You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Croatia Patent: P20221113


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Croatia Patent: P20221113

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 17, 2036 Mycovia Pharms VIVJOA oteseconazole
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 17, 2036 Mycovia Pharms VIVJOA oteseconazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Croatia Drug Patent HRP20221113

Last updated: August 9, 2025

Introduction

Croatia Patent HRP20221113 represents a critical component within the intellectual property landscape concerning pharmaceutical innovations in Croatia and potentially the broader European market. The patent’s scope, claims, and positioning within the existing patent landscape influence the strategic development, commercialization, and competitive advantage of the underlying drug. This analysis explores the patent’s scope, claims specificity, its uniqueness, and its interaction within the global and regional patent environment.

Background and Patent Overview

The Croatian Patent HRP20221113 was filed under the Croatian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO) and subsequently published under the international framework, likely under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or directly via regional filings, depending on its origin. Although specific filing details are not provided here, the patent’s title indicates its association with a drug or medicinal compound, possibly with innovative formulation, method of use, or manufacturing process.

Croatia’s patent law aligns largely with European standards, emphasizing novel, inventive, and industrially applicable characteristics of pharmaceutical inventions. The patent grants exclusive rights typically lasting 20 years from the filing date, incentivizing innovation disclosures and market exclusivity.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Scope of the Patent

The scope of HRP20221113 critically determines the patent’s breadth and enforceability. Broad claims safeguard a wider array of variants but risk invalidity if too encompassing. Narrow claims limit protection but improve validity chances. The scope hinges on:

  • Type of Claims: The patent likely includes a mixture of product claims (covering the active pharmaceutical ingredient [API] or formulations), process claims (methods of synthesis or preparation), and use claims (indications or treatment methods).
  • Claim Language: Precise and unambiguous language heightens enforceability; overly broad or vague claims jeopardize validity.
  • Innovative Features: Novel structural features, improved bioavailability, or superior stability are typical claimed features.

Claims Structure and Specificity

Assuming standard pharmaceutical patent practices, claims may include:

  • Independent Claims: Cover the core innovation—potentially the API compound with a novel chemical structure or unique formulation.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow the scope by adding specific features or embodiments, such as particular dosages, combinations, or delivery mechanisms.

For example, a hypothetical independent claim might state:

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising [API] characterized by [unique chemical modification], configured for the treatment of [specific condition]."

Dependent claims could specify:

"The composition according to claim 1, wherein the API is present in an amount of [specific dosage]."

The granularity and specificity of claims affect enforceability, and overly broad claims may be challenged under patent scrutiny, especially for lack of inventive step or novelty.

Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent’s validity depends on demonstrating novelty over prior art, including existing patents, scientific publications, or public disclosures. Common prior art challenges focus on:

  • Similar chemical structures or formulations.
  • Existing methods of treatment for the targeted condition.
  • Known manufacturing processes.

In Croatia, the patent office verifies inventive step via technical problem-solution approaches, ensuring the claimed invention offers an unexpected technical advantage over prior art.

Patentable Subject Matter Considerations

European and Croatian law exclude certain subject matters, such as:

  • Pure discoveries of natural substances.
  • Methods of treatment that are considered medical procedures unless integrated into patentable formulations or devices.

Thus, the patent likely claims palatable claims related to specific formulation innovations or methods that differ markedly from known techniques.

Patent Landscape Context

Regional and International Patent Environment

Croatia's patent landscape reflects a broader European pharmaceutical patent environment, harmonized through the European Patent Convention (EPC) and the European Patent Office (EPO). Post-EU accession, Croatia aligns its patent regulations with EU directives, fostering a predictable environment for drug patents.

  • European Patent Applications: The same or similar inventions may also be protected via European patents, influencing patent validity and enforceability within Croatia.
  • National vs. Regional Patents: A national patent provides rights solely within Croatia, while a European patent extends protection across multiple member states upon validation, broadening market exclusivity.

Competitive Landscape

Pharmaceutical companies and biotech firms actively seek patent protection for novel compounds, formulations, and methods, leading to crowded patent landscapes featuring:

  • Overlapping compound patents.
  • Formulation patents with narrow claims.
  • Secondary patents on specific aspects such as delivery devices.

Protection gaps or weak claims may invite challenges, prompting patentees to secure broad or secondary patents.

Legal and Policy Environment

Croatia's adherence to EU regulations, including data exclusivity and patent linkage, influences generic entry and patent enforcement. Patent disputes typically focus on claim validity, patent scope, or infringement, involving courts or administrative bodies.

Enforcement and Commercial Implications

Strong, defensible claims ensure market exclusivity and can prevent generic or biosimilar entries for their duration. Conversely, narrow or vulnerable claims pose risks, especially if prior art or obviousness challenges arise.

The patent’s enforceability will depend on:

  • Robustness of claim language.
  • Court adjudications on validity.
  • Market strategy and patent expiry timing.

Conclusion

Croatia Patent HRP20221113, on the basis of its likely scope and claims, appears to encompass specific formulations or methods associated with a pharmaceutical innovation. Its strength hinges on claim specificity, novelty, and inventive step over prior art. The patent landscape in Croatia and broader Europe offers opportunities for strategic patent densification and market exclusivity but requires vigilance against potential challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope is critically defined by claim language—precise and well-supported claims enhance enforceability.
  • Broad claims provide stronger market protection but are more vulnerable to invalidity challenges; narrow claims may invite workarounds.
  • The patent landscape in Croatia is aligned with EU standards, emphasizing novelty and inventive step, with regional and national protections complementing each other.
  • Strong patent positioning requires ongoing monitoring of prior art and patent filings to defend against infringements and invalidation.
  • Strategic patent portfolio management, including secondary and process claims, enhances overall drug protection and commercial competitiveness.

FAQs

1. How does Croatia’s patent system impact pharmaceutical patent protections?
Croatia’s patent system, aligned with EU standards, emphasizes novelty and inventive step, providing robust protection for pharmaceutical innovations within its jurisdiction. It also allows for regional protection through European patents, expanding market exclusivity.

2. What are common challenges in patenting pharmaceutical compounds in Croatia?
Challenges include demonstrating inventive step against existing prior art, avoiding overbroad claims that may be invalidated, and ensuring claims are sufficiently specific to withstand legal scrutiny.

3. Can a Croatian patent protect a drug formulation developed in another country?
Yes, if the formulation is novel and inventive under Croatian law, it can be patentable regardless of its origin elsewhere. However, prior art from other jurisdictions may influence patent validity.

4. How important are claim dependencies in pharmaceutical patents?
Claim dependencies narrow the scope and provide fallback positions if broader claims are invalidated, offering strategic protection and enforcement advantages.

5. What role does patent landscape analysis play in drug development?
It helps identify freedom-to-operate, avoid infringement, and uncover opportunities for patenting novel aspects, thereby informing strategic R&D and commercialization plans.


References:

[1] Croatian Intellectual Property Office. "Guidelines on patent application procedure."
[2] European Patent Office. "Guidelines for Examination in the EPO."
[3] EU Directive 2004/48/EC on Enforcement of IP Rights.
[4] Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Publications.
[5] Croatian Patent Law.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.