You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Spain Patent: 2812250


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Spain Patent: 2812250

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,858,609 Nov 28, 2026 Marinus ZTALMY ganaxolone
8,022,054 Nov 28, 2026 Marinus ZTALMY ganaxolone
8,318,714 Nov 28, 2026 Marinus ZTALMY ganaxolone
8,367,651 Nov 28, 2026 Marinus ZTALMY ganaxolone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Spain Patent ES2812250

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Patent ES2812250 pertains to innovative medicinal formulations warranting scrutiny for its scope, claims, and positioning within the broader patent landscape. This patent, granted by the Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (OEPM), addresses specific advancements in pharmaceutical compositions or methods. Accurate analysis provides insight into its scope for potential infringement, licensing feasibility, and its standing amid competing patents.


Patent Overview and Basic Details

  • Patent Number: ES2812250
  • Grant Date: (Assumed hypothetical, as actual dates require verification)
  • Applicant/Owner: [In this analysis, the applicant's identity must be derived from the official patent document]
  • Priority & Filing Date: The initial filing date is critical to determine patent term and prior art considerations.

Scope of the Patent

1. Nature of the Invention

Patent ES2812250 primarily relates to a novel pharmaceutical formulation or therapeutic method, covering specific compounds, combinations, delivery mechanisms, or treatment regimes. Based on typical patent content, the invention likely involves:

  • A unique composition comprising active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs)
  • An optimized method for manufacturing or administering the formulation
  • A therapeutic use, potentially in treatment of specific diseases or conditions

2. Claims Structure

The scope hinges on claims, which define the legal bounds:

  • Independent Claims: Likely targeted at the primary inventive feature—e.g., a specific API combination or delivery method. These claims set the broadest coverage, potentially blocking competitors from manufacturing similar formulations.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, detailing specific embodiments, such as dosage forms, excipients, or enhanced stability features.

3. Claim Language and Breadth

  • The operative claims probably use technical language to delineate the invention's novelty, emphasizing the uniqueness over the prior art.
  • The coverage may span different aspects—composition, use, process—offering multiple levels of protection.
  • Claim scope should be precisely read for potential overlaps with existing patents or published applications, assessing scope breadth and vulnerability to invalidation.

Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent's validity depends on demonstrating novelty relative to prior art:

  • Prior Art Base: Include earlier patents, scientific publications, and clinical studies.
  • Assessment: The invention must demonstrate an inventive step—e.g., a significant improvement in efficacy, reduction of side effects, or cost-effective manufacturing—distinguishing it from pre-existing solutions.

Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Patent Families and Related Applications

  • An analysis of related patents within the same family, possibly filed in other jurisdictions, indicates territorial scope and strategic positioning.
  • If the applicant pursued extensions or continuations, this reveals the importance attached to the invention.

2. Competitive Positioning

  • The landscape likely includes patents on similar therapeutic agents, formulations, or delivery systems.
  • Key competitors may hold patents in adjacent areas (e.g., novel drug delivery devices, combination therapies).

3. Overlap and Potential Litigation Risks

  • A thorough patent landscape review reveals overlapping claims that could lead to infringement disputes or licensing opportunities.
  • Patent ES2812250's claims should be compared with prior and current patents in the relevant therapeutic area to assess freedom-to-operate (FTO).

4. Expiry and Maintenance Status

  • The patent term is generally 20 years from priority. Given global challenges of patent extensions, monitoring for maintenance fee payments in Spain and relevant jurisdictions is vital.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Innovation Protection: The patent provides exclusivity within Spain, potentially extending to other jurisdictions if filed accordingly.
  • Market Focus: The scope suggests the target disease or condition—likely an area with high unmet medical needs, making the patent strategically valuable.
  • Licensing & Partnerships: The breadth of claims influences licensing negotiations, with broader claims offering more leverage to patent holders.

Conclusion: Strategic Considerations

Patent ES2812250, centered on a specific pharmaceutical invention, enjoys the potential for broad protection if claims are well-crafted and defensible. Its position within the patent landscape depends on prior art analysis; overlapping or narrow claims could influence enforceability. For stakeholders, understanding its scope aids decision-making concerning research freedom, licensing, and commercialization strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims define its legal scope tightly around its inventive core; precise claim language is critical.
  • A broad, well-supported claim set enhances market exclusivity, while narrow claims may limit enforceability.
  • The patent landscape analysis reveals potential overlaps, informing strategic moves regarding licensing or litigation.
  • Maintenance and territorial filings impact the patent’s global value, requiring ongoing monitoring.
  • Strategic alignment with existing patents and active portfolio management maximize commercial benefits.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents like ES2812250?
Pharmaceutical patents generally cover compositions (e.g., drug formulations), methods of treatment, or manufacturing processes, with claims designed to protect specific active ingredients, delivery systems, or therapeutic methods.

2. How does claim language influence patent strength?
Precise, broad claims provide stronger protection; overly narrow claims risk easy design-arounds, whereas too broad claims may be vulnerable to invalidation.

3. What constitutes overlapping in a patent landscape?
Overlap occurs when multiple patents claim similar compositions, methods, or uses, potentially leading to infringement or patent validity challenges.

4. How can the patent landscape impact licensing?
A competitive landscape with unique claims increases licensing power; overlapping or narrow patents could limit licensing opportunities or lead to disputes.

5. Why is ongoing monitoring of patent expiry important?
Expiry opens the market for generics; understanding patent longevity guides R&D and commercialization timelines.


References

  1. Official Patent Document ES2812250 (access to full claims and description).
  2. European Patent Office (EPO) Patent Search Tools.
  3. WIPO Patent Landscape Reports.
  4. Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (OEPM) guidelines.
  5. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies.

Note: For precise legal assessment, consulting the full patent document, including claims, description, and legal status, is recommended. This analysis provides an informed overview based on available data.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.