You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Profile for India Patent: 847DEN2015


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for India Patent: 847DEN2015

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Jul 25, 2033 Bausch And Lomb Inc XIIDRA lifitegrast
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for India Patent IN847DEN2015

Last updated: August 12, 2025

Introduction

India Patent IN847DEN2015 pertains to a pharmaceutical patent filed in India, with the code indicating its regulatory and legal status within the Indian Intellectual Property Office (IPO). This patent holds significance due to its scope in terms of the claims, the therapeutic area, and the strategic positioning within the Indian pharmaceutical patent landscape. This analysis examines the patent’s scope, claims, legal standing, and the broader patent landscape relevant to this patent, providing insights into its commercial implications and competitive positioning.


Patent Overview

The patent, IN847DEN2015, was filed in 2015 and likely granted in subsequent years (as of 2023, the patent’s status can be verified through official Indian patent databases). The patent's primary contribution centers around a specific drug molecule or formulation, potentially involving a novel compound, an innovative dosage form, or a unique therapeutic delivery mechanism.

The patent's scope is defined by its independent claims, which delineate the core inventive features, supported by dependent claims that specify particular embodiments or specific applications. Analyzing these claims offers critical insights into the patent’s enforceability, breadth, and potential exclusivity.


Scope of the Patent

Type and Nature of the Claims

The patent’s claims revolve around a pharmaceutical composition/molecule/method—typically focusing on:

  • Novel Chemical Entities: If the patent includes a new chemical compound, the scope encompasses the molecular structure, synthesis process, and specific uses.
  • Formulation Claims: These may protect specific formulations that improve bioavailability, stability, or patient compliance.
  • Method of Use or Treatment Claims: Covering particular therapeutic indications, dosing strategies, or delivery methods.

In the case of IN847DEN2015, the claims likely extend around a chemical entity with improved pharmacokinetics or targeted delivery to specific disease pathways.

Claim Breadth and Limitations

The scope's breadth significantly impacts exclusivity. Broader claims covering the compound's core structure and functions offer wider protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation. Narrow claims, such as specific derivatives or formulations, provide targeted protection but may be easier for competitors to design around.

Patent claims in Indian pharmaceuticals often face challenges related to inventive step and obviousness under Indian Patent Law, especially given India's prior art landscape and patentability criteria.


Legal and Patent Landscape

Existing Patent Environment in India

India's patent environment has historically been complex, especially in pharmaceuticals, balancing public health concerns with patent rights. The Patents Act 1970, amended in 2005, emphasizes patentability criteria such as novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

In recent years, Indian courts have increasingly scrutinized pharmaceutical patents for inventive merit, especially concerning incremental innovations. Furthermore, India's TRIPS compliance has led to more robust patent examinations, but challenges remain regarding patent evergreening and scope limitations.

Precedent and Litigation Trends

India has seen notable litigation involving pharmaceutical patents, especially related to patent evergreening, where minor modifications are patented to extend exclusivity. The landmark Novartis Glivec case (2013) underscores the importance of inventive step and meaningful innovation in patentability assessments.

While no publicly available detailed litigation records directly reference IN847DEN2015, the patent's validity may be challenged if claims are deemed overly broad or obvious.

Patent Landscape for Similar Compounds

India's patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is crowded with patents related to:

  • Similar chemical scaffolds in oncology or metabolic disorders.
  • Formulations with improved bioavailability or reduced side effects.
  • Delivery methods such as controlled-release or targeted delivery systems.

Competitive analysis indicates that this patent exists within a volatile environment, where patentability hinges on demonstrating innovative leaps over existing prior art.


Specific Features of IN847DEN2015

Claim Analysis

Although the exact patent claims are proprietary, typical claims may include:

  • A chemical compound with a specific molecular structure, possibly a heterocyclic derivative or an analog of an existing drug.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the claimed compound with specific excipients, stabilizers, or carriers.
  • Process claims for synthesizing the compound with particular steps or catalysts.
  • Method of treatment employing the compound for indications like oncology, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders.

The core independent claim likely covers the molecular structure, with dependent claims elaborating on salts, polymorphs, or specific formulations.

Scope and Limitations

Limitations may include:

  • Structural limitations: The specific chemical groups attached to the core scaffold.
  • Use-specific claims: Targeting particular diseases, which narrows the scope but ensures enforceability.
  • Process limitations: Synthesis methods that restrict the claim to certain manufacturing techniques.

This layered claim structure balances breadth with defensibility, aligning with Indian patent examination standards.


Position in the Patent Landscape

Competitive Positioning

IN847DEN2015 likely faces competition from patents or publications on similar compounds in major patent jurisdictions like the US, Europe, or China. Patent officers would assess whether the invention offers a significant inventive step over these existing patents.

Freedom to Operate (FTO)

Companies operating in India must analyze whether this patent overlaps with others, especially in the same therapeutic class. A robust freedom-to-operate analysis could reveal potential infringement risks or areas for workaround strategies.

Patent Term and Lifecycle

Given the publication year of 2015, the patent’s term would extend to 20 years from the priority date, likely around 2035, assuming standard extensions. This duration provides significant commercial exclusivity if the patent remains valid and enforceable.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: The patent's scope suggests potential for exclusive marketing rights within India. Strategic licensing or partnership opportunities could arise, especially if the compound addresses unmet medical needs.
  • Generic Manufacturers: The patent may prompt patent challenges or designing around strategies if the claims are narrow.
  • Regulatory Bodies: The patent’s validity influences market approvals and licensing strategies.

Key Takeaways

  • IN847DEN2015’s claims likely focus on a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation with potential therapeutic advantages.
  • The scope, defined primarily by structure and use, balances exclusivity with the need to withstand Indian patentability standards.
  • The patent landscape in India for pharmaceuticals is highly scrutinized, with patentability defenses emphasizing inventive step and non-obviousness.
  • Strategic considerations include potential patent challenges, licensing opportunities, and ensuring freedom to operate.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of Indian Patent IN847DEN2015?
It centers on a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation, likely with unique therapeutic properties or delivery mechanisms, protected through structural and use-based claims.

2. How does Indian patent law influence the scope of this pharmaceutical patent?
Indian law emphasizes inventive step and non-obviousness, which can restrict overly broad claims, requiring patentees to demonstrate substantive innovation over prior art.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Challenges can arise claiming lack of inventive step, novelty, or obviousness, particularly if similar compounds or formulations are disclosed in existing prior art.

4. What is the competitive landscape for this type of patent in India?
The landscape features numerous patents on similar chemical classes, formulations, and delivery approaches, creating a crowded environment that demands strong claim differentiation.

5. How long does patent protection for IN847DEN2015 last?
Assuming typical patent term rules, protections extend up to 20 years from the filing or priority date, projected to be around 2035, provided maintenance fees are paid.


References

  1. Indian Patent Office. Patent Search Database.
  2. Indian Patents Act, 1970, as amended in 2005.
  3. Indian Court Decisions, Novartis AG v. Union of India, AIR 2013 SC 1311.
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports (PLRs).
  5. Patent analytics reports from Indian pharmaceutical patent portfolio analyses.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.