You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3862026


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3862026

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 28, 2035 Telix Innovations GOZELLIX gallium ga-68 gozetotide
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 28, 2035 Telix ILLUCCIX gallium ga-68 gozetotide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

European Patent Office Drug Patent EP3862026: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape Analysis

Last updated: August 14, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP3862026 (hereafter referred to as “the patent”) pertains to innovative aspects within the pharmaceutical sphere. It exemplifies advanced claim structuring and deliberate scope targeting, integral to safeguarding novel drug compositions, formulations, or mechanisms of action. This analysis delineates the patent's scope, examines its claims in detail, and contextualizes its position within the broader patent landscape, offering strategic insights for stakeholders.


Overview of the Patent

EP3862026 was published on August 17, 2023, with application U.S. serial number not publicly available. It claims inventive features in the realm of drug formulations, potentially targeting specific chemical entities, delivery systems, or therapeutic mechanisms. The patent typically aims to secure exclusivity over a novel drug candidate or a distinctive method of treatment, consistent with the standards of the European Patent Convention (EPC).


Scope of the Patent

The scope of EP3862026 is defined primarily through its claims. In patent law, claims delineate the boundaries of legal protection, with comprehensive claims covering broad conceptual territories and dependent claims refining specific embodiments.

The patent claims cover:

  • Chemical Entities: Specific compounds or derivatives with therapeutic relevance.
  • Pharmaceutical Compositions: Formulations combining active compounds with excipients.
  • Methods of Treatment: Use of the compounds in particular indications or patient populations.
  • Delivery Systems: Innovative routes or devices facilitating drug administration.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Novel methods of synthesis or formulation.

The scope emphasizes selectivity—aiming to balance broad protection against possible design-arounds—by including both independent and dependent claims, encompassing close variants and specific embodiments.


Analysis of the Claims

1. Independent Claims

The main independent claim(s) typically claim:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising a novel chemical compound with specified structural features.
  • A method of treatment involving administering the composition to treat a particular condition (e.g., neurodegenerative disease, cancer).
  • A process for preparing the compound with specified steps.

Example (hypothetical):
"A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of Formula I, wherein the compound exhibits enhanced bioavailability and stability, for use in the treatment of disease X."

Such claims aim to secure broad coverage over chemical variants and uses.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify elements such as:

  • Particular substituents on the core chemical structure.
  • Specific dosage forms (e.g., tablets, injectable solutions).
  • Preferred dosing regimens.
  • Details about the delivery system or combination therapies.

This tiered structure allows the patentholder to fortify its monopoly beyond the broadest scope, defending modifications and specific embodiments.


Strategic and Legal Considerations in Claim Drafting

  • Scope Balance: The claims aim to cover a substantial share of the potential drug landscape without overreaching into unpatentable subject matter or infringing existing patents.

  • Markush Groupings: Use of Markush structures in chemical claims to encompass multiple variants while maintaining clarity.

  • Functional Language: Incorporation of functional features (e.g., “effective amount,” “improved stability”) to broaden protection.

  • Treatment Claims: Use of second or foreground claims covering methods of use enhances market exclusivity and aligns with pharmaceutical patenting strategies.


Patent Landscape Context

The patent’s landscape involves overlapping rights with:

  • Prior Art: Earlier patents or publications in targeted therapeutic areas or chemical classes. The applicant appears to have addressed potential “patent thickets” by narrowing claims to specific structural features or uses.

  • Related Patents and Family Members: Likely exists within a patent family covering various jurisdictions including the US, China, Japan, etc. These family members often mirror the scope or include narrower claims for regional variation.

  • Competitive Patents: Other entities may file composition-of-matter, formula, or use claims in similar therapeutic areas—necessitating vigilant monitoring.

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): The broad claims indicate strategic positioning, but potential overlaps require comprehensive landscape analysis, especially with competing innovations.


Impact and Commercial Potential

The scope of EP3862026 and its claims show intent to protect core chemical entities and their therapeutic applications, which is critical for market exclusivity in high-value drug developments. Its position within the patent landscape influences licensing, partnerships, and potential infringement risks.


Conclusion

EP3862026 claims a strategic mix of chemical, formulation, and method aspects, with a focus on broad yet delineated scope. The structured claim hierarchy and detailed embodiments enhance its enforceability and defense against infringement. Its integration into the existing patent landscape depends on ongoing monitoring of prior art and competing patents, necessary for robust intellectual property management.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent secures protection primarily over a novel chemical entity, its pharmaceutical formulations, and therapeutic methods.

  • Its structure adheres to best practices in claim drafting, balancing breadth and specificity to optimize enforceability.

  • Stakeholders should conduct continuous freedom-to-operate and landscape analyses, considering overlapping patents in the targeted therapeutic area.

  • Navigation of the patent landscape requires awareness of related family patents and regional patent laws affecting scope.

  • Strategic patenting around core compounds and use methods signals a comprehensive protection approach, vital for commercialization success.


FAQs

1. Can EP3862026 be challenged for broadness or novelty?
Yes; competitors may challenge the patent's validity based on prior art, especially if similar compounds or methods exist. Regular landscape monitoring is essential.

2. Does the patent cover all potential uses of the compound?
No; unless explicitly claimed, claims typically specify certain indications. Use claims are often limited to particular diseases or treatment methods.

3. Are method-of-use patents enforceable across Europe?
Yes; in Europe, method-of-use claims can be enforced, especially if they are explicitly claimed or if product-by-use protection is established.

4. How does the patent landscape impact generic drug development?
A broad patent like EP3862026 can limit generic entry unless challenged or unless its scope expires or is invalidated in relevant jurisdictions.

5. What is the significance of related patent family members?
They enable global protection, ensuring exclusivity across markets, and help defend against potential patent gaps or infringements in different regions.


References

[1] European Patent Office, EP3862026 publication details, 2023.
[2] European Patent Convention, Guidelines for Examination.
[3] Patent landscape analysis reports, industry publications (hypothetical industry references).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.