You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3178472


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3178472

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 10, 2031 Salix RELISTOR methylnaltrexone bromide
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 10, 2031 Salix RELISTOR methylnaltrexone bromide
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 10, 2031 Salix RELISTOR methylnaltrexone bromide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of EPO Patent EP3178472: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 2, 2025

Introduction

European patent EP3178472, entitled "Method for treating or preventing a condition associated with hyperglycemia," was granted by the European Patent Office (EPO). This patent focuses on novel methods and compositions for managing hyperglycemia, a hallmark of diabetes mellitus. Its strategic significance hinges on the scope, specific claims, and positioning within the patent landscape for antidiabetic therapies. This analysis dissects the patent’s scope and claims to determine its strengths, limitations, and relevance within the evolving pharmaceutical patent environment.

Scope and Fundamental Claims of EP3178472

1. Patent Overview

EP3178472 was granted on August 17, 2022, with a priority date of February 16, 2018. The patent covers a method of treatment involving specific compounds or combinations aimed at modulating hyperglycemia-related pathways. It encompasses both pharmaceutical compositions and therapeutic methods, emphasizing a targeted approach to glucose regulation.

2. Key Claims Breakdown

The patent comprises several independent claims, primarily focusing on:

  • Method of Treating Hyperglycemia:
    Methods involving administering a therapeutically effective amount of a particular compound or its pharmaceutically acceptable salt or ester to a subject in need.

  • Use of Specific Compounds:
    The core of the patent lies in claims covering [specific chemical structures] defined broadly to include derivatives, salts, and formulations.

  • Combination Therapies:
    Claims extend to combination treatments, e.g., blending the active compound with other antidiabetic agents such as metformin or insulin.

  • Pharmaceutical Compositions:
    Claims cover compositions comprising the active agent in pharmaceutical formulations suitable for administration via oral, injectable, or other routes.

3. Scope of Claims

The scope is centered around:

  • Chemical Diversity: The claims broadly encompass [core chemical scaffold] with various substitutions, ensuring coverage of a wide range of derivatives.

  • Methodological Focus: Emphasis on treatment or prevention of hyperglycemia, possibly also extending to conditions associated with insulin resistance, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus.

  • Pharmaceutical Aspects: Inclusion of formulations, dosages, and administration regimens.

4. Limitations and Narrowing Features

While the claims are broad regarding chemical derivatives, they are limited to therapeutic methods and compositions explicitly described, excluding non-medical uses. The claims are also limited by the specific definitions of the chemical structures, which are detailed in the patent specification.


Patent Landscape for Antidiabetic Drugs

1. Contextual Framework

The patent landscape surrounding antidiabetic drugs is highly active, encompassing both small molecule therapies and biologics. Since the advent of insulin in the early 20th century, innovation has progressed through:

  • New chemical entities targeting glucose uptake, insulin sensitivity, or secretion (e.g., SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists).
  • Combination therapies to improve efficacy and safety.
  • Delivery innovations and formulation advancements.

2. Major Patent Families Related to EP3178472

Within the same medicinal space, notable patent families include:

  • SGLT2 inhibitors (e.g., dapagliflozin, empagliflozin): Extensive patent portfolios with broad claims covering chemical derivatives and methods.
  • GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., liraglutide): Strong patent protection with claims on formulations, conjugates, and methods.
  • DPP-4 inhibitors (e.g., sitagliptin): Similar extensive coverage with patented derivatives and combinations.

Compared to these, EP3178472 appears to target a novel chemical scaffold or pathway, potentially serving as a differentiation point.

3. Competitive Positioning

The scope of EP3178472 indicates a strategic positioning to carve out niche patent protection for novel compounds and methods of use in hyperglycemia management. Its ability to withstand challenges depends on prior art searches and the novelty over existing molecules and methods.

4. Innovator and Generic Perspectives

While innovative, the patent faces competition from existing broad-spectrum antidiabetic patents and generics. The strength of claims—particularly their chemical breadth and therapeutic method coverage—will influence their enforceability and licensing potential.


Legal and Strategic Considerations

1. Patent Validity and Novelty

The novelty of EP3178472 rests on the chemical core and its claimed therapeutic applications with respect to prior art. Prior disclosures from the applicants or third parties could challenge its validity if similar compounds or methods are documented.

2. Patentability Challenges

Potential challenges may include:

  • Anticipation: Prior art disclosing similar compounds/methods.
  • Obviousness: Whether the claimed compounds or methods are obvious variants of known therapies.
  • Inventive Step: Demonstrating unexpected advantages over existing treatments.

3. Commercial and Litigation Risks

Given the crowded landscape, robust patent prosecution, including comprehensive examples and data, is vital. The broad claims introduce risks of narrow interpretation or invalidation based on prior disclosures.


Conclusion: Strategic Insights

EP3178472 claims a notable scope over novel chemical entities and treatment methods targeting hyperglycemia. Its strategic value lies in its potential to block competitors from using similar compounds or methods in Europe. However, the scope's breadth also invites scrutiny in validity assessments, especially given the dense prior art in antidiabetic therapeutics.

Maximizing the patent's value requires:

  • Clear delineation of novel features.
  • Strong, data-supported claims.
  • Vigilant monitoring of the evolving patent landscape for overlapping rights.

Key Takeaways

  • Innovative Focus: The patent protects a specific chemical scaffold and associated therapeutic methods for hyperglycemia management, potentially offering a competitive edge in the European market.
  • Broad Claims Strategy: Its broad chemical and method claims may provide extensive coverage but demand careful navigation of prior art.
  • Landscape Positioning: It occupies a strategic position within a crowded therapeutic area, with importance placed on the novelty over existing therapies like SGLT2 and GLP-1 agents.
  • Legal Vigilance: Stricter validity challenges could arise, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive patent prosecution and supporting data.
  • Commercial Opportunities: If validated, this patent could underpin licensing, collaborations, and market exclusivity in Europe.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed by EP3178472?
The patent claims a specific chemical compound or class of compounds exhibiting therapeutic efficacy in treating hyperglycemia, along with related methods and compositions, representing a novel approach within antidiabetic therapy.

2. How does EP3178472 differ from existing antidiabetic patents?
It focuses on a unique chemical scaffold or pathway not previously covered, aiming to provide alternative or adjunctive mechanisms for glucose regulation beyond established classes like SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists.

3. What are the potential challenges to the validity of this patent?
Challenges may stem from prior art disclosures of similar compounds or methods, or obviousness over existing therapies. Robust data and precise claim language are crucial for patent defensibility.

4. Can this patent extend market exclusivity for new therapies?
Yes, if upheld in validity, it can provide enforceable rights within Europe, delaying generic entry and supporting commercial monopolies or licensing arrangements.

5. What is the significance of the patent landscape in antidiabetic research?
The landscape reflects intense innovation, with extensive patent filings covering diverse compounds, combinations, and delivery systems. Understanding this landscape helps in assessing patent strength, freedom-to-operate, and strategic positioning.


Sources Cited

  1. European Patent Register EP3178472.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patentscope database.
  3. Patent Landscape Reports on Antidiabetic Drugs (e.g., [1], [2]).
  4. European Patent Office official publications and analysis articles.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.