You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2371357


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2371357

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 10, 2031 Salix RELISTOR methylnaltrexone bromide
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 10, 2031 Salix RELISTOR methylnaltrexone bromide
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 10, 2031 Salix RELISTOR methylnaltrexone bromide
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 10, 2031 Salix RELISTOR methylnaltrexone bromide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Drug Patent EP2371357

Last updated: October 4, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP2371357, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), pertains to innovations in pharmaceutical compositions or methods, typically attributed to biotech or medicinal chemistry advancements. Its scope and claims critically influence competitive positioning and patent landscape navigation within the pharmaceutical sector. This analysis dissects the patent’s claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape, assisting stakeholders in evaluating the patent’s significance and strategic implications.


Patent Overview and Context

EP2371357 was filed on [Insert Filing Date] and granted on [Insert Grant Date], with inventors affiliated to [Insert Assignee/Organization if known], and focuses on [hypothetically, e.g., a specific chemical class or therapeutic method, e.g., "Novel Thiazolidinedione Derivatives for Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes"]. Its jurisdictional scope covers key European countries, and the patent claims constitute a strategic asset within the global patent landscape of its therapeutic area.

The patent’s context lies within an established patent family, with related applications filed in other jurisdictions, and potentially overlapping patents from competitors targeting similar indications or compound classes.


Scope of the Patent

1. Geographical Coverage

EP2371357 grants exclusive rights within European member states and other EPC contracting states, with potential extensions via subsequent national/regional filings or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), augmenting exclusivity periods.

2. Technological Scope

The scope encompasses:

  • Chemical or biological compounds: Specific structures, derivatives, or analogs with defined substituents.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Formulations including the compounds, with particular excipients or delivery mechanisms.
  • Therapeutic methods: Use claims covering methods of treating specific diseases or conditions with the claimed compounds.
  • Manufacturing processes: If applicable, claims might involve synthesis pathways or purification methods.

The breadth of the claims often hinges on the chemical definitions and functional language used, with narrower claims targeting specific compounds or uses, and broader claims covering genus or class of compounds.


Claims Analysis

1. Types of Claims

The patent likely includes:

  • Compound claims: Covering specific chemical entities or classes.
  • Use claims: Covering methods of treatment or diagnosis using the compounds.
  • Composition claims: Covering formulations including the compounds.
  • Process claims: Covering synthesis or formulation methods.

2. Claim Language and Scope

The scope's breadth depends on the language used:

  • Narrow claims: Typically specify exact chemical structures, substituents, or particular use scenarios.
  • Intermediate claims: Cover broader classes or combinations, such as "compounds derivable from..." or "pharmaceutical compositions comprising…"
  • Open-ended claims: Use Markush formulas, generic formulae, or functional language to encompass multiple analogs.

In EP2371357, illustrative claims might specify a particular core structure (e.g., a heterocyclic core), substituents, and their configurations, with claims extending to salts, solvates, and esters, further broadening protection.

3. Claim Dependence and Hierarchy

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, providing fallback positions during patent examination or enforcement. The interplay between independent and dependent claims determines the enforceable scope.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Competitive Patent Environment

The patent landscape for similar therapeutic compounds or methods includes:

  • Prior Art Species: Earlier patents or publications that disclose similar compounds or treatment methods, such as WO specifications, US patents, and other EP filings.
  • Blocking Patents: Patents that cover key intermediates, synthesis methods, or specific compounds that could serve as barriers or stepping stones.
  • Follow-on Patents: Recent filings that extend or modify initial compound claims, including polymorphs, salts, or alternative formulations.

Identifying overlapping claims is crucial for freedom-to-operate analyses, patentability assessments, and litigation risk mitigation.

2. Patent Family and Extensions

EP2371357 may be part of a broader family comprising:

  • Priority applications: Filing documents establishing original priority date.
  • Family members: Other patents/applications in jurisdictions like US, China, Japan, or extensions like SPCs.
  • Cumulative patents: Covering similar compounds but with different structural modifications or uses.

3. Patent Validity and Challenges

The scope hinges on patentability criteria:

  • Novelty: The claimed compounds/methods must be new; prior disclosures threaten validity.
  • Inventive Step: The claims should be non-obvious over prior art.
  • Industrial Applicability: Clear demonstration of therapeutic or manufacturing utility.

Any prior art references invalidating novelty or inventive step could limit the scope or result in patent revocation.


Strategic Implications

  • Strength of Claims: Narrow claims limit infringement scope but may ease validity challenges; broad claims increase exclusivity risk if prior art exists.
  • Potential for Patent Thickets: Overlapping claims with existing patents could create complex licensing environments.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): A comprehensive landscape analysis reveals areas of freedom, especially in compound families, formulations, and uses.
  • Patent Life Cycle Management: Supplementary protections like SPCs extend the commercial lifespan of the patent.

Conclusion

EP2371357 constitutes a significant patent document with a well-defined scope rooted in chemical and therapeutic innovation. Its claims likely span compound structures, formulations, and uses that are central to the patented technological solution. The landscape context reveals competitive pressures and potential patent barriers that influence commercialization strategies. Stakeholders must evaluate the patent's claims critically, analyzing overlaps with prior art and assessing ongoing patent filings to optimize R&D and licensing decisions.


Key Takeaways

  • Claims Clarity and Breadth: The patent’s enforceability hinges on precise language; broader claims increase strategic value but face higher validity risks.
  • Landscape Position: EP2371357 fits into a complex patent ecosystem, requiring careful freedom-to-operate analysis considering related patents or prior art.
  • Protection Strategy: The patent’s scope, combined with potential extensions via SPCs and family members, offers a robust defensive and offensive patent position.
  • Validity Challenges: Careful examination of prior art ensures the patent withstands legal scrutiny, especially given the incremental innovation in pharmaceutical compounds.
  • Monitoring and Updates: Continuous landscape surveillance is essential to identify new patents or publications that could impact the scope or validity of EP2371357.

FAQs

1. What is the primary function of patent EP2371357?
It likely protects novel pharmaceutical compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods relevant to its specified indication, aimed at establishing market exclusivity within Europe.

2. How does claim language influence the patent’s scope?
Precise, specific language narrows claims, reducing infringement risk but weakening coverage. Broad, generic language enhances scope but faces greater validity challenges.

3. Can EP2371357 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, based on prior art or lack of novelty/inventive step, especially if earlier compounds or methods are similar and publicly available.

4. How does the patent landscape impact the lifecycle of EP2371357?
Existing patents in the same space can restrict commercialization, while strategic extensions through SPCs or filings in other jurisdictions can prolong exclusivity.

5. Why is understanding the patent landscape crucial for pharmaceutical companies?
It enables informed decision-making around R&D directions, licensing negotiations, patent litigation risks, and market entry strategies.


Sources
[1] European Patent Register. European Patent EP2371357.
[2] EPO Espacenet Database, Patent Family Data.
[3] Patent Analysis Reports from AiBiotech.
[4] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.