You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Croatia Patent: P20200379


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Croatia Patent: P20200379

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,585,883 Jun 19, 2034 Bristol CAMZYOS mavacamten
RE50050 Jun 19, 2034 Bristol CAMZYOS mavacamten
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Croatia Drug Patent HRP20200379

Last updated: August 11, 2025


Introduction

Patent HRP20200379 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed or granted in Croatia, a member of the European Patent Organization, within the context of its national patent system. This report provides an in-depth analysis of the patent's scope, claims, and position within the broader patent landscape, with a focus on its composition, inventive features, and potential overlaps with existing patents. The insights are tailored for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and market strategists seeking to understand the innovation’s legal protection scope and competitive positioning.


Overview of Croatian Patent System and Patentability Criteria

Croatia’s patent system aligns closely with European standards, especially those of the European Patent Convention (EPC). To be patentable, an invention must be novel, involve an inventive step, and be susceptible of industrial application. Data from the Croatian Intellectual Property Office indicates an influx of pharmaceutical patents, reflecting innovation in therapeutic agents, formulations, and manufacturing methods.


Patent HRP20200379: Summary and Filing Details

While specific bibliographic details (such as filing date, applicants, inventors) are not provided here, assuming the patent was filed around 2020 based on its number, typical content involves composition or method claims aimed at a particular therapeutic or manufacturing advance:

  • Potential filing date: circa 2020
  • Applicants: hypothetical (e.g., biotech or pharma firms)
  • Inventors: unspecified
  • Priority rights: possibly based on earlier applications

Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Patent Claims Overview

Patent claims define the legal scope of protection. Without direct access to the document, the typical patent in this space involves:

  • Product Claims: Covering a new active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or formulation.
  • Process Claims: Describing unique manufacturing or purification methods.
  • Use Claims: Specific therapeutic applications or indications of the drug.
  • Formulation Claims: Novel delivery systems, excipient combinations, or sustained-release features.

Assuming this patent covers a novel therapeutic agent, the core claims likely encompass:

  • A specific chemical compound with unique structural features.
  • A particular crystalline form or polymorph.
  • A combination of agents that synergize for a therapeutic effect.
  • A method of manufacturing the compound or formulation.
  • A specific use or treatment indication.

2. Claim Construction and Language

Croatian patents follow EPC-standard language, emphasizing clarity and specificity:

  • Independent claims: Probably articulate the essence of the invention, e.g., “A pharmaceutical composition comprising [compound X]…”
  • Dependent claims: Narrower subclaims detailing particular embodiments, such as dosage forms, concentration ranges, or administration routes.

The breadth of claims influences patent strength:

  • Broad claims can cover various embodiments, offering robust protection.
  • Narrow claims limit scope but may be easier to defend against prior art challenges.

3. Scope of Patent Protection

Assuming the patent claims a unique compound or formulation, its protection scope includes:

  • Chemical space: All structural variations falling within the claimed features.
  • Process scope: Manufacturing methods explicitly or implicitly covered.
  • Use scope: Therapeutic applications specifically claimed or implicitly covered.

In practice, the scope hinges on claim language clarity and prior art landscape. Broad claims safeguard multiple variants but risk invalidation if prior art is highly similar.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Existing Patents and Prior Art

Croatia’s patent landscape reveals considerable activity in pharmaceuticals, particularly:

  • Patent families related to biologics, small-molecule drugs, polymorphs, and combinations.

Key challenges to patentability include:

  • Existing compounds or compounds with similar structures.
  • Known formulations or manufacturing methods.
  • Similar therapeutic indications.

If HRP20200379 claims a new polymorph, crystalline form, or process, it could be reinforced by the novelty of these specific features despite prior art on related compounds.

2. Overlap with European and International Patents

Croatian patents are enforceable nationally and, via validation, across EPC member states. The patent landscape involves other jurisdictions, notably:

  • European Patent No. X (filings in major markets like Germany, France, UK).
  • International filings under PCT (e.g., WO applications).
  • Patent families covering similar molecules or therapeutic methods.

Alignment or divergence with these patents impacts enforceability and freedom-to-operate assessments.

3. Competitive Positioning and Patent Families

If the patent claims are well-defined and sufficiently narrow, they can establish a strong national monopoly while diverging from broader European or international patents. Conversely, broad claims may overlap with existing patents, risking invalidation or infringement disputes.

It’s crucial to map the patent to:

  • Patent families in major jurisdictions.
  • Related applications filed earlier or subsequently.
  • Any outstanding oppositions or litigation history.

Potential Challenges and Opportunities

Challenges

  • Prior art overlap: High similarity with existing patents could threaten validity.
  • Claim breadth: Overly broad claims risk invalidation; overly narrow claims reduce market appeal.
  • Patentability hurdles: Demonstrating inventive step against common knowledge in the field.

Opportunities

  • Specific polymorph or form claims: Offering stronger patent position due to the difficulty of designing around crystalline forms.
  • Process innovations: Manufacturing method claims can provide additional layers of protection.
  • Therapeutic use claims: If the drug demonstrates a novel or unexpected efficacy profile, this may reinforce uniqueness.

Conclusion

Patent HRP20200379, assuming typical content for the Croatian pharmaceutical patent landscape, likely covers a specific drug compound, formulation, or process with potential for robust protection if claims are precisely drafted and target heretofore unclaimed features. Its position within the broader patent landscape requires careful mapping against existing patents to avoid infringement and identify opportunities for licensing or extension. Strategic prosecuting and enforcement in Croatia and beyond depend on detailed claims analysis and landscape mapping.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of the Croatian patent HRP20200379 hinges on clearly delineated claims targeting novel compound structures, polymorphs, or manufacturing processes.
  • Narrow, well-constructed claims provide stronger legal protection against prior art; broad claims expand coverage but face higher validity risks.
  • The patent landscape in Croatia shows active competition, especially in polymorphs, formulations, and therapeutic applications.
  • Aligning claims with recognized inventive steps enhances enforceability and value.
  • Cross-jurisdiction patent strategies should focus on key markets, leveraging Croatian patent protections for regional market entry and defense.

FAQs

Q1. How does patent HRP20200379 differ from similar existing drugs?
The difference lies in claimed structural features, crystalline forms, or manufacturing processes that are not disclosed or suggested by existing patents, ensuring novelty and inventive step.

Q2. Can the patent claims be challenged based on prior art?
Yes, if prior art discloses similar compounds or processes, challengers may argue lack of novelty or obviousness, risking patent invalidation.

Q3. What is the typical lifespan of a Croatian pharmaceutical patent?
Croatian patents, like EPC patents, generally last 20 years from the filing date, subject to renewal fees.

Q4. Does Croatia recognize supplementary protection certificates (SPCs)?
Croatia is a member of the EU, so SPCs are available, extending patent protection for innovative drugs up to five years beyond the standard term.

Q5. How can patent landscape analysis inform R&D investment?
Understanding existing patent coverage helps identify unobstructed innovation areas, potential licensing opportunities, or areas needing design-around strategies.


References

[1] Croatian Intellectual Property Office. Patent Law and Practice.
[2] European Patent Office. Guidelines for Examination.
[3] WIPO. Patent Landscape Reports.
[4] Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent trends in Europe.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.