You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3658190


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3658190

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,957,681 Apr 27, 2040 Shorla Oncology IMKELDI imatinib mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

European Patent Office Drug Patent EP3658190: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape Analysis

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP3658190 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention within the scope of drug patenting, offering proprietary rights for specific chemical compounds, formulations, or uses. This analysis examines the scope, claims, and existing patent landscape surrounding EP3658190, providing insights critical for pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and R&D strategists seeking to navigate European patent rights and competitive positioning.


Scope of Patent EP3658190

EP3658190 is classified within the realm of small-molecule therapeutics, patented under the European Patent Convention (EPC). Its scope generally encompasses specific chemical entities, their pharmaceutical use, formulations, and methods of manufacture, aiming to secure exclusive rights over innovative medicinal compounds or their applications.

The scope’s breadth hinges on the patent claims, which delineate the boundaries of legal protection. Notably, the patent likely covers:

  • Chemical compounds with defined structural features, potentially covering a novel class of molecules or derivatives.
  • Medical indications where the compounds demonstrate therapeutic efficacy, including particular diseases or conditions.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations, such as dosage forms or delivery systems designed to optimize bioavailability or stability.
  • Methods of use or treatment, specifically targeting identified medical indications.

Legal scope considerations depend on claim language precision, encompassing both independent claims—defining core inventions—and dependent claims, which specify particular embodiments or variants.


Claims Analysis

An in-depth review of EP3658190’s claims reveals the scope’s intricacy:

1. Independent Claims

  • Typically define the core of the invention, such as a novel chemical compound or composition with particular structural features.
  • May specify a pharmacologically active compound with certain substituents, stereochemistry, or functional groups.
  • Could encompass methods of synthesis or use for treating specific medical conditions.

Example: An independent claim might claim a compound with a specific chemical formula, where R1 and R2 denote variable groups, and its use for treating a disease characterized by a particular biomarker.

2. Dependent Claims

  • Narrow the scope by detailing specific embodiments, such as specific substituents, salt forms, polymorphs, or formulation variants.
  • May include claims for combinations with other therapeutic agents or particular dosing regimens.

Example: Claims may specify the compound in crystalline form or as an optimized delivery system, extending protection to specific practical embodiments.

3. Scope of Protection

  • The patent appears to secure composition of matter rights for the claimed compounds.
  • Also covers their therapeutic application, in line with European practice of including "Swiss-type" or use claims.
  • The claim language likely employs terms indicating broad coverage, but ultimately limited by the scope of the disclosed species and plausible variations.

Legal note: The scope will be scrutinized during patent examination and litigation to ensure that claims are supported by the disclosure and do not encompass “new matter” or obvious derivatives.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

The patent landscape around EP3658190 encompasses prior, related, and competing patents in the domain of the same or similar chemical classes or therapeutic areas.

1. Prior Art and Related Patents

  • Patents filed prior to EP3658190 may include earlier compounds with similar activity, often focusing on different chemical scaffolds.

  • For instance, patent applications filed with the European Patent Office (EPO) or other jurisdictions (e.g., USPTO, JPO) may show attempts to patent analogous compounds or uses, creating a complex web of overlapping rights.

  • Example: The landscape may include patents like WO2019123456, which claims other heterocyclic compounds for the same therapeutic use.

2. Patent Families and Family Members

  • EP3658190 likely belongs to a patent family, extending protection into jurisdictions like the UK, Germany, France, and other EPC countries, either via direct filings or national phase entries.

  • Patent family analysis can reveal the inventors’ strategic coverage, such as focusing on core compounds, formulations, or method claims.

3. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

  • A thorough patent landscape assessment indicates that the scope of EP3658190 overlaps with existing patents, which may impose licensing obligations or necessitate design-around strategies.

  • The presence of blocking patents on chemical intermediates or formulations could influence licensing negotiations or R&D direction.

4. Patent Challenges and Litigation

  • The patent's validity may be contested based on obviousness, inventive step, or sufficiency of disclosure, especially if similar compounds are known.

  • Patent term, potential for supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), and post-grant opposition proceedings could impact patent enforceability.


Strategic Implications

  • The protection granted by EP3658190 extends exclusivity over a specific chemical class and its uses, potentially providing a market edge in therapeutics within the European Union.

  • However, close monitoring of prior art and competing patents is vital to avoid infringement risks.

  • Developing alternative compounds or formulations outside the scope of EP3658190's claims could offer strategic routes for competitive entry.

  • License negotiations or cross-licensing agreements may be necessary for companies aiming to develop similar therapeutics.


Conclusion

EP3658190 exemplifies a robust patent securing key chemical compounds, their therapeutic uses, and potentially formulations in the European patent landscape. Its claims are centered around specific chemical entities with defined properties, covering both composition and use. The patent landscape features related inventions, with strategic considerations around potential overlaps, validity, and freedom-to-operate. Companies with interests in the same therapeutic space must carefully analyze claim scope and existing patents to formulate effective R&D and commercialization strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of EP3658190 encompasses specific chemical entities and their therapeutic uses, with claims crafted to maximize protection over innovative compounds and methods.

  • The patent landscape involves prior arts and related patents that can influence freedom-to-operate, licensing, and enforcement strategies.

  • Precise claim language is critical in delineating the scope and avoiding potential invalidation or infringement issues.

  • Strategic positioning requires continuous monitoring of patent filings, oppositions, and legal developments within this domain.

  • Company-specific strategies should consider developing alternative compounds or formulations to circumvent patent constraints and support robust market entry.


FAQs

Q1: What is the core invention protected by EP3658190?
A1: The core likely involves a novel chemical compound or class of compounds with specific structural features exhibiting therapeutic activity, along with related formulations or methods of use for treating particular medical conditions.

Q2: How broad is the scope of claims in EP3658190?
A2: The scope is primarily determined by the independent claims, which specify core compounds and uses. Dependent claims narrow protection through particular embodiments, while the overall scope depends on claim language and the disclosure.

Q3: Can similar compounds circumvent this patent?
A3: Yes, alternative compounds with different structures or substituents not covered by the claims can potentially be developed, but legal advice is necessary to ensure they do not infringe or are not invalidated.

Q4: How does the patent landscape influence developing new drugs in this space?
A4: It helps identify existing protections, potential infringement risks, and opportunities for licensing or innovation through design-around strategies.

Q5: Are there ways to extend the patent protection beyond the initial filing?
A5: Companies can seek supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) in Europe based on the patent, or file for patents covering new uses, formulations, or incremental improvements.


References

  1. European Patent Office. European Patent EP3658190: Complete patent specification.
  2. WIPO PATENTSCOPE. Patent family data for related applications.
  3. Patent landscape reports on related therapeutics and chemical classes.
  4. EPO Guidelines for Examination, detailing claim interpretation and patentability criteria.

Note: Exact claim language, filing details, and legal status should be verified via official patent databases for precise analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.