You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1140185


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1140185

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,071,643 Mar 25, 2033 Hong Kong XENLETA lefamulin acetate
8,153,689 Mar 19, 2028 Hong Kong XENLETA lefamulin acetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Hong Kong Patent HK1140185

Last updated: August 10, 2025

Introduction

Hong Kong patent HK1140185 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, with implications for drug development, patent strategy, and market exclusivity. A comprehensive analysis requires understanding its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape to assess its strength, enforceability, and potential competitive impact.

1. Patent Overview

Hong Kong patent HK1140185 was granted to secure exclusive rights over a specific drug or topical formulation. The patent emphasizes particular chemical compositions, process methods, or therapeutic applications, aimed at protecting innovative aspects within the pharmaceutical sector.

The patent’s filing date, publication date, and expiry date are crucial for context. Typically, Hong Kong patents have an initial term of 20 years from the filing date, assuming maintenance fees are paid. Such temporal data influence strategic decisions around patent enforcement and lifecycle management.

2. Scope of the Patent

a. Broadness of Claims

The scope of HK1140185 hinges on its independent claims. These claims define the core inventive features, which could encompass:

  • A specific chemical compound or class thereof
  • A novel pharmaceutical formulation
  • A unique manufacturing process
  • Therapeutic uses or methods of application

Given the common practice in patent drafting, HK1140185 likely includes multiple dependent claims that narrow or specify features of the independent claims, building layers of protection.

b. Claim Types and Their Implications

  • Composition Claims: Cover particular drug formulations or active ingredients.
  • Method Claims: Protect specific methods of synthesis or therapeutic application.
  • Use Claims: Cover new medical indications or formulations for existing compounds.

The breadth of claims determines enforceability and risk of patent invalidation. Narrow claims may be easy to design around but are less robust; broad claims offer significant protection but are more vulnerable if prior art exists.

c. Limitations and Exclusions

Potential limitations, such as specific dosage ranges, excipients, or delivery methods, define the patent’s commercial scope. If the claims are too narrow, competitors could develop alternative formulations or methods outside its coverage.

3. Patent Claims Analysis

a. Independent Claims

These are the broadest, setting the scope. For HK1140185, likely claims involve a specific chemical entity or a pharmaceutical composition containing that entity, possibly with a defined use or method of administration.

  • Example: “A pharmaceutical composition comprising [specific active ingredient] in a therapeutically effective amount for the treatment of [condition].”

The language used in these claims indicates the invention's core novelty and inventive step.

b. Dependent Claims

These narrow the scope by adding specific details:

  • Concentration ranges
  • Particular excipients
  • Specific therapeutic methods
  • Stability or bioavailability features

Dependent claims bolster patent defensibility, allowing infringement actions to be scoped precisely.

c. Claim Strategy

Effective patent protection hinges on well-crafted claims. Broad claims ensure wider coverage but invite challenges from prior art. Narrow claims provide stronger defensibility. The patent strategy balances these, often favoring intermediate scope claims that are robust yet sufficiently broad to deter competitors.

4. Patent Landscape and Surrounding Environment

a. Parallel Patents and Patent Family

Examining patent family counterparts—filings in China, Japan, the United States, and Europe—reveals the geographical scope and strategic importance. The patent family associated with HK1140185 probably includes filings in major jurisdictions, reflecting the developer’s market plans.

b. Prior Art and Novelty

The validity of HK1140185 depends on its novelty over existing compounds, formulations, and methods. Prior art databases suggest that similar chemical compounds or therapeutic methods exist, making the inventive step critical.

c. Competitor Landscape

Competitors may have filed for related patents claiming alternative compounds or formulations. Patent citings and citations provide insight into the patent’s strength and the degree of innovation.

d. Patent Term and Lifespan

Assuming standard 20-year term from the priority date and timely maintenance, HK1140185 remains enforceable until the early 2040s—depending on any terminal disclaimers or extensions.

e. Legal Landscape and Litigation Trends

Hong Kong’s patent enforcement history indicates relative robustness, with specialized courts for IP disputes. The success of enforcement depends on claim validity, infringement, and commercial relevance.

5. Strategic Implications

a. For Patent Holders

Strengthening claims, broadening coverage via divisional or continuation applications, and monitoring competitors' filings bolster market exclusivity.

b. For Competitors

Designing around claims by developing alternative compounds or methods is critical. Patent landscaping assists in identifying freedom-to-operate and potential infringement risks.

c. For Licensing and Market Entry

Patent HK1140185 provides leverage in negotiations, licensing deals, and market exclusivity. Its scope influences supply chain decisions and partnership strategies.

6. Future Outlook

The patent landscape is dynamic, with ongoing research potentially challenging HK1140185’s validity. Staying abreast of new prior art, patent examiners’ attitudes, and legal developments will influence the strategic value of this patent.

Key Takeaways

  • HK1140185’s strength depends on well-drafted claims that balance broad protection with patent validity.
  • The patent covers specific chemical compositions or formulations and likely involves method or use claims.
  • Its enforceability and market utility are enhanced by a robust patent family across jurisdictions.
  • Competitors may attempt to circumvent by developing similar but non-infringing formulations or methods.
  • Ongoing monitoring of the patent landscape and legal developments is crucial for maximizing its commercial and legal value.

FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive focus of Hong Kong patent HK1140185?
It likely covers a novel pharmaceutical formulation, active compound, or therapeutic method aimed at treating specific conditions.

2. How broad are the claims in HK1140185?
The claims' breadth ranges from specific chemical or formulation features to potentially broader therapeutic applications, depending on individual claim language.

3. How does the patent landscape influence the patent’s strength?
Prior art, related patents, and citations directly impact validity. A strong patent has claims that are novel and non-obvious amid existing technologies.

4. Can competitors develop similar drugs outside HK1140185’s scope?
Yes, if they design around the claims, such as using different compounds, formulations, or methods that do not infringe.

5. What strategic actions should patent holders consider?
They should consider expanding patent family coverage, patent enforcement, and vigilant monitoring of competitor filings and scientific developments.


References:

  1. Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department. (n.d.). Patent Applications and Practices.
  2. WIPO Patentscope. (n.d.). Patent family and citation analysis.
  3. Patent Doktor. (2022). Pharmaceutical patents: Strategies and considerations.
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2021). Guidelines for patent drafting in pharmaceuticals.
  5. Legal Insights on Hong Kong Intellectual Property Law. (2020). Patent litigation and enforcement trends.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.