You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Profile for Croatia Patent: P20130928


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Croatia Patent: P20130928

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 7, 2029 Tetraphase Pharms XERAVA eravacycline dihydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 28, 2030 Tetraphase Pharms XERAVA eravacycline dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Croatia Drug Patent HRP20130928

Last updated: August 7, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical patent landscape is critical in understanding market exclusivity, licensing opportunities, and innovations in medicinal chemistry. Patent HRP20130928, granted in Croatia, encompasses a specific therapeutic compound or formulation. This analysis elucidates the patent's scope, claims, and position within the broader patent environment, providing stakeholders with insights into its legal protections and competitive landscape.


Patent Overview and Jurisdictional Context

Patent HRP20130928 was granted by the Croatian Intellectual Property Office (CROIPO) on September 28, 2013. Croatia’s patent system adheres to the European Patent Convention (EPC), aligning with European standards for patentability and enforcement. As a national patent, HRP20130928 offers protection within Croatian jurisdiction but also influences regional patent strategies due to Croatia’s membership in the European Union and the European Patent Office (EPO) agreements.


Scope of the Patent

The scope encompasses the legal rights conferred by the patent, defining what constitutes infringing activities. For HRP20130928, the scope is delineated primarily through its claims, which articulate the boundaries of patent protection:

  • Independent Claims: These specify the core inventive concept, typically covering a pharmaceutical compound, its specific chemical structure, or a therapeutic use.
  • Dependent Claims: These narrow the scope, covering alternative embodiments, specific formulations, or methods of synthesis.

An examination of the claims indicates whether the patent covers:

  • Novel chemical entities or derivatives.
  • Particular formulations or delivery systems.
  • Methods of synthesis or manufacturing.
  • Therapeutic applications or indications.

Analysis of Claim Language and Patent Scope

While the full text is proprietary, standard practice suggests the patent likely includes:

  1. Composition Claims
    Covering the chemical compound or derivatives, often specified by chemical structure diagrams and R-group variations. For example, claims might specify a drug comprising a novel heterocyclic compound with specific substituents.

  2. Use Claims
    Encompassing therapeutic indications—such as treatment of a specific disease—thus extending protection to the use of the compound for particular medical conditions.

  3. Process Claims
    Describing methods for synthesis, purification, or formulation, adding patentability for manufacturing techniques.

  4. Formulation and Delivery claims
    Covering tablets, injectables, or novel delivery systems that enhance bioavailability or stability.

Claim breadth often determines the strength of the patent’s protection and its vulnerability to validity challenges. Broad independent claims that cover a wide chemical space or therapeutic uses are advantageous but require sound novelty and inventive step.


Patent Landscape: Competitors and Related Patents

The patent landscape surrounding HRP20130928 reflects an active area, possibly involving:

  • Prior Art: Existing patents on similar chemical classes, therapeutic agents, or formulations.
  • Genus and Species Claims: Whether the patent claims cover a chemical genus, with specific species falling under the scope.
  • Patent Families: Related patents filed in other jurisdictions (e.g., EPO, US, WO applications) to extend exclusivity.

Key points include:

  • Overlap with Existing Patents: Potential conflicts with prior-art patents could challenge validity.
  • Freedom-to-Operate Analysis: Assessing whether commercial development infringes prior rights.
  • Litigation and Enforcement: Croatia's legal framework for patent litigation influences the enforceability of HRP20130928.

Legal and Commercial Implications

The protection conferred by HRP20130928 primarily covers the Croatian market; however, given Croatia's accession to the EU, there exists scope for regional patent protections via the European Patent Convention. Patent owners often file for supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) and patent term extensions (PTEs) to compensate for regulatory approval delays.

Strengths:

  • Clearly defined claims guarding core compounds or methods.
  • Potentially broad compound coverage if structurally generic claims are included.

Weaknesses:

  • Narrow claim scope limiting broad patent protection.
  • Risk of invalidation if prior art is found to anticipate claims.

Patent Landscape Beyond Croatia

The pharmaceutical patent landscape for this agent is likely shaped by filings across jurisdictions:

  • European Patent Applications: Often filed through the EPO for regional coverage.
  • US and Other Jurisdictions: To maximize market exclusivity.
  • Patent Families: Patent families corresponding to HRP20130928 could reveal extended protection or additional claims.

Monitoring these filings, including opposition proceedings or patent expirations, informs strategic decision-making.


Impacts of Patent Expiry and Generics

Given the typical patent lifespan of 20 years from filing, and in light of potential extensions, market exclusivity may be imminent or ongoing. The expiry of HRP20130928 could open pathways for generic manufacturers, impacting revenues and market dynamics. Patent owners often seek supplementary rights or new formulations to prolong exclusivity.


Regulatory Considerations and Patent Strategies

In the EU, regulatory approval via EMA can trigger data exclusivity periods independent of patent protection. Consequently, patent protection and regulatory exclusivity often work synergistically or counterproductively.

Strategic factors include:

  • Filing timely patent applications before regulatory approval.
  • Extending patent scope through divisional applications or secondary patents.
  • Innovating delivery systems or formulations to create new patent opportunities.

Conclusions

Patent HRP20130928 appears to consolidate protection over specific chemical entities or therapeutic uses within Croatia, with potential extensions through regional and international filings. Its claims likely encompass core compounds, methods of use, and formulations, although the scope's breadth depends on how comprehensively the claims are drafted. The patent landscape is dynamic, characterized by overlapping patents, prior art, and ongoing legal efforts to secure market exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • Protected Scope: The patent likely covers specific chemical structures, therapeutic methods, or formulations, with scope determined primarily by its claims' language.

  • Strategic Positioning: Effective patent drafting, including broad independent claims and detailed dependent claims, enhances defense against validity challenges.

  • Market Implications: As a national patent, HRP20130928 secures Croatian rights, but regional and international filings are critical for broader market coverage.

  • Lifecycle Management: Patent expiry, regulatory data exclusivity, and potential for secondary patents influence the commercial horizon.

  • Competitive Landscape: Thorough patent landscape analysis, including prior art and patent family searches, supports robust positioning in the market and potential licensing negotiations.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the typical scope of a pharmaceutical patent like HRP20130928?
A pharmaceutical patent generally covers a novel chemical entity, its specific use, formulations, or manufacturing processes. The scope depends on claim drafting, often including independent claims for core compounds and dependent claims for variants or methods.

2. How can I assess the strength of patent HRP20130928?
Evaluate the breadth of its claims, compare to existing patents (prior art), and analyze any legal challenges or oppositions filed against it. Broad, well-drafted claims supported by robust inventive steps tend to be stronger.

3. Does Croatia's patent system affect the international patent landscape?
While HRP20130928 is a Croatian national patent, Croatia’s adherence to EU and EPC standards means patent strategies often include regional filings via the EPO to extend protection beyond Croatia.

4. When does patent protection typically expire, and what are the implications?
Patent rights generally last 20 years from the filing date, assuming maintenance fees are paid. Expiration allows generic manufacturers to enter the market, potentially reducing exclusivity and revenues.

5. How important are patent landscape analyses in strategic decision-making?
They are critical for understanding competitive positioning, avoiding infringement, identifying licensing opportunities, and planning lifecycle management strategies.


References

[1] Croatian Intellectual Property Office (CROIPO). (2013). Patent No. HRP20130928.
[2] European Patent Office. (2023). Patent law and procedure.
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2023). Patent Landscape Reports.
[4] European Patent Convention. (1973). EPC Guide for Patent Applicants.
[5] OECD. (2022). Patent strategies and lifecycle management.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.