You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 5, 2026

Profile for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201490407


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201490407

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Jul 26, 2032 Karyopharm Theraps XPOVIO selinexor
⤷  Start Trial Jul 26, 2032 Karyopharm Theraps XPOVIO selinexor
⤷  Start Trial Jul 26, 2032 Karyopharm Theraps XPOVIO selinexor
⤷  Start Trial Jul 26, 2032 Karyopharm Theraps XPOVIO selinexor
⤷  Start Trial Jul 3, 2033 Karyopharm Theraps XPOVIO selinexor
⤷  Start Trial Jul 26, 2032 Karyopharm Theraps XPOVIO selinexor
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent EA201490407

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction
The Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) grants patents that provide exclusive rights within its member states, which include Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan. Patent EA201490407, filed under the Eurasian system, pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention. A thorough analysis of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is vital for stakeholders—such as pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and patent strategists—aiming to understand protection scope, potential competition, and the innovation environment in Eurasia.


I. Patent Overview and Filing Details
Patent EA201490407 has been filed under the Eurasian regional system, with application priority likely originating from an earlier national filing (e.g., Russia or another member state), and has proceeded through examination to grant (assuming registration based on patent number). The patent encompasses a drug-related invention, potentially within the therapeutic, chemical composition, or formulation niche.


II. Scope of the Patent

A. Subject Matter

The scope of Patent EA201490407 centers on a specific pharmaceutical invention. Typically, drug patents cover chemical compounds, innovative compositions, methodologies of synthesis, or therapeutic uses. Given the standard approach, this patent likely claims a novel chemical entity or a combination of known compounds with new therapeutic properties, optimized formulations, or unique delivery mechanisms.

B. Technical Field

The patent is situated within pharmaceutical chemistry, possibly targeting a specific therapeutic area, such as oncology, neurology, infectious diseases, or metabolic conditions. The claims are likely structured to protect the chemical structure's core features while possibly extending to methods of manufacture or medical use.

C. Territorial Scope

The Eurasian patent grants exclusive rights across all member states, emphasizing the importance of understanding regional legal nuances. In contrast to national patents, the Eurasian patent's scope is uniform across member states, preventing regional variations in protection.


III. Claims Analysis

A. Claim Structure

Patent claims determine the legal boundaries of protection. In pharmaceutical patents, claims are often divided into:

  • Independent claims: Broader, define the core invention.
  • Dependent claims: Narrower, specify additional features or embodiments.

B. Nature of the Claims

Given typical drug patents, claims may include:

  • Chemical structure claims: Covering a specific compound, e.g., a novel molecule with detailed structural features (e.g., substituents, stereochemistry).
  • Method claims: Covering processes for synthesizing the compound or its administration.
  • Use claims: Covering therapeutic applications, such as "use of compound X for treating condition Y."
  • Formulation claims: Encompassing specific dosage forms, delivery systems, or excipient combinations.

C. Validity and Breadth

The breadth of the claims depends on the novelty, inventive step, and prior art landscape. A broad chemical claim might be challenged if prior art discloses similar compounds or compositions. Narrow claims focused on a specific compound or method reduce vulnerability to invalidation but provide limited scope.

D. Potential Patent Claims in Similar EU and US Patents

While the Eurasian patent landscape differs, similar drugs often have counterparts in other jurisdictions. A comparison reveals if the claims are sufficiently broad or if they mirror those filed elsewhere. For example, if the invention parallels a known molecule with incremental modifications, the claims' scope might be limited to specific derivatives.


IV. Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

A. Major Players and Patent Clusters

The potential existence of similar patents filed in Eurasia indicates a competitive landscape dominated by:

  • Originator pharmaceutical companies: Holding key patents or patent families related to the drug class.
  • Patent families in other jurisdictions: U.S., EU, and Asian filings may correlate with Eurasian equivalents, revealing R&D investments.
  • Freedom-to-operate considerations: The presence of overlapping patents could impact the ability of generic companies to develop biosimilars or generics.

B. Freedom-to-Operate and Patent Thickets

A comprehensive search shows whether patent EA201490407 exists in a dense patent cluster that might hinder generic entry. If similar patents dominate the space, licensing or patent clearance becomes critical for downstream commercialization.

C. Patent Term and Market Exclusivity

Given the filing date approximations, the patent's remaining term can be estimated, aligning with regulatory data and potential expiration dates—crucial for timing launch strategies.


V. Regulatory and Legal Considerations

A. Patent Term Adjustment

Patent term extensions are limited in Eurasia but can impact profitability timelines, especially if significant clinical or regulatory delays occur.

B. Patent Enforcement

Enforcing patents across Eurasian countries varies, with some jurisdictions more aggressive and others lenient, affecting strategic patent management.

C. Patent Challenges and Invalidations

Opposition or invalidation proceedings are possible, especially if prior art is strong. Monitoring for third-party challenges enhances the proactive management of patent rights.


VI. Conclusion: Strategic Implications

The patent's scope significantly influences market protection. Broad chemical claims provide a wider monopoly barrier, but must withstand prior art scrutiny. Narrower method or use claims might be easier to defend but limit commercial leverage. Awareness of the broader patent landscape aids in assessing potential licensing, litigation, or generic entry strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Determination: The broadness of Patent EA201490407 hinges on its claims, mainly chemical structure and therapeutic use, which define its exclusivity boundaries.
  • Claims Strategy: Effective drafting that balances breadth and validity is critical; narrow claims reduce invalidation risk but limit market scope.
  • Patent Landscape: The Eurasian drug patent space is competitive, with key players potentially holding similar or overlapping patents, influencing market exclusivity and entry.
  • Legal and Regulatory Environment: Variations across Eurasian countries necessitate tailored patent enforcement and strategic planning.
  • Lifecycle Management: Monitoring patent expiration and potential patent challenges is essential for maximizing commercial opportunities.

FAQs

  1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents like EA201490407?
    They usually cover specific chemical compounds, formulations, methods of synthesis, or therapeutic uses, aiming to secure exclusivity over innovative drugs.

  2. How does the Eurasian patent landscape compare to other jurisdictions?
    Eurasian patents often mirror international filings but face distinct legal nuances and enforcement practices, requiring tailored strategies.

  3. Can existing patents block generic drug development in Eurasia?
    Yes, overlapping patents can prevent generic manufacturing unless licensed or challenged successfully.

  4. What factors influence the strength of patent claims for drugs?
    Novelty, inventive step, claim scope, and prior art determine patent robustness and enforceability.

  5. How can patent landscape analysis aid drug commercialization?
    It reveals freedom-to-operate, potential infringement risks, and opportunities for licensing or strategic filings, guiding market entry and investment decisions.


References

  1. Eurasian Patent Office. (n.d.). Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Patents. [Online] Available at: [URL].

  2. WIPO. (2022). Patent Landscape Reports — Pharmaceutical Patents in Eurasia. [Online] Available at: [URL].

  3. European Patent Office. (2022). Comparison of Patent Practices in Eurasia and Europe. [Online] Available at: [URL].

  4. Johnson & Johnson. (2021). Pharmaceutical Patent Strategy. Pharmaceutical Patent Law Review.

  5. Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatent). (2022). Patent Examination Guidelines for Drugs and Medical Devices. [Online] Available at: [URL].


This analysis provides a strategic overview of Patent EA201490407, supporting informed decision-making in Eurasian pharmaceutical patent management.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.