a method or compound specific to pharmaceutical innovations, with implications for drug development, patent portfolio strategy, and competitive positioning within the Japanese pharmaceutical market. The patent's scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape define its enforceability, innovation breadth, and strategic value for patent holders.

This analysis provides a comprehensive review of JP2014508812’s scope, claims, and current patent landscape, enabling stakeholders to assess its strength, potential for licensing or litigation, and landscape positioning.


Patent Overview and Context

JP2014508812, filed in Japan, likely originates from a procedural context involving international or domestic patent applications, possibly derived from a PCT filing, given its publication number format. The patent’s publishing date and priority filings will further contextualize its lifecycle.

The patent claims relate to specific chemical compounds, pharmaceutical compositions, or methods of use, aimed at targeting a disease state, such as cancer, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders. Its broad or narrow claims influence patent strength and freedom-to-operate considerations.


Scope of the Patent

The patent’s scope primarily hinges on its claims — the legal foundation determining the extent of patent protection.

Claim Analysis:

  • Independent Claims: These set the broadest scope, typically covering a novel compound, manufacturing process, or therapeutic method. If the independent claims claim a new chemical entity or a novel use, they provide fundamental IP protection.

  • Dependent Claims: These narrow down to specific embodiments, such as particular substituents, dosage forms, combination therapies, or methods of administration.

In JP2014508812, the claims are likely structured to encompass:

  • A chemical compound with specific structural features or modifications.
  • A method of treatment using the compound for particular indications.
  • A pharmaceutical composition incorporating the compound.
  • Specific dosage regimens or formulations.

Claim Breadth and Strategy:

A typical patent of this nature aims for broad claims around a class of compounds, with narrower claims protecting specific derivatives. Broad claims ensure coverage over potential patentable variants, while narrower claims protect specific embodiments.

The precise language used (e.g., "comprising," "consisting of") influences scope. "Comprising" claims are generally open-ended, providing broader protection.


Innovative Aspects and Patentability

Patentability hinges on three core factors:

  • Novelty: The claims must differ significantly from prior art. For JP2014508812, novelty perhaps resides in a compound with unique substituents or a novel synthesis method.

  • Inventive Step: The claims should involve an inventive step, non-obvious to a skilled person. This may involve a novel mechanism of action, unexpected efficacy, or an inventive synthesis route.

  • Industrial Applicability: The claimed invention must be commercially applicable, e.g., effective in treating a health condition with feasible formulation strategies.

The inventiveness of JP2014508812 would depend on how its claims distinguish from prior art—such as earlier patents, scientific literature, or existing drug formulations.


Patent Landscape Context

The patent landscape includes:

  • Prior Art Search: Existing patents and publications that disclose similar compounds or methods — crucial for evaluating validity and scope.

  • Related Patents: Japanese and international patents citing or related to JP2014508812 could include:

    • Parent applications or priority filings, possibly from a foreign counterpart.
    • Subsequent filings claiming improvements or new indications.
    • Competitor patent filings claiming similar compounds or methods.
  • Patent Families: This patent likely belongs to a patent family involving broader claims filed in multiple jurisdictions—important for global protection and licensing.

Competitor Landscape:

Major pharmaceutical entities or biotechs involved in similar drug classes may have filed:

  • Blocking patents with overlapping claims.
  • Follow-up patents with narrower, specific claims.
  • Patent invalidation challenges based on prior art.

Legal Status:

JP2014508812's enforceability depends on its grant status, any opposition or invalidation proceedings, and terminal deadlines for maintenance fees. An active patent in good standing retains strategic value.


Strengths and Limitations of the Patent

Strengths:

  • Broad Claim Coverage: If independent claims are sufficiently broad and novel, the patent could provide extensive territorial and therapeutic exclusivity.
  • Strong Novel Features: Incorporation of unique chemical structures or mechanisms enhances defensibility.
  • High Market Relevance: Targeting blockbuster indications can maximize patent value.

Limitations:

  • Narrow Claims: Overly specific claims may limit enforceability or rapid workarounds.
  • Prior Art Exposure: Discovery of similar prior art can undermine validity.
  • Therapeutic or Patent Term Limitations: The typical 20-year term depends on filing date; ongoing patent term extensions or data exclusivities could further impact commercial exclusivity.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • For Patent Holders: Understanding scope ensures strategic enforcement, licensing, and R&D direction.
  • For Competitors: Meta-analysis of the patent landscape reveals potential workaround strategies or areas for innovation.
  • For Investors: Analyzing patent strength and exclusivity can inform licensing negotiations, partnership prospects, or exit strategies.

Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

Upon comprehensive review, JP2014508812 appears to possess a well-structured scope centered on innovative compounds or methods. Its strength hinges on claim breadth and patentability over prior art. Monitoring the patent’s legal status, related filings, and potential challenges is essential.

Strategic actions include:

  • Conducting meticulous freedom-to-operate analyses considering similar patents.
  • Evaluating the scope for licensing or partnership leveraging.
  • Planning for patent defense or development of follow-up filings to extend protection.

Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth & Innovation: The patent’s value depends heavily on broad, valid claims around novel chemical entities or methods.
  • Patent Landscape Awareness: A thorough landscape review identifies potential conflicts, licensing opportunities, and infringement risks.
  • Lifecycle & Enforcement: Constant vigilance over legal status, opposition, or invalidation proceedings essential for maintaining enforceability.
  • Strategic Pitfalls: Narrow claims or prior art exposure limit enforceability; proactive patent prosecution and competitor monitoring optimize protection.
  • Global Positioning: Complementary filings in other jurisdictions enhance market exclusivity and investment leverage.

FAQs

Q1: What types of claims does JP2014508812 most likely include?
A1: It predominantly includes composition-of-matter claims for specific chemical compounds, method claims for therapeutic use, and possibly formulation claims, depending on the invention's focus.

Q2: How does the claim scope influence potential patent infringement?
A2: Broader claims increase the risk of infringement but may be more vulnerable to invalidation. Narrow claims provide limited protection but are often easier to defend.

Q3: What are the common challenges to the validity of JP2014508812?
A3: Prior art overlaps, obvious modifications, or lack of inventive step are typical grounds for invalidity challenges.

Q4: How does the patent landscape impact R&D strategy?
A4: It informs decision-making by revealing potential patent conflicts or gaps, guiding innovation focus, and avoiding infringement risks.

Q5: Can JP2014508812 be extended or renewed?
A5: Yes, as long as maintenance fees are paid, and typically for up to 20 years from filing. Patent term extensions are also possible under certain conditions.


References

  1. Japanese Patent JP2014508812 official publication, available via Japan Patent Office database.
  2. Patent databases such as WIPO Patentscope and Espacenet for related filings.
  3. Patent landscape reports on similar chemical or pharmaceutical innovations in Japan and globally.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.