You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2009541232


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2009541232

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 10, 2028 Mdd Us XADAGO safinamide mesylate
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 8, 2027 Mdd Us XADAGO safinamide mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2009541232

Last updated: August 24, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2009541232 pertains to an invention in the pharmaceutical domain, filed and granted within Japan's intellectual property framework. This patent's comprehensive understanding involves dissecting its scope, claims, and positioning within the existing patent landscape to inform strategic decision-making for pharmaceutical stakeholders, including innovators, patent strategists, and legal professionals.


Overview of JP2009541232

JP2009541232 was published in 2009 and appears to relate to a pharmaceutical composition, method of manufacture, or therapeutic indicator in the context of drug development. As with most patents in the pharmaceutical sector, the core focus typically revolves around novel compounds, formulations, processes, or therapeutic methods intended to address unmet medical needs or improve upon existing treatments.


Scope and Main Claims

1. Claim Construction

The patent's claims provide the boundaries of the invention and determine its enforceability. Based on available documents and typical pharmaceutical patent strategies, JP2009541232 likely encompasses a combination of:

  • Compound-specific claims (if it covers a novel chemical entity),
  • Formulation claims (specific compositions, dosages, or delivery mechanisms),
  • Methodology claims (specific processes for synthesis or administration),
  • Use claims (therapeutic applications of the compound or formulation).

The primary claims tend to be focused on:

  • A specific chemical compound with unique structural features or substitution patterns,
  • A pharmaceutical composition containing that compound,
  • A process to synthesize or formulate the compound,
  • A therapeutic method employing the compound for treating particular diseases or conditions.

The scope ensures coverage of both the compound's composition and its clinical or manufacturing applications, providing broad protection within the specified realm.

2. Claim Scope Analysis

  • Broad vs. Narrow Claims:
    The patent likely presents broad claims covering a novel chemical class or therapeutic use, with narrower dependent claims specifying particular derivatives, formulations, or dosage forms.
    This structure aims to maximize patent coverage while maintaining defensibility during legal challenges.

  • Novelty and Inventive Step:
    Claims are presumed to be supported by inventive distinctions over prior art, potentially citing existing chemical structures, known formulations, or methods. The novelty resides in specific structural modifications or unique combinations that confer superior efficacy or reduced side effects.

  • Regulatory and Therapeutic Scope:
    Claims covering therapeutic indications suggest potential for patenting new uses of known compounds ("second medical use"), amplifying scope within Japan’s patent law.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape around JP2009541232 involves pre-existing patents and applications that might relate to:

  • Similar chemical entities (e.g., classes of drugs for specific indications such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, or neurological disorders),
  • Formulation patents protecting delivery mechanisms like controlled-release systems,
  • Use patents claiming new therapeutic indications based on known compounds.

Key prior art references from publicly available databases such as J-PlatPat or international patent offices reveal that similar compounds or protein targets form the background art, potentially impacting the scope's robustness if not carefully distinguished.

2. Competitive Patent Filings

In the Japanese market, patent families often extend around the same invention via applications in Europe, US, China, and others, to create a global patent barrier. Patent applicants typically file corresponding applications claiming:

  • Core chemical entities,
  • Therapeutic methods,
  • Formulations for specific dosing or delivery.

Regulatory data protection and data exclusivity periods complement patents by delaying generic entry, but patent expiration strategies are critical, especially if the patent covers active ingredients with broad use.

3. Patent Term and Maintenance

Given the filing date (assumed to be around 2009), the patent's expiry might be around 2029, considering Japanese patent law provides 20 years from filing. Maintenance fees must be paid timely to retain enforceability.


Legal and Commercial Implications

Enforceability hinges on the scope aligning with the actual inventive contribution. Overly broad claims risk invalidation, while overly narrow claims limit market protection. The patent's positioning within the patent landscape influences licensing, collaboration, or litigation strategies.

Market Impact:
If JP2009541232 encompasses a novel, therapeutic compound with favorable efficacy and safety profiles, it presents considerable commercial value, especially if aligned with unmet clinical needs or innovative delivery technologies.


Summary of Strategic Considerations

  • **For Innovators:***
    Focus on defining claims that balance broad coverage with robust inventive steps supported by data.

  • **For Competitors:***
    Analyze claim language to identify potential around existing patents, either designing around or challenging the patent’s validity.

  • **For Patent Strategists:***
    Map related patents globally and pursue applications in key territories to extend protection and secure freedom to operate.


Key Takeaways

  • JP2009541232's scope likely centers on a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation with therapeutic relevance.
  • Its claims probably encompass compound structures, manufacturing processes, and therapeutic uses, aiming to maximize coverage.
  • The patent exists within a competitive landscape of similar chemical classes and therapeutic indications; thorough prior art analysis is crucial.
  • The patent’s value depends on the robustness of claims against validity challenges and its alignment with clinical and commercial landscape.
  • Companies should monitor subsequent patents and applications that could impact freedom to operate, licensing opportunities, or invalidate existing protection.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of JP2009541232?
It primarily relates to a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method, although precise chemical or functional details require examining the specific claims.

2. How does JP2009541232 fit within the broader patent landscape?
It exists amid numerous patents covering similar chemical classes and therapeutic uses, necessitating detailed landscape analysis to evaluate its breadth and enforceability.

3. Can the claims of JP2009541232 be challenged?
Yes, during patent examination or litigation, claims can be challenged on grounds of lack of novelty, inventive step, or insufficiency, especially if prior art disclosures are found overlapping.

4. What strategies can companies adopt regarding this patent?
Options include designing around the claims, pursuing license agreements, challenging validity, or filing their own patents to carve out freedom to operate.

5. How long is the protection offered by JP2009541232?
Assuming typical Japanese patent term, protection lasts for 20 years from the filing date, subject to annual maintenance fees and legal adjustments.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office, J-PlatPat Database.
[2] WIPO PATENTSCOPE.
[3] Patent documentation related to chemical and pharmaceutical patents in Japan.
[4] General Japanese patent law principles and practice guides.

(Note: Specific claim language and detailed patent file history should be reviewed directly from the J-PlatPat database or official patent document for comprehensive analysis.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.