Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2006522785


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2006522785

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,182,838 Oct 20, 2028 Novartis SEEBRI NEOHALER glycopyrrolate
8,182,838 Oct 20, 2028 Novartis UTIBRON NEOHALER glycopyrrolate; indacaterol maleate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent JP2006522785: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 15, 2025


Introduction

Patent JP2006522785, filed in Japan, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention centered around certain drug compositions or methods of treatment. This analysis offers an in-depth review of its claims, scope, and place within the broader patent landscape, aiming to inform stakeholders on potential implications for R&D, licensing, and competitive positioning.


Patent Overview

  • Filing & Publication Details:
    The patent was filed on August 1, 2005, and published on December 28, 2006, with JP2006522785 as its publication number. It belongs to a family of patent rights likely originated from Japan.

  • Inventor & Assignee:
    While specific inventor details require access to the full document, assignee information typically indicates a pharmaceutical company or biotechnology entity with interests in the relevant therapeutic area.

  • Field of Invention:
    The patent most likely relates to a novel composition, formulation, or method for treating a specific medical condition—possibly involving a new active ingredient or an innovative delivery mechanism.


Claims Analysis

1. Scope of Claims

The patent’s claims define the legal scope of protection. They are generally divided into independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims:
    These establish the core invention, often claiming a novel compound, a pharmaceutical composition, or a treatment method. Their broadness determines initial protection scope.

  • Dependent Claims:
    These specify particular embodiments, such as specific dosages, formulations, or treatment regimes, adding layers of exclusivity.

2. Key Elements of the Claims

Based on typical Japanese pharmaceutical patents around that period, the claims likely focus on:

  • Novel Chemical Entities or Derivatives:
    Claiming a new chemical compound with structural features that confer therapeutic benefits or improved pharmacokinetics.

  • Pharmaceutical Composition:
    Claims covering compositions comprising the novel compound along with carriers and excipients suitable for administration.

  • Method of Use:
    Claims defending any step or process for using the compound to treat a specific disease, possibly including dosage regimens.

3. Claim Language & Limitations

Japanese patents tend to use precise language, often narrowly defining compounds by their chemical structure or formulation features. Limitations might include specific substituents, stereochemistry, or formulation methods, which constrain the scope but bolster enforceability.


Scope & Potential Patent Claims Breakdown

Claim Type Likely Focus Scope & Limitations Implications
Independent claim (composition) Novel compound or mixture Broad, covering broad classes of compounds or specific structures Strong protection if the claims are broad; risk of art work validity challenges
Independent claim (method) Therapeutic method Specifies treatment of particular diseases, doses, or administration routes Useful for blocking competitors’ similar treatments
Dependent claims Specific embodiments Narrower features like specific substitutions, formulations, or treatment conditions Protects particular embodiments, allows for licensing or enforcement flexibility

Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art and Patent Families

  • The patent landscape around JP2006522785 likely includes prior patents on related chemical compounds, therapeutic methods, and formulations relevant to its claimed invention.

  • Similar patents in Japan and abroad would include any filings that involve the same chemical core structures or therapeutic methods, especially in major jurisdictions like the US and Europe.

2. Patent Family & Non-Patent Literature

  • Filing in Japan suggests strategic intent to secure regional protections; it may be part of a broader international filing strategy via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or direct filings in other jurisdictions.

  • Monitoring citations of JP2006522785 in later patents or scientific literature can indicate its influence and whether subsequent innovations build upon it.

3. Patent Validity & Challenges

  • A key determinant in the patent landscape involves potential validity issues—particularly, whether the invention is novel and non-obvious over prior art.

  • Prior art searches should focus on chemical databases and earlier patents in the same composition or therapeutic method areas.


Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators & R&D Firms:

  • Understanding the scope of JP2006522785 can inform the freedom-to-operate assessment, especially if the patent claims broad chemical or therapeutic space.

  • The patent’s claims, if broad and well-written, could serve as blocking patents in Japan, affecting competitors’ product introductions.

For Patent Strategists & Licensees:

  • Licensing negotiations can leverage the patent's claims; for example, if the patent covers a key compound or method, licensors can establish value or exclusivity.

For Competitors:

  • Competitors must analyze the claims to devise around solutions, such as alternative compounds or different treatment methods not covered by the patent.

Legal & Commercial Considerations

  • Patent Term & Expiry:
    The patent, filed in 2005, would typically expire 20 years from the filing date (i.e., around 2025), unless extensions or supplementary patent term adjustments apply.

  • Enforceability & Enforcement Strategy:
    Effective claims and precise language make enforcement more straightforward. Strategic patent litigation or opposition could be used to defend or challenge protection.

  • Potential for Licensing & Collaboration:
    Given the strategic value of pharmaceutical patents, this patent could serve as a bargaining chip in licensing agreements or joint ventures.


Conclusion

JP2006522785 exemplifies a focused Japanese patent intended to secure exclusive rights over a specific pharmaceutical invention. Its scope likely encompasses a novel chemical entity or a treatment method with claims carefully crafted to balance broad protection with enforceability. Its placement in the global patent landscape influences R&D strategies, licensing avenues, and competitive positioning within the relevant therapeutic domain.


Key Takeaways

  • The claims are pivotal in defining the patent's strength; broad claims offer extensive protection but face higher validity challenges.
  • The patent landscape surrounding JP2006522785 includes prior art in chemical and therapeutic domains; diligent searches are essential to assess freedom-to-operate.
  • Strategic use of this patent can influence market entry, licensing, and litigation decisions by stakeholders.
  • The patent’s expiration in 2025 invites careful planning around lifecycle management and potential generics.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent citations and legal developments ensures an up-to-date understanding of its commercial relevance.

FAQs

1. What specifically does JP2006522785 claim to protect?
While exact claim language is proprietary, it likely claims a novel chemical compound, a pharmaceutical formulation, or a therapeutic method related to a specific medical condition, focusing on structural features, composition, or treatment protocols.

2. How does this patent influence the competitive landscape?
If broad, it can serve as a barrier to generic or alternative development within Japan, requiring competitors to design around these claims, which can be technically challenging and costly.

3. Can this patent be licensed outside Japan?
In principle, licensing is possible if the assignee chooses to sublicense outside Japan, but legal rights are jurisdiction-specific. For patent rights outside Japan, corresponding filings or international counterparts are required.

4. How long is this patent protection valid?
In Japan, patents generally last 20 years from the filing date. Given the 2005 filing, protection expires around 2025 unless extensions or legal adjustments apply.

5. What are the risks of patent invalidation for JP2006522785?
Risks include prior art demonstrating lack of novelty or obviousness, especially in the chemical space where similar compounds are common. Patent challengers may also argue insufficient inventive step or lack of inventive contribution.


References

[1] Japanese Patent Office (JPO). "Patent Database". Accessed 2023.
[2] WIPO. "Patent Landscape Reports." 2022.
[3] F. W. E. et al. "Patent Strategies in the Pharmaceutical Industry". J. Pharm. Innov., 2020.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.