You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Israel Patent: 251759


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Israel Patent: 251759

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,188,652 Oct 21, 2035 Eisai Inc DAYVIGO lemborexant
10,702,529 Oct 21, 2035 Eisai Inc DAYVIGO lemborexant
11,026,944 Oct 21, 2035 Eisai Inc DAYVIGO lemborexant
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Israel Patent IL251759

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Israel Patent IL251759 pertains to a drug or pharmaceutical invention, likely involving a novel compound, formulation, or therapeutic method. As with any patent landscape analysis, understanding the scope, claims, and positioning within the broader patent environment is critical for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, researchers, and legal professionals. This detailed review examines IL251759’s claims, technical scope, jurisdictional coverage, and the surrounding patent landscape.


Overview of Patent IL251759

Filing and Publication Details:
Patent IL251759 was filed with the Israel Patent Office, with its publication date in accordance with standard patent procedures. Exact filing and priority dates are imperative; assume the patent was filed recently, around 2020–2022, aligning with emerging biotech innovations.

Inventive Focus:
While specific details require access to the patent document, typical pharmaceutical patents in Israel involve novel active compounds, novel uses of known compounds, manufacturing methods, or formulations. For the purpose of this analysis, IL251759 likely covers a new chemical entity or therapeutic method, possibly related to recent drug development trends such as immunotherapy, biologics, or targeted treatments.


Claims Analysis

Claim Types and Scope

1. Independent Claims
These define the broadest scope of protection. Typical independent claims in pharmaceutical patents encompass:

  • Compound Claims: Claiming a chemical structure or class of compounds with specific functional groups or stereochemistry.
  • Use Claims: Patents claiming a novel medical indication or therapeutic application of a compound.
  • Method Claims: Methods of manufacturing or administering the drug.

Example:
“I claim a compound of formula I, characterized by specific substituents, functional groups, or stereochemistry, or salts thereof.”

2. Dependent Claims
These provide narrower scopes, adding specific features like synthesis techniques, specific dosages, formulations, or administration routes.

Example:
“The compound of claim 1, wherein the compound is administered orally.”


Scope and Novelty

The scope depends on claim language's breadth. Broad claims covering a chemical class or therapeutic method provide extensive protection but might face validity issues if similar prior art exists. Narrow claims reduce infringement risk but may be less commercially valuable.

The patent's claims appear to focus on a novel chemical scaffold with improved efficacy or safety profile, positioning it as a key innovation in its therapeutic segment.


Claim Validity Considerations

  • Novelty: The patent’s novelty relies on the absence of identical compounds or methods in prior art. Patent examiners would have examined prior publications, filings, and known compounds.
  • Inventive Step: The claims must demonstrate an inventive step, i.e., they are non-obvious over existing therapies or compounds.
  • Industrial Applicability: The claims substantiate a useful medical or manufacturing application, which is standard for pharmaceutical patents.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

1. Key Patent Families and Jurisdictions

The patent’s protection is within Israel but may have family counterparts in other jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, or PCT applications. A comprehensive landscape involves:

  • Family Members: Related patents filed internationally.
  • Competitor Patents: Similar compounds or methods from other entities.
  • Patent Thickets: Overlapping patents that create blocking or freedom-to-operate considerations.

2. Related Patents and Prior Art

A patent landscape analysis reveals prior art references that may include:

  • Existing drugs with similar structures or indications.
  • Earlier filings by the patent applicant or competitors describing similar compounds or uses.
  • Published scientific literature (e.g., journal articles, conference proceedings).

The presence of prior art with overlapping features impacts the patent’s enforceability and scope, possibly necessitating narrower claims.

3. Patent Strength and Weaknesses

  • Strengths:

    • Novel chemical structure with demonstrated therapeutic benefit.
    • Specific, well-defined claims with comprehensive dependent claims.
    • Possible inclusion of secondary claims covering formulations or methods of use.
  • Weaknesses:

    • Overly broad claims that may be challenged for lack of novelty or inventive step.
    • Prior art from related compounds or known therapeutic pathways.
    • Limited claims scope leading to potential workarounds.

Legal Status and Market Implication

The patent status—granted, pending, or challenged—directly impacts its market exclusivity. Assuming IL251759 is granted, the enforcement freedom depends on:

  • Clear, valid claims
  • Absence of prior art invalidating the patent
  • Effective prosecution and potential oppositions

The patent's protection period, typically 20 years from filing, grants exclusivity for the claimed invention, influencing market dynamics and R&D investments.


Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

  • For Innovators:
    Ensuring comprehensive claims and multifaceted patent families across jurisdictions to secure broad protection.

  • For Competitors:
    Conducting freedom-to-operate analyses considering IL251759 and related patents to avoid infringement or to design around claims.

  • For Patent Examiners:
    Rigorous examination to confirm novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, especially given the complex patent landscape in biotech.


Conclusion

Patent IL251759 embodies a strategic step in Israel’s pharmaceutical innovation landscape, likely covering a novel therapeutic compound or method. Its claims are designed to secure broad, enforceable protection, though they must be carefully balanced against prior art to maintain validity. The surrounding patent landscape is dynamic, with overlapping filings and potential freedom-to-operate considerations. Stakeholders must continuously monitor the patent’s legal status and related patents to inform licensing, R&D, and commercialization strategies effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • IL251759 claims a potentially novel compound or therapeutic method with a scope tailored to balance broad protection and validity.
  • The patent landscape around IL251759 features competitor filings, prior art considerations, and possible family patents in multiple jurisdictions.
  • Validity depends on overcoming prior art, with scope affected by claim language specificity.
  • The patent's strength influences market exclusivity, licensing opportunities, and strategic R&D planning.
  • Continuous monitoring of legal status and related patents is crucial for maintaining competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents like IL251759?
Pharmaceutical patents usually cover novel chemical compounds, specific use cases, formulations, or manufacturing processes. They aim to secure exclusive rights to the invention, preventing competitors from manufacturing or selling similar products.

2. How does prior art influence the validity of IL251759?
Prior art can invalidate claims if it discloses identical or obvious inventions. Patent examiners assess whether IL251759’s claims are sufficiently novel and inventive relative to existing literature and patents.

3. Are there common challenges associated with patenting new drugs in Israel?
Yes. Challenges include demonstrating novelty and inventive step, particularly as Israel’s patent system is aligned with international standards. Additionally, delays in prosecution or oppositions during examination can pose hurdles.

4. How important are patent claims’ breadth and specificity?
Striking the right balance is critical. Broad claims extend protection but risk being challenged for lack of novelty; specific claims are easier to defend but may allow competitors to design around them.

5. What strategies can stakeholders employ to maximize patent protection for their drugs?
Filing comprehensive patent families covering multiple jurisdictions, including narrow and broad claims, and continuously monitoring the patent landscape can optimize protection and market position.


Sources:

  1. Israel Patent Office. Official Patent Database.
  2. WIPO Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Patent documentation related to IL251759 (assumed public disclosures).
  4. Standard practices for pharmaceutical patent prosecution and litigation.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.