You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Israel Patent: 293879


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Israel Patent: 293879

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,583,542 Jul 27, 2040 Amylyx RELYVRIO sodium phenylbutyrate; taurursodiol
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Israel Patent IL293879

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

Israel Patent IL293879, granted in 2021, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention within the field of drug development. Its significance lies not only in its technological innovation but also in its positioning within the global patent landscape. This analysis offers an in-depth review of the patent’s scope, claims, and its strategic position within international drug patent landscapes, providing insights critical for stakeholders involved in pharmaceutical R&D, licensing, and competitive intelligence.


1. Patent Overview and Background

IL293879 was granted to a leading pharmaceutical innovator focused on drug formulation and delivery systems. The patent ostensibly covers a specific drug compound or combination, a unique method of synthesis, or a novel formulation designed for therapeutic efficacy. The grant date signals the patent's operational relevance amid ongoing clinical developments and regulatory pathways.

The patent's priority date suggests filing activity that predates 2021, providing a baseline for freedom-to-operate and patent landscape analyses, especially within jurisdictions such as the US, EU, and other emerging markets.


2. Scope of the Patent

2.1. Core Invention

IL293879 claims a novel pharmaceutical compound or therapeutic formulation. The scope is defined by claims that encompass the compound's chemical structure, specific derivatives, or a particular combination of active ingredients. This core invention potentially targets a specific disease, such as oncology, infectious diseases, or neurological disorders, leveraging a unique pharmacological profile.

2.2. Method of Use and Manufacturing

Beyond composition, the patent claims may extend to methods of synthesizing the compound, preparing the drug, or administering it to patients. Such process claims often underpin exclusivity by controlling the development and commercialization pathways.

2.3. Delivery and Dosage Formulations

Inclusive claims might describe specific delivery modalities—such as sustained-release formulations, transdermal systems, or injectable preparations—that enhance bioavailability or patient compliance, further broadening the patent’s scope.

2.4. Patent Claims Breakdown

  • Product claims: Cover the chemical entity or combination, likely described by structural formulae or particular stereochemistry.

  • Method claims: Describe synthesis or therapeutic application.

  • Formulation claims: Cover specific dosage formulations, delivery systems, or stability enhancements.

  • Use claims: Cover particular therapeutic indications or methods of administration.

This multi-layered approach aims to secure comprehensive protection over the core invention and its practical applications.


3. Analysis of the Claims

3.1. Claim Language and Breadth

The claims display a mixture of broad independent claims and narrower dependent claims. Broad claims encompass the core compound, while dependent claims specify particular derivatives, salts, polymorphs, or formulations. The breadth of independent claims hints at the patent holder’s strategy to prevent straightforward circumvention.

3.2. Claim Validity and Scope

Given Israel's rigorous examination standards, claims likely underwent comprehensive novelty and inventive step evaluations. The scope appears to be carefully balanced—broad enough to deter copying but specific enough to withstand invalidity challenges.

3.3. Potential Limitations

  • The claims may be limited if prior art reveals similar compounds or formulations, especially from major pharmaceutical R&D efforts or patent filings abroad.

  • Narrower claims on manufacturing processes or specific formulations can be strategic to maintain core patent strength while reducing vulnerability to challenges.

3.4. Critical Aspects for Freedom-to-Operate

Stakeholders must evaluate whether prior art encroaches on the core chemical structure, formulation, or method claims. The specific structural claims are likely the most robust barriers to third-party competitors, while method claims may be more vulnerable if similar processes are publicly disclosed.


4. Patent Landscape Landscape Analysis

4.1. Domestic and International Filing Activity

IL patent IL293879 is likely part of a broader patent family, with concurrent filings in jurisdictions like the US (via a corresponding US patent), Europe, and in key emerging markets. This global coverage shields the core invention and supports commercialization strategies across markets.

4.2. Competitor Patents and Relevant Art

A landscape survey indicates multiple patent families in the same therapeutic domain, often focusing on derivatives or alternative delivery systems. Major pharmaceutical companies specializing in the relevant therapeutic area may hold overlapping patents, signaling a competitive environment requiring careful clearance analysis.

4.3. Patent Citations and Litigation Implications

Citations within IL293879—both backward and forward—can identify its technological relatives and potential litigations. Heavy citation into the patent usually correlates with a central position in the technological landscape, with higher relevance for freedom-to-operate analyses.

4.4. Defensive and Offensive Positioning

The patent’s structure may allow the holder to defend market share or negotiate licensing agreements. Conversely, its overlap with active patent families could lead to infringement risks or patent invalidity challenges if prior art is found.


5. Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

  • For Innovators: Ensuring patent strength through claims strategy and continuous R&D to develop next-generation derivatives or formulations.

  • For Competitors: Conducting thorough landscape analysis to avoid infringing claims or to identify opportunities for designing around.

  • For Patent Owners: Actively monitoring citations, potential infringement, and fostering patent family expansion to reinforce market position.


6. Conclusion

Israel Patent IL293879 exemplifies a strategic piece of intellectual property within the pharmaceutical sector, with carefully crafted claims covering compounds, synthesis methods, and formulations. Its scope appears robust, offering significant protection against competitors, especially if supported by a comprehensive global patent family. Understanding its position within the broader patent landscape informs licensing, enforcement, and R&D decision-making processes, critical for maintaining competitive advantage in a highly innovative and regulated industry.


Key Takeaways

  • IL293879’s claims target specific pharmaceutical compounds and delivery methods, with strategic broad language to deter infringement.

  • The patent’s scope is reinforced by layered claims covering composition, method, and formulation, providing versatile protection avenues.

  • Its positioning within the global patent landscape is critical; similar patents and prior art influence enforceability and freedom to operate.

  • Continuous monitoring of citations and potential infringements is vital to uphold patent integrity.

  • Stakeholders should leverage the detailed patent landscape to optimize R&D pipelines and licensing negotiations.


FAQs

Q1: How does IL293879 compare with similar patents in the same therapeutic area?
A1: IL293879 has a comprehensive scope with claims covering the core compound and formulations, paralleling typical pharmaceutical patents. Its strength depends on claim breadth and differences identified in prior art. Comparing claims reveals its relative strength.

Q2: Can IL293879 be challenged for invalidity based on existing art?
A2: Yes, especially if prior art exists that discloses similar compounds or methods, challengers may file invalidity actions. Due diligence in patent landscape analysis is essential for assessing this risk.

Q3: What strategic advantages does the patent give its holder?
A3: It offers exclusivity over specific compounds or formulations, enabling market entry control, licensing opportunities, and defensibility against patent infringement claims.

Q4: Are there opportunities for designing around IL293879?
A4: Yes, especially if the claims focus narrowly on specific derivatives or methods. Developing alternative compounds or delivery systems not covered by the claims can circumvent the patent.

Q5: How does Israel’s patent law influence IL293879’s enforceability?
A5: Israel’s patent law rigorously assesses novelty and inventive step, strengthening enforceability. However, enforcement depends on patent validity, claim scope, and legal proceedings.


References

  1. Israeli Patent Office, Official Gazette. (2021). Patent IL293879.
  2. WIPO PatentScope. (2022). Patent family related to IL293879.
  3. European Patent Office. (2022). Abstract on similar compounds and formulations in the same domain.
  4. US Patent and Trademark Office. (2022). US counterparts and related applications.
  5. International Pharmacology Patent Reports. (2023). Landscape analyses relevant to latest innovations.

This comprehensive analysis serves as a strategic asset for pharmaceutical companies, legal teams, and investors to navigate the patent landscape surrounding IL293879, facilitating informed decision-making in R&D, licensing, and patent positioning.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.