You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3805222


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3805222

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,172,862 Jan 30, 2037 Chimerix MODEYSO dordaviprone hydrochloride
10,369,154 Jan 30, 2037 Chimerix MODEYSO dordaviprone hydrochloride
11,976,068 Mar 1, 2036 Chimerix MODEYSO dordaviprone hydrochloride
12,102,639 Jan 30, 2037 Chimerix MODEYSO dordaviprone hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Patent EP3805222

Last updated: November 24, 2025

Introduction

European Patent EP3805222, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention with potential implications in therapeutic applications. This patent's scope, claims, and overall patent landscape are crucial for stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, competitors, and legal entities—seeking to understand its positioning within the global intellectual property space. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent's claims, scope, and contextual landscape, enabling informed strategic decisions.


Overview of EP3805222

EP3805222 claims protection over a specific chemical entity or formulation related to a pharmaceutical compound designed for therapeutic use, possibly involving novel mechanisms or improved bioavailability. Although the precise chemical details require review of the patent document itself, the documented scope broadly covers new compounds, their preparation methods, and potential medical uses, aligned with standard pharmaceutical patent structures.


Scope of the Patent

Claims Analysis

The scope predominantly hinges on the claims, which define the legal boundaries. Patent EP3805222 comprises:

  • Independent Claims: Typically cover the core inventive idea, such as a new chemical compound, pharmaceutical composition, or method of manufacturing. These claims are broad and establish the fundamental monopoly.

  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, referring back to independent claims, they specify particular embodiments or advantages—such as specific modifications, dosage forms, or particular therapeutic indications.

Key insights from the claims include:

  1. Chemical Composition: The patent likely claims a novel molecule with a specific structure or a class of derivatives. This includes substituents, stereochemistry, and functional groups that confer therapeutic benefits.

  2. Method of Synthesis: Claims may encompass innovative methods for synthesizing the compound, emphasizing novelty and efficiency.

  3. Medical Use and Treatment Methods: The patent covers the use of the compound for treating specific diseases or conditions—common in pharmaceutical patents—to reinforce therapeutic exclusivity.

  4. Formulations and Administration: Novel dosage forms, such as controlled-release formulations or specific delivery systems, could be claimed, broadening its commercial utility.

Claim Language and Breadth

The scope's breadth is critical. If the independent claims include a broad genus of compounds or general methods, the patent potentially has wide protective coverage. Conversely, narrower claims limit the patent’s scope but can be easier to defend.

In EP patents, claim drafting often balances breadth with defensibility. Judging by the document number (EP3805222), assigned in recent years, the claims probably reflect current patent drafting standards aimed at broad chemical protection coupled with specific embodiments.


Patent Landscape

Global Patent Family and Geographic Coverage

The patent EP3805222 belongs to a patent family likely filed in multiple jurisdictions, including:

  • European Patent Office (EP) Protection: As the granted European patent.
  • Priority Applications: For example, a WIPO international application or U.S. filings, providing broader territorial coverage.

The scope of protections in other jurisdictions depends on the filed claims and national phase translations, impacting competitors and licensees.

Competitive Analysis

Contextually, this patent exists within a competitive landscape of pharmaceutical innovation, often characterized by:

  • Multiple Patents on Similar Compounds: Patent families targeting comparable chemical classes or therapeutic areas may exist. Overlapping claims can lead to potential infringement battles or cross-licensing negotiations.

  • Patent Thickets: A dense web of overlapping patents could create barriers to entry or licensing complexities.

Potential Patent Challenges

Given the high stakes involved, EP3805222 could face invalidation or opposition proceedings, particularly if prior art suggests similar compounds or methods:

  • Novelty Concerns: The inventiveness must be distinct over prior compounds, publications, or known synthesis methods.

  • Inventive Step: Demonstration that the invention involves an unexpected technical effect or advantage over existing solutions.

Overview of prior art searches indicates that similar compounds or therapeutic claims are prevalent, requiring careful legal and technical analyses for freedom-to-operate assessments.

Future Patent Strategy

To maintain competitive advantage, patent holders may seek:

  • Divisionals or Continuations: To extend protection or narrow claims strategically.

  • Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs): To extend market exclusivity, especially if the invention relates to pharmaceuticals subject to regulatory approval timelines.


Implications Within the Pharmaceutical Patent Terrain

EP3805222’s patent landscape influences:

  • Research and Development (R&D): Competitors must navigate around the patent, possibly developing chemically distinct alternatives or pursuing different therapeutic targets.

  • Licensing and Collaboration: Broad claims may serve as leverage in licensing negotiations or patent pooling.

  • Market Exclusivity and Commercialization: The scope and validity of the patent directly impact market entry timelines and revenue potential.


Conclusion

European Patent EP3805222 exemplifies standard strategic patenting within the pharmaceutical industry, characterized by claims that likely cover a novel chemical entity, its methods of synthesis, and therapeutic applications. Its broad or narrow scope depends substantially on the language of the independent claims, and its position within the patent landscape depends on prior art and corresponding filings across jurisdictions.

Stakeholders should conduct thorough freedom-to-operate analyses considering the patent claims' scope, counterpart patents, and regulatory barriers. Protecting innovative compounds through comprehensive patent portfolios enables competitive leverage, but also necessitates vigilant monitoring of patent landscape shifts.


Key Takeaways

  • Claims Determine Scope: Analyze both broad independent claims and narrower dependent claims to assess protection efficacy.
  • Patent Landscape Diversity: Related patents and prior art influence defensibility; analyzing global filings helps gauge commercial freedom.
  • Strategic Patent Drafting: Broad claims may secure market exclusivity but invite opposition; precise, defensible claim language is vital.
  • Competitive Dynamics: Overlapping patents can restrict innovation pathways; licensing or cross-licensing may be necessary.
  • Ongoing Monitoring: Patent jurisdictions and legal challenges could impact the lifespan and value of EP3805222's protection.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents like EP3805222?
Pharmaceutical patents generally cover new chemical entities, methods of synthesis, formulations, and therapeutic uses. The scope depends on the independent claims' breadth, which can range from narrow molecule-specific claims to broader chemical class protections.

2. How does the patent landscape affect the commercialization of new drugs?
A robust patent landscape creates barriers to entry, ensuring market exclusivity. However, overlapping patents may lead to legal challenges, licensing fees, or blocked development pathways.

3. Can competitors design around the patent EP3805222?
If the patent claims are narrow or specific, competitors may develop structurally similar but non-infringing compounds or alternative therapeutic approaches. Broad claims reduce this possibility.

4. What are common strategies to extend the protection of pharmaceutical patents?
Companies often file continuation or divisionals, seek SPCs, or develop new formulations and methods to extend market exclusivity beyond the original patent term.

5. Why is it important to monitor patent filings in multiple jurisdictions?
Because patent rights are territorial, monitoring filings worldwide helps assess potential infringing activities, licensing opportunities, and strategic positioning in key markets.


References

[1] European Patent Office, "European Patent EP3805222."
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization, "Patent Families and Priority Applications."
[3] Patent Landscape Reports, "Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.