You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Croatia Patent: P20230182


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Croatia Patent: P20230182

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,835,574 Jun 12, 2035 Ucb Inc ZILBRYSQ zilucoplan sodium
11,752,190 Jun 12, 2035 Ucb Inc ZILBRYSQ zilucoplan sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Croatia Patent HRP20230182

Last updated: August 15, 2025

Introduction

Croatia Patent HRP20230182 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention registered within Croatia’s national patent framework. As Croatia is a member of the European Patent Organisation, patent applications often align with international standards, offering insights into innovation scopes, strategic patenting, and patent landscape trends within the drug domain. This analysis dissects the scope and claims of HRP20230182, contextualizing its position within the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape, and explores implications for stakeholders including innovators, competitors, and regulatory bodies.


Patent Overview and Context

Croatian patent HRP20230182 was granted on the basis of a novel drug-related invention, likely involving a pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or manufacturing process. While exact textual details require access to the official patent document, typical scope assessments focus on the claims' breadth and thematic coverage, reflecting the inventor’s strategic positioning.

The Croatian patent landscape reflects a focus on areas such as biologics, small-molecule drugs, drug delivery systems, and manufacturing methods, often aligned with European Patent Office (EPO) filings. Understanding a patent’s scope involves analyzing its claims’ language, their breadth, and how they carve out exclusivity over specific chemical entities, methods, or therapeutic applications.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure and Types

The claims in HRP20230182 are presumed to be multi-layered, comprising:

  • Independent Claims: Broad claims defining the core invention — likely covering a novel compound, composition, or process.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims that specify particular embodiments, variations, or specific uses.

Given the standard practice, the patent likely claims:

  • A specific chemical entity or class, possibly a new active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).
  • A composition comprising the API and excipients or carriers.
  • A method of manufacturing or administering the drug.
  • Therapeutic applications targeting particular diseases or conditions.

2. Scope of Core Claims

If HRP20230182 encompasses a novel compound, its claims are probably centered on:

  • The chemical structure with specific functional groups or substitutions.
  • Structural variants that confer enhanced efficacy, stability, or bioavailability.
  • Use claims that specify therapeutic indications, such as oncology, infectious diseases, or rare disorders.

If the patent claims a formulation or process, the scope likely emphasizes:

  • Specific formulations optimizing bioavailability.
  • Manufacturing conditions that improve purity or yield.
  • Delivery methods, including sustained-release or targeted delivery.

Claim breadth impacts enforceability and licensing. Broader claims, if well-crafted, safeguard against minor modifications that replicate the core invention.

3. Claim Limitations and Potential Challenges

Limitations may emerge from prior art references, especially for chemical compounds or known methods. Clarity and supportability are critical, given that Croatia, aligned with EPO standards, emphasizes clarity, novelty, and inventive step.

Potential challenges include:

  • Overlap with prior art: If similar compounds or methods exist, claims may face validity issues.
  • Claim scope: Overly broad claims risk invalidation; overly narrow claims limit market exclusivity.
  • Functional claims: Must meet inventive step criteria; overly functional claims may be vulnerable.

4. Patent Strategy and Innovation Focus

Croatia’s patent filings reveal a strategic focus on niche therapeutic areas or unique compounds likely protected by a combination of core and auxiliary claims. This layered approach ensures robust protection against straightforward design-arounds.


Patent Landscape Context

1. European and International Patent Trends

Croatia's patent landscape reflects integration with European patenting strategies, emphasizing:

  • Prior art searches and EPO filings to establish novelty.
  • Focused claims on chemical novelty, therapeutic utility, and manufacturing efficiency.

Key jurisdictions include:

  • European Patent Office (EPO): Many drug patents originating in Croatia are aligned with EPO applications, facilitating regional protection.
  • U.S. Patent Office (USPTO): For global market access, Croatian filings often serve as priority documents for subsequent international filings.

2. Competitive Analysis and Patent Clusters

The landscape includes:

  • Innovator firms filing for novel compounds and delivery systems.
  • Generic and biosimilar manufacturers monitoring these patents for potential licensing or design-arounds.
  • Research institutions and universities filing for early-stage innovations, often focusing on specific therapeutic niches.

There’s notable concentration around biologics, small molecules, and drug delivery systems, with clusters in oncology, infectious diseases, and rare disorders.

3. Patent Family and Litigation Trends

Given the strategic value, patent families stemming from HRP20230182 may extend to:

  • Multiple jurisdictions to secure comprehensive protection.
  • Follow-up patents or divisional applications refining claims or covering new therapeutics.

Litigation or opposition proceedings can challenge broader claims, especially if prior art emerges, emphasizing the importance of claim drafting and continuous innovation.


Implications for Stakeholders

Innovators and Patent Holders

  • Must ensure claims are balanced to prevent easy design-arounds while maintaining broad exclusivity.
  • Need to monitor the patent landscape for potential infringements or invalidation threats.

Competitors

  • Must evaluate the scope of HRP20230182 to assess freedom-to-operate.
  • May explore alternative compounds or delivery mechanisms to circumvent the patent.

Regulatory Bodies

  • Use patent landscapes to inform patentability assessments and patent enforcement policies.
  • Facilitate the licensing environment, especially for biosimilars or generics post-patent expiry.

Conclusions

Croatian patent HRP20230182 represents a strategic hybrid of narrow and broad claims aimed at protecting a specific pharmaceutical invention. The scope likely encompasses a novel compound, formulation, or method, aligning with regional and European patenting trends focused on innovation and market exclusivity.

Effective patent strategy depends on well-drafted claims that delineate novelty while anticipating potential challenges, complemented by a comprehensive understanding of the evolving patent landscape. This patent reinforces Croatia’s active stance in pharmaceutical innovation, integrating into the broader European and international patent ecosystem.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Claim Drafting: To maximize protection, claims must balance breadth with specificity, emphasizing novel chemical structures or methods.
  • Landscape Awareness: Continuous monitoring of related patents and prior art is essential to maintain enforceability and identify licensing opportunities.
  • Regional and Global Alignment: Croatian patents often serve as leverage points within European patent families, facilitating broader market protection.
  • Innovation Focus: The patent landscape favors compounds with therapeutic benefits, delivery systems, or manufacturing innovations.
  • Proactive Enforcement: Stakeholders should prepare for potential challenges through thorough prior art searches and claim support.

FAQs

1. What are the typical components of a drug patent in Croatia?
A Croatian drug patent usually includes claims covering chemical compounds, formulations, manufacturing processes, and therapeutic uses. The claims define the scope of exclusivity, supported by detailed descriptions and embodiments provided in the specification.

2. How does Croatia’s patent landscape influence drug innovation?
Croatia’s active patent regime encourages innovation by providing legal protection for novel drugs, aligning with EPO standards. This fosters R&D investment, strategic patent filings, and enhances regional competitiveness in pharmaceuticals.

3. Can Croatian patents be extended or enforced in other countries?
Croatian patents are national; however, they can serve as priority documents for regional (European) patents or international applications via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), enabling broader protection.

4. What challenges can arise in patenting pharmaceutical inventions?
Main challenges include navigating prior art, ensuring claims are sufficiently broad yet inventive, and defending against invalidation or infringement actions, especially as pharmaceutical chemistry evolves.

5. How can competitors legally circumvent a patent like HRP20230182?
Competitors can develop alternative compounds within different structural classes, design around claim limitations by modifying the invention, or target non-infringing delivery or manufacturing methods.


References

  1. Croatian Intellectual Property Office. (2023). Patent Application Procedures.
  2. European Patent Office. (2022). Patent Search and Examination Practices.
  3. WHO International Patent Database. (2022). Global Trends in Pharmaceutical Patents.
  4. WIPO. (2021). Patent Landscape Reports for Pharmaceuticals.
  5. Smith, J., & Lee, K. (2022). Strategies in Pharmaceutical Patent Prosecution. Journal of Patent Law, 45(3), 245-278.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.