You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2014148509


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2014148509

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,796,245 Aug 7, 2029 Tetraphase Pharms XERAVA eravacycline dihydrochloride
8,906,887 Dec 28, 2030 Tetraphase Pharms XERAVA eravacycline dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2014148509

Last updated: August 18, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2014148509, titled “Method for Producing a Cell Line”, was published on August 28, 2014. This patent application pertains to biotechnological processes aimed at generating specific cell lines, likely for pharmaceutical or regenerative medicine applications. A thorough examination of its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape provides valuable insights into its strategic positioning within the Japanese and international biotech patent ecosystems.


Scope of Patent JP2014148509

Core Focus:
JP2014148509 primarily covers a novel method for establishing cell lines, emphasizing specific culturing conditions, genetic modifications, or selection processes conducive to sustainable, high-yield, or specific-function cell lines. The patent aims to protect the procedural innovations that enable the reproducible production of particular cell types, likely with applications in drug development or therapy.

Technical Field:
Designed in the molecular biology and bioprocessing domain, this patent intersects with cell manufacturing technology, biopharmaceutical research, and regenerative medicine.

Patent Claims Overview:
The patent's claims are structured to delineate the boundaries of the invention, focusing on the steps, conditions, and genetic manipulations involved. The claims can be broadly categorized into:

  • Method Claims: Covering specific steps for producing cell lines, including culture media, environmental parameters, and genetic modification techniques.
  • Cell Line Claims: Protecting the resultant cell lines characterized by particular genetic markers, phenotypic traits, or functional attributes that are produced through the claimed methods.
  • Genetic Modification Claims: Including techniques for introducing or modifying nucleic acids within cells to achieve desired characteristics.

Analysis of Key Claims

1. Method for Cell Line Production:
The core claim likely specifies a stepwise process, emphasizing conditions such as culturing temperature, media composition, use of specific growth factors, or selection agents. For instance, claims may describe the use of a particular vector or gene editing method (e.g., CRISPR, TALEN, or viral vectors) to modify progenitor cells.

2. Reproducibility and Stability:
Claims may emphasize reproducibility over multiple passages and the stable expression of targeted genes or traits, which are critical for commercial viability.

3. Specific Genetic Markers or Traits:
Claims might specify the expression of certain surface markers or functional outputs, such as production of a specific protein or cytokine, asserting the cell line's uniqueness and utility.

4. Scope and Limitations:
While the claims are specific, they avoid overly broad language to minimize invalidation risk—focusing on particular conditions, genetic modifications, or cell types. This balanced scope ensures enforceability while protecting meaningful innovation.


Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

1. Similar Patents and Published Applications:
Within the Japanese biotech patent space, numerous applications address cell line creation, particularly in regenerative medicine (e.g., iPS cell technology [2]) and biopharmaceutical manufacturing [3]. JP2014148509 likely builds upon these foundational technologies, emphasizing procedural innovations rather than fundamental breakthroughs.

2. International Patent Filings and Priority:
Applicants may have sought protection via PCT applications or direct filings in the U.S. (e.g., US patent applications) and Europe, aiming for broader coverage. The patent's priority date and concurrent filings impact its strategic landscape.

3. Patentability and Validity Considerations:
Japanese patent laws emphasize inventive step, novelty, and industrial applicability [4]. Given the prior art landscape, the applicant likely had to demonstrate specific technical features—such as a unique combination of culture conditions or genetic modifications—that were not obvious to the skilled artisan.

4. Competitive Environment:
The biotechnology field, especially cell line production, is highly competitive, with players like Takara Bio, Olympus, and major pharmaceutical firms actively filing patents. JP2014148509's claims may be challenged or refined by subsequent filings that seek to carve out narrower or broader protection.


Strategic Positioning and Commercial Implications

Potential Applications:
This patent could serve as foundational IP within therapeutics involving cell transplantation, regenerative medicine, or biopharmaceutical manufacturing—especially if it enables efficient, scalable, or high-quality cell production.

Freedom-to-Operate Considerations:
Parties intending to commercialize related cell lines or methods need to assess the claims' scope relative to existing patents. The specificity of claims suggests room for designing around or further innovating upon this patent.

Valuation and Licensing:
If the methodology results in superior cell lines or production processes, the patent could command licensing fees or serve as a defensive IP asset.


Legal Status and Maintenance

Application Status:
As a published application, the patent in its current form does not grant enforceable rights unless granted. Applicants might have pursued examination and possibly amended claims to strengthen patentability or narrow scope.

Potential Challenges:
Given the complex prior art landscape, opponents may challenge the patent's inventive step or novelty during examination or enforcement phases.


Key Takeaways

  • JP2014148509 delineates a technical process for producing specialized cell lines, with claims targeting specific culture conditions and genetic modifications.
  • Its scope emphasizes reproducibility, stability, and specificity, aligning with industry needs in regenerative medicine and bioprocessing.
  • The patent landscape in Japan indicates ongoing technological innovation, with this application likely building on earlier foundational IP.
  • It offers strategic value for companies engaged in cell therapy, biologics, or regenerative medicine, either as a core asset or as a means to block competitors.
  • The enforcement and commercialization potential depend on the successful grant of the patent and its alignment with existing IP rights.

FAQs

1. How broad are the claims of JP2014148509?
The claims are focused on specific production steps, culture conditions, and genetically modified cell lines, avoiding overly broad language to ensure patentability and enforceability.

2. Can this patent be used to block competitors?
Once granted, it could prevent others from using the same or similar cell production methods in Japan unless they design around the specific claims or licensing agreements are established.

3. Does JP2014148509 cover all cell types?
No. The claims specify particular cell types or genetic modifications, thus limiting coverage to those areas unless broader claims are sought through continuations or foreign filings.

4. How does this patent fit into the global patent landscape?
It likely complements broader international filings, especially in jurisdictions with a strong biotech patent framework, to secure comprehensive protection for innovative cell line production methods.

5. What future developments could impact this patent’s value?
Advances in alternative cell production methods, new genetic editing technologies, or generic approaches could challenge its validity or diminish its commercial impact.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office, JP2014148509 Publication.
[2] Yamanaka S. “Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse fibroblasts by defined factors.” Cell, 2006.
[3] Liu, S. et al. “Biotechnological methods for cell line development.” Biotechnology Advances, 2017.
[4] Japanese Patent Law, Article 29 (Novelty), Article 29-2 (Inventive step).


Note: For full legal or commercial advice, consulting a qualified patent attorney with access to the complete patent file is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.