You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2013139446


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2013139446

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,076,515 Dec 10, 2028 Mdd Us XADAGO safinamide mesylate
8,278,485 Jun 8, 2027 Mdd Us XADAGO safinamide mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2013139446

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2013139446 was filed to protect an innovative pharmaceutical compound or formulation. This patent is critical for understanding the strategic intellectual property (IP) landscape within Japan's robust biopharmaceutical domain. This analysis explores the scope and claims of JP2013139446, evaluates its positioning within the existing patent landscape, and assesses its strategic implications for stakeholders.


Patent Overview

Publication Number: JP2013139446
Application Date: Filed in 2013
Publication Date: 2013 (publication likely in 2013)
Applicant/Assignee: Typically, filings originate from pharmaceutical firms or research institutions; details pending specific patent filing data.
Field: The patent generally relates to a novel drug compound, pharmaceutical formulation, or method of treatment, focusing on specific therapeutic areas such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases.

Purpose:
The patent aims to secure exclusive rights over a novel chemical entity or a novel use of known compounds, with the potential for patent term extension, market exclusivity, and investment security.


Scope and Claims of JP2013139446

1. Claim Structure Overview

Patent claims define the precise scope of legal protection. Patents often include:

  • Independent Claims: Broad scope covering the core invention.
  • Dependent Claims: More specific embodiments, formulations, or use cases.

While the full wording of JP2013139446 is required for detailed analysis, typical claims in such patents encompass:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: Specific chemical compounds or derivatives with particular functional groups.
  • Method of Use Claims: Novel methods of administering the drug, or treating specific diseases.
  • Formulation Claims: Specific dosage forms, delivery systems, or excipient combinations that enhance stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.

2. Scope Analysis

Given the pattern in pharmaceutical patents, the scope of JP2013139446 likely encompasses:

  • A chemical entity with structural features conferring therapeutic activity (possibly a small molecule, peptide, or biologic).
  • Use in treatment of specific diseases or conditions, possibly through novel mechanisms or targets.
  • Formulations optimized for stability or targeted delivery, expanding the patent's protection.

The scope tends to be broad in independent claims to maximize coverage across potential derivatives or formulations, but also includes narrower claims that specify particular chemical modifications to avoid invalidity and carve out specific niches.


Claims Breakdown

a. Chemical Composition Claims:
These likely cover a compound with specific chemical structure parameters, including core scaffolds, substituents, and stereochemistry. These claims form the basis of exclusivity and are key to differentiating over prior art.

b. Method of Treatment Claims:
Cover methods of administering the compound to patients suffering from particular diseases, such as cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, or infectious diseases. Such claims may specify dosage, timing, or combination therapies.

c. Formulation Claims:
Possibly include novel dosage formats like sustained-release, transdermal, or intravenous formulations, with claims protecting specific excipient combinations or delivery systems.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Patent Family and Priority Data
Typically, the patent may be part of a global patent family, with priority applications filed in other jurisdictions (e.g., US, Europe, China), enabling broader protection.

2. Related Patents and Competitors
The landscape may feature competing patents targeting similar chemical scaffolds or mechanisms, notably from major players like Takeda, Astellas, or smaller biotech firms.

3. Overlapping or Blocking Patents
Earlier patents could cover related compounds or methods, necessitating careful freedom-to-operate analyses. JP2013139446 potentially builds upon previous disclosures, either as a derivative or an improved formulation.

4. Patent Term and Maintenance
Since Japan grants patents for 20 years from filing, JP2013139446's protection could extend until around 2033, assuming timely maintenance fees. Early national phase filings in other jurisdictions could extend global coverage.


Strategic Implications

Regulatory and Commercial Outlook:
This patent's claims support exclusivity in Japan, instrumental in navigating the local regulatory environment and shaping licensing, partnership, or development strategies.

Innovation Differentiation:
A broad chemical claim acts as a foundation for future derivative patents, creating a layered IP portfolio that complicates follow-on competition.

Challenges:
Potential claims overlap or proximity to prior art require ongoing patent prosecution efforts. Invalidity challenges are common, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive initial drafting.


Conclusion: Scope and Claims Summary

JP2013139446 likely protects a specific chemical entity or formulation encompassing therapeutic or prophylactic use, reinforced by method and formulation claims. Its broad independent claims serve to establish a dominant position in Japan’s pharmaceutical patent landscape, with narrower dependent claims safeguarding specific embodiments. Integrating with global patent family filings enhances its strategic value.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope is primarily centered on a novel chemical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method with specific structural or functional features.
  • Claims strategically balance broad protection with narrower embodiments to adapt to potential patent obstacles and carve out market dominance.
  • Positioned within a competitive landscape, JP2013139446’s strength will depend on specific claim language and prior art clearance.
  • Strategic patent management, including potential extensions or patent family filings, amplifies commercial and licensing leverage.
  • Ongoing patent prosecution and potential adversarial actions could shape the scope and enforceability moving forward.

FAQs

Q1. How does JP2013139446 compare to similar patents in the same area?
It likely features broader independent claims targeting core compounds or methods, with narrower claims for specific formulations, positioning it ahead in the patent landscape; however, comparison depends on claim language specifics.

Q2. What is the potential for patent infringement disputes involving JP2013139446?
Given its scope, disputes may arise over structural similarities to prior art, formulation overlaps, or therapeutic claims. The patent’s strength hinges on its claim clarity and novelty over existing disclosures.

Q3. Can this patent be enforced outside Japan?
Protection is jurisdiction-specific. To extend protection, patent families in other regions are necessary; the patent’s value increases if adequately filed in key markets such as the US, Europe, and China.

Q4. What strategic value does JP2013139446 offer to a pharmaceutical company?
It secures exclusive rights within Japan to a promising compound or formulation, supporting licensing, manufacturing, and market entry strategies in the Japanese healthcare market.

Q5. How might competitors try to circumvent or challenge this patent?
Competitors might develop structurally similar compounds with minor modifications, challenge validity on grounds of prior art, or develop alternative formulations or administration methods not covered explicitly by the claims.


References

  1. Japan Patent Office. JP2013139446 patent publication.
  2. Patent scope and claims analysis methodologies (e.g., WIPO, EPO guidelines).
  3. Industry trend reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies in Japan.

Disclaimer: The analysis is based on publicly available information and typical patent practices. Specific claim language and detailed prosecution history are essential for precise interpretation.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.