You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Israel Patent: 310250


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Israel Patent: 310250

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 5, 2037 Liquidia Tech YUTREPIA treprostinil sodium
⤷  Get Started Free May 5, 2037 Liquidia Tech YUTREPIA treprostinil sodium
⤷  Get Started Free May 5, 2037 Liquidia Tech YUTREPIA treprostinil sodium
⤷  Get Started Free May 5, 2037 Liquidia Tech YUTREPIA treprostinil sodium
⤷  Get Started Free May 5, 2037 Liquidia Tech YUTREPIA treprostinil sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Israel Patent IL310250

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

Israel Patent IL310250 pertains to a proprietary pharmaceutical invention subject to patent protections in Israel. This analysis dissects the patent’s scope, claims, and its positioning within the patent landscape to provide insights for industry stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, patent strategists, and R&D entities.


Overview of Patent IL310250

Patent Title: Not explicitly provided, but related to a novel drug or delivery mechanism.

Filing Date: The patent was filed in Israel and reflects a priority date likely in the recent past (circa 2020s). Exact dates are critical to establish patent term and prior art landscape.

Grant Status: Assuming granted, as the patent is identified by an IL number, it provides enforceable rights within Israel.

Jurisdiction: Israel patents are territorial, but such patents often form part of broader international patent strategies, including PCT applications or regional filings.


Scope of the Patent

1. Subject Matter

The patent appears to cover a novel drug compound, its specific formulation, or a novel medical delivery mechanism. The scope may encompass:

  • Chemical composition: A unique molecule or a new polymorph.
  • Method of manufacturing: Processes for producing the drug or compound.
  • Therapeutic application: Specific medical indications or treatment methods.
  • Delivery systems: Novel formulations such as sustained-release or targeted delivery.

2. Patent Claims Analysis

Claims define the legal scope. These can be categorized broadly into independent and dependent claims.

  • Independent Claims: Likely specify the core inventive concept, such as a novel chemical entity or process.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, incorporating specific embodiments, such as particular excipient combinations, dosage forms, or methods of use.

Sample Analysis of Claim Language:

While the explicit claims are unavailable here, typical claims in such patents may include:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising an active ingredient with specified chemical structure X-Y.
  • A method of treating disease Z by administering an effective amount of the composition.
  • A delivery device configured to release the drug over a defined period.

3. Claim Strength and Novelty

For robust patent protection, claims are expected to be:

  • Novel: Not disclosed in prior art before the priority date.
  • Non-obvious: The inventive step must not be obvious to a person skilled in the art.
  • Specific: Precise language that delineates the scope without overreach.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Comparative Analysis

  • Domestic Patent Landscape: Other Israeli patents may encompass similar compounds or formulations. IL310250’s novelty hinges on unique structural features or delivery methods.
  • International Landscape: Globally, similar patents may exist in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, or China. Patent filings such as PCT applications can illuminate the international strategy.

2. Infringement Risk and Freedom-to-Operate

  • The broadness of claims influences freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Overlapping patents in core active ingredients or delivery mechanisms may invoke licensing considerations.

3. Patent Families and Continuations

  • The patent’s family members, including continuations and divisional applications, could extend protection or refine claims.
  • Tracking these indicates the patent owner’s strategic intent and breadth of coverage.

4. Cited Art and Prior Art

  • Examination reports (if available) reveal references cited during prosecution.
  • Key references from scientific literature or previous patents can affect enforceability and scope.

Legal and Strategic Implications

  • Protection Strength: Well-defined, narrow claims increase enforceability but may limit scope.
  • Market Opportunities: A strong patent broad in claims can secure exclusive rights, providing a competitive advantage.
  • Patent Challenges: Identifying potential prior art or loopholes enables pre-emptive legal strategies or licensing negotiations.

Conclusion

Patent IL310250 likely encapsulates a novel pharmaceutical invention, with claims designed to secure exclusivity over specific compounds or methods. Its positioning within the Israeli patent landscape and possible international applications underscores its strategic importance.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Precision: The clarity and breadth of IL310250’s claims critically impact its enforceability and market scope.
  • Landscape Awareness: Monitoring related patents and prior art is essential for assessing infringement risks and opportunities in extension filings.
  • Strategic Use: The patent's strength hinges on original features, robust claims, and effective positioning within the global patent environment.
  • Continuity: Maintaining family patents and follow-on applications can extend market exclusivity.
  • Comprehensive Analysis: A detailed review of prosecution history and cited references will further refine strategic decisions pertaining to this patent.

FAQs

Q1: How does IL310250 compare to international patents on similar drugs?

A1: IL310250’s scope depends on its claims; if it claims unique chemical structures or delivery methods, its international counterparts must have similar claims to pose infringement risks. Patent analyses juxtapose claim language and scope to assess overlap.

Q2: What are the common pitfalls in patent claims for pharmaceutical inventions?

A2: Common pitfalls include overly broad claims susceptible to invalidation, lack of specificity, or prior art disclosure. Precise claims balancing breadth and novelty are essential.

Q3: Can IL310250’s patent be challenged post-grant?

A3: Yes, third parties can file oppositions or invalidity petitions based on prior art or lack of inventive step. Such challenges are more robust if claims are broad.

Q4: How do patent claims affect licensing strategies?

A4: Well-drafted claims facilitate licensing negotiations by clearly defining the scope of protection, enabling licensees to assess the freedom to operate.

Q5: What role do patent landscapes play in drug development?

A5: They identify innovation gaps, potential infringement risks, and licensing opportunities, guiding R&D investments and strategic patent filings.


Sources:

  1. Israel Patent Office. Patent IL310250 documentation and prosecution history (where available).
  2. International Patent Classification (IPC) and Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) mappings.
  3. Global patent databases (WIPO PATENTSCOPE, EPO Espacenet) for related patent filings.
  4. Scientific literature on similar drug compounds or delivery systems.
  5. Patent law and strategy references relevant to pharmaceutical patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.