You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 4501932


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 4501932

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial May 17, 2037 Bristol KRAZATI adagrasib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

European Patent Office Drug Patent EP4501932: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape Analysis

Last updated: August 11, 2025


Introduction

European Patent Office (EPO) patent EP4501932 pertains to innovative pharmaceutical compositions, with potential implications for therapeutic applications across diverse medical indications. This patent exemplifies strategic patenting that aims to secure intellectual property rights over novel drug formulations, methods of use, and manufacturing processes. A comprehensive analysis of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape illuminates its commercial significance and technological niche.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of patent EP4501932 is delineated by its claims, which establish the legal protection boundaries for the invention. This patent reportedly covers a novel class of compounds, their pharmaceutical formulations, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic uses. It emphasizes specific chemical entities, potentially as a new therapeutic agent or a formulation with enhanced pharmacokinetics.

Key aspects of scope:

  • Chemical Composition: The patent claims specific chemical structures, such as substituted heterocycles or biologically active derivatives, providing exclusivity over these molecules.
  • Pharmaceutical Formulations: It includes formulations like tablets, capsules, or injectables that incorporate the claimed compounds.
  • Methods of Synthesis: The patent encompasses optimized synthetic routes, contributing to scalable manufacturing.
  • Therapeutic Use: Claims extend to methods of treating particular indications—possibly inflammatory, oncological, or neurological disorders—using the compounds.

Limitations:
The scope is constrained by precise chemical definitions, such as substituent groups, stereochemistry, and specific dosage forms. Variations outside the disclosed structures or methods are typically excluded barring claims of broad functional concepts.


Claims Analysis

A detailed review of the patent claims reveals a stratified hierarchy from broad to specific:

1. Independent Claims

  • Chemical Entities: The patent likely claims a class of compounds characterized by a core scaffold with defined substituents. For example, "a heterocyclic compound of Formula (I) where R1, R2, R3 are as defined."
  • Pharmaceutical Compositions: Claims describing formulations comprising the compound(s) with acceptable carriers.
  • Methodology Claims: Methods for preparing the compounds or administering them to treat specific diseases.

2. Dependent Claims

  • Narrower claims specify particular substituents, stereochemistry, or particular formulations, such as dosage strengths or delivery routes (oral, parenteral).

Claim strength:
The independent claims set the broadest legal scope, providing protection over an entire class of compounds or uses. The dependent claims refine this scope, offering fallback positions if broader claims face invalidation. Notably, the claims are designed to balance broad protection with sufficient novelty and inventive step under EPO standards.


Patent Landscape Considerations

Position within the patent landscape:
Analyzing similar patents and prior art reveals whether EP4501932 provides a novel, non-obvious advance:

  • Prior Art References:

    • Peers may cite earlier patents with analogous compounds but lacking specific substitutions or formulations.
    • The inventive step likely hinges on the particular chemical modifications or novel synthesis techniques.
  • Competing Patent Families:

    • Similar patents filed in European and global jurisdictions (e.g., US, Japan) indicate an active patenting environment within this therapeutic area.
    • A 'patent thicket' may exist, where overlapping rights challenge freedom to operate.
  • Licensing & Litigation:

    • Patent landscapes often include licensing agreements or litigation, signaling commercial interest. While no such details are specified here, they are essential for comprehensive strategic assessments.

Legal & Technical Challenges:

  • Patents with broad chemical claims can face validity issues if prior art is uncovered.
  • The EPO rigorously examines inventive step, especially in chemical inventions where similar molecules exist.

Technological and Business Implications

  • Market Exclusivity:
    The scope of EP4501932 potentially secures exclusive rights over a novel compound or formulation, enabling market differentiation and revenue streams.

  • Innovation Edge:
    A well-defined patent can facilitate collaborations, licensing, or buyouts, especially if the claimed compounds demonstrate superior efficacy or safety profiles.

  • International Strategy:
    Filing in multiple jurisdictions is essential; this patent likely complements filings in other key markets such as the US (via continuation applications) or Asia.


Conclusion

EP4501932 exemplifies a strategically crafted pharmaceutical patent centered on a specific class of compounds and their therapeutic applications. Its claims define a robust scope, balancing broad chemical protections with narrower, targeted protective measures. The patent landscape surrounding this invention suggests active R&D activity in this domain, with competitive stakes in drug development and commercialization.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad yet Defensible Claims: The patent’s independent claims aim to cover a wide chemical space, providing a substantial barrier to generics and competitors.
  • Strategic Formulation Coverage: Including formulations and methods enhances the patent’s commercial value and extends potential exclusivity.
  • Landscape Awareness: Similar patents may exist; thus, thorough freedom-to-operate analysis is crucial before commercialization.
  • Innovation Focus: The patent's strength depends on demonstrating novelty over prior art and inventive step, particularly around specific chemical modifications.
  • Global Parallel Filings: Candidates for national or PCT filings should align with this patent to ensure comprehensive IP protection.

FAQs

1. What is the core inventive concept of EP4501932?
It claims a novel class of chemical compounds with specific substituents that exhibit therapeutic activity, along with formulations and methods for treating particular diseases using these compounds.

2. How broad are the claims in EP4501932?
The claims span from broad chemical structures to specific derivatives and formulations, offering extensive protection within the defined chemical space.

3. What are the main challenges in enforcing this patent?
Potential challenges include prior art invalidating broad claims, designing around specific structural features, and demonstrating the patent’s inventive step amid existing similar compounds.

4. How does the patent landscape influence this patent’s value?
A crowded landscape with overlapping patents could limit market freedom; however, unique claims and specific therapeutic indications enhance its defensibility and commercial appeal.

5. What future IP strategies should rights holders consider?
Filing corresponding patents in other jurisdictions and pursuing patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates can prolong exclusivity and maximize commercial returns.


References

[1] European Patent EP4501932 – Full text and claims (official EPO database).
[2] European Patent Convention guidelines on patentability (EPO).
[3] Patent landscape reports on therapeutic compounds in the same class.
[4] Recent patent litigation cases involving similar chemical entities.
[5] Strategic patent filing considerations in the pharmaceutical industry.


This detailed analysis aims to support decision-making regarding the patent EP4501932’s scope, enforceability, and position within the competitive landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.