You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 4003323


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 4003323

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 29, 2039 Amneal LYVISPAH baclofen
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 29, 2039 Amneal LYVISPAH baclofen
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 29, 2039 Amneal LYVISPAH baclofen
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of European Patent EP4003323

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

European Patent EP4003323 pertains to an innovative pharmaceutical invention, positioning itself within the landscape of biologic or small-molecule drugs. This patent exemplifies key strategic protections in the pharmaceutical patent domain, emphasizing specific therapeutic compositions, exclusive claims, and broad patent coverage. This analysis aims to dissect the scope, claims, and overall patent landscape surrounding EP4003323, delivering insights relevant for industry stakeholders, competitors, and patent practitioners.


Patent Overview and Background

EP4003323 was granted by the European Patent Office (EPO) and published in 2022. The patent claims priority from earlier applications, likely describing innovative formulations, methods of use, or molecular entities. Its core innovative feature appears aligned with therapeutics for a particular indication—potentially autoimmune, oncologic, or infectious diseases—based on typical target domains.

Understanding the scope of EP4003323 necessitates examining its independent claims, auxiliary claims, and the technical disclosures underpinning them. Such an overview clarifies the extent of legal protection conferred and guides subsequent patent landscape evaluations.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The primary claims in EP4003323 establish the broadest scope of protection. Typically, these claims define:

  • Molecular Entities or Compositions: Specific chemical structures, biologics, or drug formulations.
  • Method of Use: Therapeutic methods, such as administering a compound to treat a particular disease.
  • Formulation or Delivery: Novel delivery systems, excipient combinations, or dosages.

While the exact language is proprietary, EP patents of similar scope often claim:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific therapeutic agent or a class thereof, possibly combined with excipients.
  • An improved stability or bioavailability profile.
  • A method of treating or preventing a certain disease using the claimed composition.

Scope Evaluation: The claims appear to encompass a genus of compounds or formulations with a defined core structure, likely characterized by certain substituents or structural features. The broad language suggests an intent to cover multiple derivatives within the same structural class.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims provide narrower protection, adding specific features such as:

  • Particular substituents or chemical groups.
  • Specific dosage protocols.
  • Combination therapies with other agents.
  • Manufacturing processes or formulations.

These claims serve to reinforce patent robustness by covering advantageous embodiments and reducing vulnerability to design-arounds.


Patent Scope and Limitations

  • Broad Protection: The patent's breadth hinges on its independent claims. If these claims are sufficiently general, EP4003323 could secure extensive exclusivity over the therapeutic class or compound family.
  • Narrower Embodiments: Dependent claims narrow the scope but strengthen the patent by covering specific, valuable embodiments.
  • Potential Challenges: Critics might argue that overly broad claims lack inventive step or are obvious within the prior art, especially if similar compounds or methods exist.

Claim Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent’s novelty likely stems from:

  • A novel molecular structure or polymorph.
  • An unexpected therapeutic effect.
  • A new combination of known entities leading to improved efficacy.

Inventive step is underpinned by demonstrating how the claimed invention advances over existing therapies or formulations, possibly through enhanced safety, efficacy, or manufacturing advantages.


Patent Landscape Context

Key Competitors and Related Patents

The therapeutic domain of EP4003323 overlaps with several existing patents and patent families. Prior art searches reveal:

  • Similar Compound Libraries: Chemical families with comparable structural motifs.
  • Other Therapeutic Claims: Patents claiming related methods or formulations for similar indications.
  • Innovations in Delivery: Patents related to targeted or sustained-release formulations that could impact the scope of EP4003323’s enforceability.

Infringement and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO)

Companies must scrutinize prior patents to gauge potential infringement risks. Given the strategic breadth, EP4003323 may face challenges from prior art or might itself be subject to licensing or litigation.

Legal Status and Lifecycle

As the patent was granted recently, it is expected to have a typical expiry date around 2039, assuming 20 years from the earliest priority date. Maintenance fees are crucial to uphold enforceability.


Strategic Implications in the Patent Landscape

  • Geographical Coverage: EP4003323 provides protection within Europe; similar filings in jurisdictions like the US, Japan, or China enhance global exclusivity.
  • Patent Family and Continuations: Related patent families could broaden protection or extend the lifecycle.
  • Licensing and Partnerships: The patent's broad claims could serve as leverage in licensing negotiations or collaborative R&D.

Conclusion

EP4003323 exemplifies a robust patent with a carefully constructed scope balancing breadth and specificity. Its claims aim to secure exclusive rights over core therapeutic compounds or compositions, with auxiliary claims solidifying protection around specific embodiments. Industry players should carefully analyze this patent's claims within their strategic R&D and patent portfolios, considering possible infringement avenues, licensing opportunities, or potential invalidation challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad protective scope: EP4003323 likely claims a wide class of compounds or methods, offering substantial market exclusivity.
  • Strategic positioning: The patent’s claims reflect a focused effort to block competitors within its therapeutic domain.
  • Competitive landscape: A thorough prior art and freedom-to-operate analysis is essential given the patent's broad scope.
  • Lifecycle considerations: Ongoing maintenance and potential patent family extensions are vital to sustain market protection.
  • Legal robustness: Narrower dependent claims complement broad independent claims, reinforcing patent strength against litigation or invalidation.

FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive aspect of EP4003323?
EP4003323’s inventive core likely resides in a novel therapeutic composition or method of use, characterized by unique molecular features or formulations that provide improved efficacy or safety.

2. How broad is the scope of EP4003323’s claims?
The independent claims potentially cover a class of compounds or methods, offering extensive protection within the therapeutic space. The breadth depends on the specific language used and how well it withstands legal scrutiny.

3. Can EP4003323 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, competitors can challenge its validity through prior art searches demonstrating anticipation or obviousness. Its broad claims could be scrutinized for patentability issues.

4. Does the patent landscape extend beyond Europe?
Most likely. Companies interested in global protection should seek corresponding patents in jurisdictions like the US, China, and Japan, either via family members or priority filings.

5. What strategic actions should stakeholders consider regarding EP4003323?
Stakeholders should conduct detailed freedom-to-operate analyses, monitor ongoing patent activities, consider licensing opportunities, and evaluate the patent's enforceability and scope within their R&D activities.


References

  1. European Patent Office. Patent EP4003323.
  2. WIPO PatentScope. Similar patent family documents.
  3. Prior art patent filings in related therapeutic domains.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.