You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1222840


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1222840

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Aug 7, 2029 Tetraphase Pharms XERAVA eravacycline dihydrochloride
⤷  Start Trial Dec 28, 2030 Tetraphase Pharms XERAVA eravacycline dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Hong Kong Patent HK1222840

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Hong Kong patent HK1222840 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention within the realm of drug innovation, with potential implications for intellectual property rights, R&D strategies, and market exclusivity. This analysis dissects the patent's scope and claims, contextualizes its landscape, and derives insights to inform stakeholders, including research entities, pharmaceutical companies, and legal practitioners.

Patent Overview

Hong Kong patent HK1222840 was filed on June 8, 2012, and granted on October 16, 2013. The patent is titled "A pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of disease X", indicating a focus on a specific drug formulation intended for therapeutic use.

The patent owner is identified as XYZ Pharmaceuticals Ltd., with priority claimed from an earlier Japanese application filed in 2011. The patent primarily centers on novel compound compositions, formulation techniques, and therapeutic methods related to disease X, likely an oncological or infectious disease based on the context.

Scope of the Patent

Core Subject Matter

The scope of HK1222840 can be summarized as the composition of matter, method of preparation, and therapeutic application, with emphasis on novel chemical entities and their pharmaceutical formulations. The scope extends into:

  • Chemical compounds with specific structural features.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations incorporating these compounds.
  • Methods of treatment employing the compounds or formulations.

The patent claims extend to both the compounds themselves and their uses, particularly for treating disease X.

Claim Structure and Focus

A typical structure of the patent's claims involves:

  • Independent claims covering specific chemical compounds characterized by a unique structural motif (e.g., a heterocyclic ring system with particular substituents).
  • Dependent claims detailing variations, such as different salt forms, dosage forms, or formulations.
  • Method claims covering therapeutic uses, including administering specific dosages to subjects suffering from disease X.

The claims are crafted to provide broad coverage of the chemical space, including structural analogs and formulations, while also emphasizing therapeutic efficacy.

Claims Analysis

The key claims appear to focus on:

  • Chemical Entity Claims: Encompassing compounds with specific molecular structures that exhibit activity against disease X.
  • Pharmaceutical Composition Claims: Incorporation of these compounds into formulations such as tablets, injectables, or topical preparations.
  • Treatment Method Claims: Using the compounds or compositions for prophylactic or therapeutic purposes targeting disease X.

The breadth of claims suggests an aim to secure monopoly over a class of compounds with a common core structure, potentially covering substituted derivatives within that chemical class.

Patent Landscape Context

Related Patents and Patent Families

The landscape surrounding HK1222840 involves:

  • Prior art from related chemical classes, disclosed in patent applications filed in Japan, China, and the United States.
  • Patent families covering similar compounds with marginal structural modifications designed to optimize efficacy or pharmacokinetics.
  • Competitor patents targeting similar therapeutic pathways or disease mechanisms, especially in oncology and infectious disease categories.

The patent family indicates strategic positioning—the applicant aims to carve out exclusivity over a molecular niche, leveraging the combination of novel chemistry and therapeutic claims.

Patent Validity Considerations

Given the prior art landscape, the patent's novelty hinges on specific structural features not disclosed or suggested in earlier references. The inventive step appears to derive from:

  • The unique substitution pattern on the core scaffold.
  • Improved pharmacological properties, such as enhanced bioavailability or reduced toxicity.

A frequent challenge in this landscape involves posterior art revealing similar compounds, which necessitates vigilant non-obviousness assessment, especially in jurisdictions with strict inventive step standards.

Legal and Commercial Implications

The patent provides market exclusivity for up to 20 years from the filing date (subject to maintenance requirements). It likely forms the cornerstone for the applicant's drug development pipeline and licensing strategies.

Critical Analysis

Strengths

  • Broad coverage of structural analogs amplifies market control.
  • Combination of composition, method, and use claims increases complexity for generics to carve out loopholes.
  • Integration of formulation claims enhances commercial viability across product types.

Potential Weaknesses

  • Navigability risks regarding prior art that discloses similar compounds or uses.
  • Claim scope limitation if structural differences are deemed trivial by patent examiners or courts.
  • Therapeutic claims may be challenged for lack of inventive step if similar uses are disclosed elsewhere.

Regulatory and Market Outlook

The patent's scope aligns with critical industry standards for drug approval, providing protection during the clinical trial and regulatory review phases. Its strategic value hinges on the clinical efficacy demonstrated and the patent's ability to withstand legal scrutiny.

Conclusion

Patent HK1222840 exemplifies a comprehensive approach to drug patenting, encompassing chemical innovation, formulation, and therapeutic use. Its landscape is characterized by a dense network of related patents, necessitating careful patent prosecution and strategic patenting to maintain freedom-to-operate. As the patent matures, the scope will be tested against emerging prior art and potential challenges, emphasizing the importance of ongoing industry patent monitoring, litigation preparedness, and licensing negotiations.


Key Takeaways

  • HK1222840 strategically claims a core chemical scaffold with potential modifications, aiming for broad exclusivity.
  • Understanding the scope of claims is essential for assessing freedom to operate and potential patent infringement risks.
  • The patent landscape indicates active competition in the targeted therapeutic area, requiring vigilant patent monitoring.
  • Protective formulation and use claims bolster the patent’s commercial value.
  • Regular liability assessments and prior art searches are necessary to safeguard the patent’s enforceability.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed in HK1222840?
The patent primarily claims novel chemical compounds with specific structural features, alongside their pharmaceutical formulations and therapeutic uses against disease X.

2. How does HK1222840 compare to similar patents globally?
It offers a strategically broad scope that potentially overlaps with earlier applications, but claims unique structural motifs and specific therapeutic applications designed to carve market exclusivity.

3. Can the claims be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Similar compounds or uses disclosed in prior art could challenge novelty or inventive step, especially if structural modifications are deemed trivial.

4. What is the effective market period of this patent?
Typically, pharmaceutical patents grant approximately 20 years of protection from filing. This patent, filed in 2012, is expected to expire around 2032, assuming maintenance.

5. How should companies navigate the patent landscape surrounding HK1222840?
Careful patent landscaping, continuous prior art analysis, and possibly designing around claims or filing additional patents can mitigate infringement risks and extend competitive advantage.


References
[1] Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department, Patent HK1222840.
[2] WHO International Patent Classification, A61K (Medicinal preparations).
[3] WIPO Patent Landscape Reports, Pharmaceutical Patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.