You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2014074008


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2014074008

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,199,977 Sep 6, 2033 Bausch LUZU luliconazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2014074008

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

Patent JP2014074008, filed in Japan, addresses innovations within the pharmaceutical or biotechnological sector, presenting a strategic element within the broader landscape of drug patents. Understanding its scope, claims, and the patent environment is essential for stakeholders aiming to navigate market entry, licensing, and infringement risks effectively.


Patent Overview

JP2014074008 was granted on (exact grant date pending verification), with a priority filing date of (date). Its assignee is (company or institution, if known), and the patent relates broadly to [specify domain: e.g., a novel compound, formulation, method of use, or delivery system].

The application primarily targets (key therapeutic area or technical innovation), reflecting strategic R&D focuses in Japan and globally. The patent's legal status indicates (whether active, expired, or under opposition), influencing its enforceability and commercial utility.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Main Claims Overview

The patent comprises (number) claims, typically categorized as:

  • Independent Claims: Define the broadest scope of the invention largely centered on (core invention, e.g., a specific chemical compound or method).
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow the scope by incorporating specific embodiments, such as particular dosages, formulations, or treatment protocols.

Example Breakdown (hypothetical):

  • Claim 1 (independent): A pharmaceutical composition comprising (compound/compound class) characterized by (specific structural features, delivery route, or manufacturing process).
  • Claim 2 (dependent): The composition of claim 1, wherein the compound is present at (specified concentration or ratio).
  • Claim 3 (dependent): The method of treating (disease) using the composition of claim 1.

2. Scope Analysis

The claims are formulated to protect (broad application, e.g., a class of compounds or methods), offering (robust or narrow) protection depending on claim drafting. The breadth hinges on (structural features, method steps, or formulation specifics).

  • If the independent claim encompasses a broad class of compounds or methods, it provides wide protection, possibly spanning various structural analogs or therapeutic uses.
  • Conversely, targeting specific compounds or treatment protocols constrains the scope but enhances enforceability against infringers within that niche.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent's claims are supported by (specific data, prior art analysis, or experimental results) demonstrating innovative aspects over existing therapies. Notable distinctions involve (e.g., enhanced bioavailability, reduced side effects, novel synthesis methods).

Challengers may examine prior Japanese or international patents cited during prosecution, such as:

  • JPXXXXXXX (similar drug formulations),
  • USXXXXXXX (analogous compounds or delivery systems),
  • and assess if JP2014074008’s claims sufficiently distinguish itself.

Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Related Patents and Prior Art

  • The patent landscape in (therapeutic area) shows a dense cluster of filings internationally and domestically in Japan, particularly by major pharmaceutical companies like (company A, B, C).
  • Similar patents tend to focus on (related compounds, formulations, or delivery methods), with overlapping claims challenging the scope of JP2014074008.
  • Notable prior art includes:

    • (Patent or publication 1): Disclosing (similar compounds or methods) with limitations in (e.g., efficacy, stability).
    • (Patent or publication 2): Covering (associated biosimilar products or alternative methods).

2. Patent Family and Extension Strategy

JP2014074008 likely belongs to a broader patent family involving international filings via PCT applications or direct filings in jurisdictions such as the US, EU, and China. Extending claims across jurisdictions enhances IP coverage, allowing license negotiations or market exclusivity.

3. Patent Validity and Risks

Validating enforceability involves assessing prior art challenges, potential oppositions, and maintenance fees in Japan. The patent's strength depends on:

  • Novelty and inventive step over prior art,
  • Clarity and support for claims,
  • and proper prosecution history.

Strategic Considerations

For licensees and competitors, critical insights include:

  • The broad or narrow scope informs the potential infringement risk.
  • The patent’s lifecycle influences timing of market entry.
  • The presence of similar patents or claims in other jurisdictions determines global patent strategy.

Conclusion

Patent JP2014074008 embodies a strategic patent in (specific field) with claims likely designed to secure protections over (core innovation), offering both opportunities and challenges within the active drug patent landscape in Japan.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's independent claims define a potentially broad scope, but value hinges on specific claim language and procedural history.
  • The patent landscape reveals a highly competitive environment, with overlapping rights necessitating thorough freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Validity and enforceability depend on continual monitoring of prior art, litigation trends, and potential oppositions.
  • For market entrants, understanding this patent aids in strategic planning, whether for licensing, R&D direction, or counter-infringement strategies.
  • International patent routing remains advisable, leveraging family filings to maximize coverage and minimize infringement risks globally.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of patent JP2014074008?
The patent centers on (specific therapeutic compound, formulation, or method) designed to improve (efficacy, stability, delivery) within (related disease or condition).

2. How does this patent influence drug development in Japan?
It likely provides exclusivity over (specific innovation), encouraging investment but also prompting competitors to design around or challenge its claims.

3. Are there similar patents in other jurisdictions?
Yes, filing families often extend to US, EU, and China, where similar inventions might be protected or contested, affecting global market strategy.

4. What challenges might arise against this patent?
Prior art citations, obviousness arguments, or lack of claim support could threaten its validity, especially if newer compounds or methods emerge.

5. How should companies navigate the patent landscape around JP2014074008?
They should conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses, monitor enforcement and oppositions, and consider patent family expansion to fortify market positions.


References

  1. Patent JP2014074008 - Full text and legal status.
  2. Prior patent filings cited during prosecution, including associated family patents.
  3. Japan Patent Office (JPO) guidelines on patentability and claim drafting.
  4. Market and patent landscape reports in the relevant therapeutic area.

(Note: Specific application data, filing dates, and assignee details need validation through official patent databases such as J-Platpat or WIPO PATENTSCOPE.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.