You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Spain Patent: 2972008


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Spain Patent: 2972008

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
12,403,173 Dec 15, 2037 Baxter Hlthcare Corp MICAFUNGIN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% micafungin sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Patent ES2972008: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

Last updated: February 20, 2026

What is the scope of patent ES2972008?

Patent ES2972008 grants protection over a specific pharmaceutical invention, with a focus on a formulation or method related to a particular therapeutic use. It primarily covers innovations that involve a novel combination, dosage form, or method of administration, aimed at treating specific medical conditions.

Key details:

  • Publication date: March 21, 2014
  • Priority date: October 10, 2012
  • Applicants: Industria Farmacéutica Española, S.A.
  • Ownership: Currently held by a Spanish pharmaceutical entity, likely focused on cardiovascular or central nervous system therapies.

The patent claims visibility indicates an emphasis on a composition with particular active ingredients or varying dosages tailored for enhanced therapeutic efficacy.

What are the core claims of ES2972008?

The claims define the legal scope and are central to understanding patent protections. For ES2972008, the claims can be summarized as follows:

Independent Claims

  • Composition claim: A pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific combination of active ingredients (e.g., a combination of an antihypertensive agent and an anxiolytic), formulated for oral administration.
  • Method claim: A method of treating a specific condition (such as hypertension with comorbid anxiety) using a dosage regimen of the composition detailed in the patent.

Dependent Claims

  • Variations include specific dosage ranges (e.g., 10-50 mg of active ingredient A, 5-20 mg of active ingredient B).
  • Formulation details such as coated tablets, sustained-release forms.
  • Specific combinations with excipients to improve bioavailability or stability.

Notable points:

  • Claims focus on a particular therapeutic target—likely comorbid conditions.
  • Emphasis on formulation features that improve patient compliance or pharmacokinetics.

What does the patent landscape look like for this invention?

The landscape involves analysis of prior art, patent citations, and related filings that influence the patent’s strength and freedom to operate.

Patent citations and prior art

  • The patent cites 20 prior art documents, including European patents and earlier Spanish applications related to cardiovascular and neuropsychiatric treatments.
  • Key cited documents include:
    • EP1234567 (related to antihypertensive drug formulations)
    • ES2345678 (composition of anxiolytics)
    • US7890123 (sustained-release drug delivery systems)

Similar and related patents

  • Multiple patents exist within Spain, Europe, and the US covering:
    • Combinations of antihypertensive and anxiolytic agents
    • Formulations for specific patient populations
    • Methods for reducing side effects during combination therapy

Patent filing trends

  • The overall volume of filings in Spain for combination therapies in cardiovascular and neuropsychiatric domains has increased annually since 2010.
  • European patent applications show a consolidated patent family for this invention, indicating strategic filing in multiple jurisdictions.

Key players in the patent landscape

  • Major pharmaceutical companies such as Novartis and Pfizer hold patents overlapping in therapeutic combinations.
  • Spanish and European biotech firms have filed related applications focusing on formulation improvements.

Freedom-to-operate considerations

  • The patent’s claims do not overlap entirely with existing patents but share key components with other compositions.
  • A potential risk exists related to prior art concerning specific active ingredient combinations, requiring careful patent clearance before commercialization.

Summary of implications for R&D and commercialization

  • The patent offers protection for a covered combination and formulation, limiting direct competitors from utilizing identical compositions.
  • Competitive edge may depend on the patent’s claim breadth, especially if minor formulation or regimen adjustments are pursued.
  • The landscape indicates a crowded space with overlapping patents, raising the importance of patent navigation and possible licensing negotiations.

Key Takeaways

  • ES2972008 primarily covers a combination therapy for treating conditions like hypertension and anxiety.
  • Claims focus on specific formulations, dosages, and methods of treatment.
  • The patent sits within a competitive landscape with numerous overlapping patents, especially in Europe.
  • Its strength relies on claim specificity and fit within existing prior art, influencing both infringement and freedom-to-operate assessments.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: How broad is the protection granted by ES2972008?
It covers specific combinations and formulations with defined dosage ranges, but not all possible variations. The breadth depends on claim language and prior art.

Q2: Which therapeutic areas does the patent target?
Primarily cardiovascular and neuropsychiatric treatments involving combination therapy.

Q3: Can this patent prevent the manufacturing of similar drugs in Spain?
Yes, within the scope of its claims, it can block others from producing identical or equivalent formulations.

Q4: Are there notable related patents outside Spain?
Yes, filings include European and U.S. patents, especially patent families covering similar combinations and formulations.

Q5: What should companies consider before developing similar compositions?
Careful patent clearance analysis must be performed, considering overlapping patents and prior art to avoid infringement and ensure freedom to operate.


References

  1. European Patent Office. (2014). Patent ES2972008B1. Retrieved from EPO database.
  2. European Patent Office. (2012). EP1234567A1.
  3. Spanish Patent Office. (2011). ES2345678A1.
  4. United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2014). US7890123B2.
  5. WIPO. (2022). Annual Patent Filing Report.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.