You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201291276


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201291276

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,918,970 May 18, 2031 Astellas VESICARE LS solifenacin succinate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Eurasian Patent Organization Drug Patent EA201291276

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

The Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) grants patents that provide intellectual property protection across its member states—primarily Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Armenia. Patent EA201291276 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, and a comprehensive analysis of its scope, claims, and the current patent landscape is essential for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and competitive intelligence.

This analysis addresses the patent's technical content, legal scope, claim structure, related patents, and competitive positioning within the Eurasian pharmaceutical IP environment.


Patent Overview

  • Patent Number: EA201291276
  • Filing Date: Approximately 2012 (actual filing date needed for precision)
  • Grant Date: Date of publication or grant (exact date needed)
  • Applicant: [Applicant/Patent Holder Name]
  • Jurisdictions Covered: Eurasian Patent Convention member states

(Note: The following details are indicative; precise information would require full patent document access.)


Technical Field and Invention Summary

The patent pertains to pharmaceutical compounds/formulations intended for therapeutic purposes—most likely targeting conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, or infectious diseases, based on typical patent filings in this domain. The core invention includes novel chemical entities, formulation methods, or therapeutic combinations exhibiting improved efficacy, stability, or bioavailability.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent essentially defines the boundaries within which the patent holder has exclusive rights. It encompasses the description of the invention, the claims, and relevant embodiments.

1. Technical Scope

  • The patent appears to cover a specific chemical compound or class of compounds, potentially with a unique substitution pattern or structural motif, designed for high therapeutic activity.
  • Alternatively, the scope may extend to pharmaceutical compositions incorporating the compound, including dosage forms and delivery systems.
  • The patent might also encompass methods of synthesizing these compounds or methods of treatment using them.

2. Geographical Scope

  • Valid across all EAPO member countries, providing a unified regional patent right.

3. Legal Scope

  • The legal scope is predominantly determined by the claims section, which constrains the extent of protection.

Claims Analysis

The patent likely includes independent and dependent claims structured to define the invention's exact scope.

1. Independent Claims

  • These broadly define the core invention—e.g., "A compound of the formula [chemical structure], wherein R1, R2, R3 are defined subgroups," or "A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier."
  • They establish the core novelty and inventive step, often detailing chemical structures, process steps, or therapeutic methods.

2. Dependent Claims

  • Narrower claims that specify particular embodiments, such as specific substituents, forms, or uses.
  • They serve to reinforce protection, fallback positions, and geographical validity.

3. Claim Language and Scope

  • The claims are expected to be precise and limiting. For example, claims may specify particular chemical substitutions, stereochemistry, or formulation parameters.
  • Overly broad claims risk prior art invalidation; precise claims maximize enforceability.

4. Critical Considerations

  • Whether the claims are directed to the compound, compositions, methods of synthesis, or methods of treatment.
  • Potential for patent term extensions or secondary patents related to formulations or delivery methods.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

1. Prior Art and Patent Family Analysis

  • The patent landscape in Eurasia is rich with filings covering chemical entities related to innovative pharmaceuticals, especially in metabolic disorders, oncology, or infectious diseases.
  • Similar patents from major pharmaceutical companies often cover analogous compounds or methods and can pose initial prior art hurdles.

2. Related Patents

  • Likely part of a patent family, with equivalents filed in other jurisdictions (US, Europe, China).
  • These may include international applications (PCT filings) or national patent applications, expanding the protection horizon.

3. Infringement Risks and Freedom-to-Operate

  • Stakeholders should scrutinize the claims' scope against existing patents to assess infringement risks.
  • The core compound may be obvious or non-obvious depending on prior art, influencing enforcement or licensing strategies.

4. Patentability and Limitations

  • Patent validity hinges upon novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.
  • The Eurasian patent's claims should be evaluated for potential flexibility (e.g., overlapping with known compounds) and breadth.

Legal and Market Implications

1. Patent Lifecycle

  • Given the filing date circa 2012, expiration is expected around 2032-2033, assuming standard 20-year protection, subject to patent term adjustments.
  • Opportunities exist for filing divisional patents or formulation patents to extend protection.

2. Competitive Strategies

  • The patent grants exclusivity in Eurasia, providing market leverage.
  • It can be a basis for licensing agreements, joint ventures, or settlement of patent disputes.

3. Regulatory Pathways

  • The patent's validity supports market authorization and data exclusivity in member jurisdictions.
  • Clarification of patent claims enhances IP enforcement during commercial manufacturing.

Concluding Remarks

The Eurasian patent EA201291276 encompasses a chemical or formulation invention with a scope primarily defined by its claims. Its strategic value depends on the strength and breadth of these claims, as well as its position within the existing patent landscape.

For companies aiming to develop or commercialize drugs within the Eurasian region, understanding the precise claims and potential patent overlaps is essential. The patent likely provides a solid IP foundation for selective market entry but warrants thorough landscape analysis to identify and mitigate infringement risks.


Key Takeaways

  • Claims Clarity: Specific, well-defined claims enhance enforceability and market protection.
  • Landscape Awareness: Comparing similar patents is critical to assessing freedom to operate.
  • Lifecycle Management: Legal strategies should include patent term extensions and filing related patents.
  • Geographical Scope: Eurasian patent grants regional exclusivity but must be monitored for potential conflicts.
  • Strategic Positioning: The patent offers leverage for licensing, collaborations, and market entry.

FAQs

Q1. What is the strategic importance of patent EA201291276 for pharmaceutical companies operating in Eurasia?
A: It secures exclusive rights for the invention within Eurasia, enabling safe market entry, licensing opportunities, and exclusion of competitors, provided the claims are sufficiently broad and valid.

Q2. How does the scope of the claims influence patent enforcement?
A: Broader claims allow wider protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation by prior art. Precise, well-crafted claims increase enforceability and reduce legal risks.

Q3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated in Eurasia?
A: Yes. If prior art predates its filing date or if the claims fail to meet patentability criteria, third parties can challenge its validity via opposition procedures or legal actions.

Q4. How does the patent landscape affect drug development strategies?
A: Understanding existing patents informs R&D, helps avoid infringement, guides licensing negotiations, and identifies potential freedom-to-operate issues.

Q5. What future actions should patent holders consider?
A: Patent holders should monitor regional patent jurisdictions, consider filing related patents (e.g., formulations or methods), and develop strategies for patent term extensions and enforcement.


References

  1. Eurasian Patent Office official documents and claims database.
  2. Patent EA201291276 publication and legal status reports.
  3. Patent landscape reports related to pharmaceutical patents in Eurasia.
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization database for patent family analysis.
  5. Relevant jurisprudence and patent law guidelines from EAPO jurisdictions.

Note: Complete patent documents, legal status, and precise filing details are necessary for exhaustive analysis. This overview provides a structured framework based on standard practices and typical patent features.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.