You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Guatemala Patent: 201600142


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Guatemala Patent: 201600142

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,183,020 Jan 2, 2035 Astrazeneca TAGRISSO osimertinib mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Guatemala Drug Patent GT201600142

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Patent GT201600142, granted in Guatemala, encompasses a pharmaceutical invention aimed at addressing specific medical conditions with a novel or improved formulation, process, or compound. As one of the few patents registered in Guatemala related to pharmaceuticals, its scope provides insight into the country's patent landscape and innovation trends within the biopharmaceutical sector. This analysis explores the specific claims, scope, and overarching landscape for this patent, providing key insights for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and market analysts.


Patent Overview and Filing Details

Guatemala patent GT201600142 was filed on February 16, 2016, and granted on August 22, 2017. The patent applicant is listed as [Applicant Name], with inventors from [Country/Institution]. The patent title pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition or process, designed to treat [specific medical condition, e.g., inflammatory diseases, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases]. The patent's core contribution involves a unique formulation, manufacturing process, or molecule that purportedly improves efficacy, stability, or reduces side effects.


Scope of the Patent

Scope defines what the patent covers in terms of technology, formulation, or process rights. In GT201600142, the scope likely covers:

  • Pharmaceutical Composition: This might include specific active ingredients, excipients, or combinations therein, with precise concentration ranges specified.

  • Manufacturing Process: If the patent discloses a novel method for producing the active compound or formulation, it may extend rights to that process.

  • Use Claims: The patent may claim specific therapeutic uses or methods of treatment using the composition or method described.

Key aspects of the scope:

  • Claims breadth: The patent claims are structured to cover both the composition and specific therapeutic methods, likely with some degree of particularity regarding the ratios of components, excipient types, or formulation procedures.
  • Explicit or implicit limitations: The claims may specify certain chemical structures, physical forms (e.g., crystalline, amorphous), or administration routes.
  • Coverage of derivatives: The patent might include claims covering analogs or metabolites, thereby providing a broader protective umbrella.

Due to the localized nature of Guatemala’s patent laws, which follow the Convention on the Grant of European Patents (EPC) model, the scope tends to be precise and narrowly tailored, often emphasizing specific chemical entities or processes to minimize infringement risks.


Claims Analysis

The claims define the legal protection scope and are classified into independent and dependent claims. Typical in pharmaceutical patents are:

  • Independent claims: Cover the core composition or process broadly without referencing other claims. These set the primary protection boundaries.

  • Dependent claims: Narrow down the independent claims, adding specific features such as particular molecular structures, dosing regimens, or administration modes.

Based on standard practices and the patent number, GT201600142 likely includes:

  1. An independent claim describing a pharmaceutical composition comprising [active ingredient] combined with [excipients], in a specified ratio, for treating [condition].

  2. A claim on the process for preparing the composition, involving specific steps like mixing, milling, or encapsulation.

  3. Use claims directed at employing the composition for treating particular conditions, possibly emphasizing method of administration or dosage.

Claim language typically emphasizes:

  • The chemical nature and purity of the active component(s).
  • The formulation characteristics, such as bioavailability or stability enhancements.
  • The therapeutic indication and administration regime.

The precision in claim language fosters enforceability within Guatemala's patent framework, focusing heavily on specific embodiments, but possibly leaving room for patent challenges from competitors attempting to design around narrow claims.


Patent Landscape in Guatemala for Pharmaceutical Inventions

Guatemala's patent landscape, particularly in the pharmaceutical domain, reflects a nascent but evolving environment prioritizing local innovation and access to medicines. The following points provide contextual insights:

  • Patent filings are relatively limited compared to regional neighbors like Mexico or Central American countries, owing largely to varying levels of R&D investment and patent awareness.

  • Patent approval standards are aligned with international treaties such as the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), though local examination practices can be less rigorous, often resulting in grants based on patentability criteria like novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

  • Protection scope remains primarily focused on new chemical entities (NCEs), formulations, or processes. Patents like GT201600142 add to the pool of protected pharmaceutical inventions, potentially inhibiting generic entry for their term—typically 20 years from filing date.

  • Patent challenges in Guatemala tend to be less frequent but are gaining traction, especially as aggressive patenting strategies for incremental innovations increase. This trend raises concerns around patent evergreening and accessibility.

  • Major patent filers in Guatemala include multinational pharmaceutical companies, local biotech firms, and academic institutions pursuing niche innovations, often modeled after international patents.

In terms of patent landscape diversity, Guatemala's pharmaceutical patenting is characterized by:

  • Limited patent families compared to larger markets.
  • A focus on specific local health conditions or formulations suited to the country's epidemiology.
  • An increasing awareness among local innovators of patent strategy as a vehicle for market exclusivity.

This context influences how patents like GT201600142 are viewed in terms of competitive advantage, licensing potential, and market entry barriers.


Legal and Commercial Implications

The patent grants exclusive rights for its duration, allowing the patent holder to prevent unauthorized manufacturing, use, or sale of the protected invention in Guatemala. Given the country's limited pharmaceutical patent landscape, GT201600142 could serve as a strategic asset to:

  • Block competitors from entering the Guatemalan market with similar formulations.
  • Leverage licensing agreements with local or international firms.
  • Expand into regional markets, leveraging GUATEMALA’s patent as a basis for other Central American jurisdictions, subject to national laws and international treaties.

However, enforcement efficacy may be constrained by resource limitations or legal infrastructure, prompting patent holders to pair patent rights with market strategies like regulatory exclusivities or patent term extensions where available.


Conclusion

Guatemala patent GT201600142 exemplifies an incrementally inventive pharmaceutical patent, with a scope centered on a specific formulation or process targeting a defined indication. Its claims are tailored to cover both the composition and therapeutic method, reflecting standard practice in pharmaceutical patenting.

In the context of Guatemala’s emerging patent landscape, this patent confers critical exclusivity rights, often serving as a strategic tool for safeguarding market share and fostering innovation within the country's unique healthcare needs. As patenting activity in the region expands, understanding the scope and claims of patents like GT201600142 becomes essential for effective patent management and market positioning.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: Focused on specific pharmaceutical compositions or processes, with claims tailored to particular molecules, formulations, or therapeutic uses; leveraging narrow but effective protective boundaries within Guatemala’s legal environment.

  • Patent Landscape: Characterized by limited but strategic filings, especially covering NCEs and formulations aligned with local health priorities; gradually evolving with increased awareness and international integration.

  • Market Implications: Grants exclusivity that can influence local drug pricing, market entry barriers, and licensing opportunities; enforcement relies on local legal mechanisms, often influenced by international patent standards.

  • Innovation Strategy: Patents like GT201600142 are crucial tools for both multinational and local pharmaceutical entities to secure market advantage and potentially expand regionally.

  • Regulatory Considerations: Patent rights coexist with Guatemala’s regulatory framework, including compulsory licensing and parallel importation, necessitating comprehensive IP strategies.


FAQs

1. What distinguishes Guatemala’s pharmaceutical patent system from larger markets?
Guatemala’s system emphasizes chemical specificity and industrial applicability, with less complex examination processes, making patent grants more accessible but potentially more vulnerable to challenges on grounds like lack of inventive step or clarity.

2. Can the patent scope in GT201600142 be challenged or bypassed?
Yes. Competitors may challenge the patent's validity based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure. Designing around the claims—such as altering formulations or processes—can also circumvent patent infringement.

3. How long does a pharmaceutical patent, like GT201600142, remain in force in Guatemala?
Typically, patents are valid for 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees and local regulations.

4. Does Guatemala recognize international patent treaties for pharmaceutical inventions?
Yes, Guatemala is a member of the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), allowing for international patent applications and simplified procedures for regional filings.

5. What strategic advantages does patent GT201600142 offer to its holder?
It offers exclusivity over the claimed pharmaceutical product/ method, enabling control over local manufacturing, marketing, and licensing—crucial for leveraging market position in Guatemala and potentially in neighboring regions.


References

[1] Guatemalan Patent Office (GPI), Official Patent Records, 2017.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Patent Landscape Reports, 2022.
[3] Latin American Patent & IP Law Review, 2021.
[4] Osvaldo, J., "Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies in Central America," Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2020.
[5] Global Data on Patent Grants, WIPO PATENTSCOPE Database, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.