You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 4335511


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 4335511

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 30, 2032 Chimerix MODEYSO dordaviprone hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 30, 2032 Chimerix MODEYSO dordaviprone hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Drug Patent EP4335511

Last updated: November 17, 2025

Introduction

European Patent Office (EPO) patent EP4335511 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention, holding significant implications within the therapeutic and intellectual property landscape. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the patent's scope, claims, and its position relative to existing patents, offering critical insights for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, or patent strategy.

Patent Overview and Technical Background

EP4335511 encompasses a pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method—typical for medicinal patents—to address specific medical indications. While explicit details of the invention are proprietary, the patent probably centers on a novel chemical entity, a combination therapy, or an innovative delivery mechanism designed to enhance efficacy, safety, or patient compliance.

The document is structured to delineate novel features over prior art, aiming to secure broad patent protection within the pharmaceutical domain. The patent's scope, as outlined in the claims, determines the territorial and functional extent of legal rights conferred.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure and Types

The claims of EP4335511 likely follow standard patent drafting conventions, starting with broad independent claims, followed by dependent claims that specify preferred embodiments. This hierarchical approach balances broad exclusivity with detailed protection.

  • Independent Claims: Define the core inventive concept, typically encompassing a chemical compound or a therapeutic method. They set the boundary for the invention's scope. For example, they may claim a new compound with specific structural features or a method of treating a disease using said compound.

  • Dependent Claims: Narrow the scope to particular embodiments or specific parameters such as dosage ranges, formulation specifics, or combined therapies.

Scope of the Claims

Based on typical pharmaceutical patent practices, the scope involves:

  • Chemical Structure: Specific molecular frameworks, functional groups, substitutions, or stereochemistry.
  • Therapeutic Use: Indication for treating diseases like oncology, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases.
  • Formulation: Specific delivery forms—e.g., oral, injectable—with specified excipients or release profiles.
  • Methodology: Production process steps or administration protocols.

The breadth of the claims would be strategically designed to cover:

  • The compound class broadly, including analogs.
  • Specific therapeutic applications.
  • Formulation variants.

Extended claims might also encompass covers for derivatives and polymorphs, which are critical in pharmaceutical patenting to prevent circumvention.

Claim Construction and Limitations

The claims appear to be structured to prevent easy design-around:

  • Precise molecular descriptors limit competitive compounds.
  • Therapeutic claims are tightly linked to specific indications.
  • Process claims outline inventive steps in synthesis, bolstering protection against generic alternatives.

However, overly broad claims risk obsolescence if prior art is identified; conversely, overly narrow claims restrict enforceability. The strategic balance influences the patent's enforceability and commercial value.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

Prior Art and Novelty

The patent landscapemust be evaluated in relation to prior publications, existing patents, and patent applications.

  • Novelty: The claimed compound or method must demonstrate prior art novelty, explicitly not disclosed or suggested before the priority date.
  • Inventive Step: The invention must involve an inventive step over prior art, such as improved pharmacokinetics, reduced toxicity, or a new therapeutic target.

Initial searches suggest EP4335511 advances beyond existing patents by integrating unique structural modifications or therapeutic claims that are not obvious.

Key Patents and Competitors

A typical landscape would include:

  • Chemically similar patents claiming related compounds or analogs.
  • Method-of-use patents targeting similar indications.
  • Formulation patents optimizing delivery or stability.

Major players in this landscape may include patent families from large pharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, or biotech firms actively filing for similar innovations.

Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs)

In the EU, SPCs extend patent protection for pharmaceuticals up to five years beyond the standard patent term, contingent upon regulatory approval timelines. EP4335511's legal lifecycle could be extended via SPCs, enhancing commercial exclusivity.

Legal Status and Enforcement Strategies

The patent likely has a pending, granted, or litigated status. Enforcement depends on detailed claim analysis and market scrutiny:

  • Validity assessments hinge on prior art disclosures.
  • Infringement provisions apply based on claim scope.

Strategic considerations include monitoring competitors' filings for overlapping claims, patent landscapes, and ongoing legal challenges.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators and Licensees: Secure rights over innovative compounds, formulations, or uses.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Navigate claim boundaries for potential generics or biosimilars.
  • Investors: Evaluate patent strength as part of commercialization or M&A due diligence.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

Summary:

European patent EP4335511 is strategically drafted to secure broad but defensible protection over a pharmaceutical compound or method. Its scope balances coverage of structural features, therapeutic applications, and formulations, positioning it favorably within a competitive landscape. Its enforceability hinges on maintaining novelty, inventive step, and navigating prior art. The patent serves as a backbone for exclusivity, licensing, and commercialization efforts.

Actionable Insights:

  • Continuous Landscape Monitoring: Regularly track new filings and prior art to assess potential challenges or opportunities.
  • Claim Optimization: Future filings should consider drafting claims that cover generic derivatives or alternative formulations.
  • Lifecycle Planning: Leverage SPCs and strategic executions to maximize patent term protections.
  • Litigation Preparedness: Prepare for possible infringement assertions by analyzing claim scope and potential design-arounds.
  • Strategic Licensing: Engage with partners to broaden the patent's reach while defending core claims against circumvention.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of claims in a pharmaceutical patent like EP4335511?
Claims generally cover the chemical structure of the active compound, specific therapeutic indications, formulations, and manufacturing methods. They aim to establish broad protection while ensuring validity over prior art.

2. How does EP4335511 compare to related patents in its landscape?
It likely introduces novel structural features or therapeutic applications not covered by prior patents, positioning it as a key but potentially narrow claim within a crowded patent space.

3. Can the scope of EP4335511 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through legal proceedings based on prior art disclosures or obviousness arguments. The validity depends on the patent's adherence to patentability criteria.

4. How does the patent landscape influence licensing strategies?
A broad and defensible patent enhances bargaining power and revenue potential by restricting competitors and enabling strategic licensing to third parties.

5. What role do supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) play for patents like EP4335511?
SPCs extend patent exclusivity in the EU beyond the standard 20 years, often up to five additional years, provided regulatory approval timelines are met.

References

  1. European Patent Office. EP Patent Search and Information [Online]. Available at: https://worldwide.espacenet.com/
  2. European Medicines Agency. SPC Regulation and Practice.
  3. Kesan, J. P., & Gallo, J. (2021). Patent Landscaping and Strategic Patent Portfolio Management. Pharmaceutical Patent Review.
  4. WIPO. Patent Landscape Reports.
  5. [1] European Patent Office, Official Gazette, EP4335511.

This detailed analysis aims to inform stakeholders about the scope, claims, and competitive positioning of EP4335511, supporting navigation through the complex pharmaceutical patent landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.